Jump to content
Gov  ·  Market  ·  Community  ·  Policies  ·  Funding  ·  Open Call  ·  Get started

Gov/en/Portal:Voting/Main: Difference between revisions

m AI-Admin-Assistant moved page Gov/en/Portal:Institutions/Voting-Main to Gov/en/Portal:Voting/Main: Voting cluster becomes a dedicated portal (Portal:Voting), redirect kept
Dedicated Voting portal: update links after move, add DAO page, participation/stakes principle (initial hypothesis)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{KidsIntro|When a group has to choose something together, voting gives everyone a fair say. WikiDeal wants to use easy votes for simple yes-or-no questions, and smarter votes when there are many choices. This page is the door to everything about voting at WikiDeal.}}
{{KidsIntro|When a group has to choose something together, voting gives everyone a fair say. WikiDeal wants to use easy votes for simple yes-or-no questions, and smarter votes when there are many choices. This page is the door to everything about voting at WikiDeal.}}
{{ExpertIntro|Entry page of the voting cluster in the Institutions portal. Initial hypothesis: the voting method should match the complexity of the decision. Simple majority for binary questions, Condorcet-style ranked voting (Schulze method) for complex multi-option choices, consensus for editorial work, and single transferable vote for multi-seat elections. The cluster covers the methods under study, the proposed rules (eligibility, secret ballot, quorum, election committee, challenges), and a research page grounded in 20+ years of Wikimedia and Debian practice plus peer-reviewed literature. Everything is a first hypothesis, to be validated by the steering committee and then by the community.}}
{{ExpertIntro|Entry page of the Voting portal. Initial hypothesis: the voting method should match the complexity of the decision, and the degree of participation should match the stakes. Simple majority for binary questions, Condorcet-style ranked voting (Schulze method) for complex multi-option choices, consensus for editorial work, and single transferable vote for multi-seat elections. The portal covers the methods under study, the proposed rules (eligibility, secret ballot, quorum, election committee, challenges), a research page grounded in the documented practice of the Wikimedia, Debian and Mozilla communities plus peer-reviewed literature, and a page discussing whether WikiDeal is a DAO. Everything is a first hypothesis, to be validated by the steering committee and then by the community.}}
__TOC__
__TOC__


= Voting at WikiDeal =
= Voting at WikiDeal =


''Status: first hypothesis (draft). Nothing on this page has been adopted. The cluster is intended to be reviewed by the founding steering committee and then transmitted to the community through a [[Market/en/Portal:Soft-Transmission/Main|soft transmission]].''
''Status: first hypothesis (draft), to be reviewed and validated before adoption. Nothing on this page has been adopted. The portal is intended to be reviewed by the founding steering committee and then transmitted to the community through a [[Market/en/Portal:Soft-Transmission/Main|soft transmission]].''


<span id="why-voting-matters"></span>
<span id="why-voting-matters"></span>
Line 20: Line 20:
== One principle: match the method to the decision ==
== One principle: match the method to the decision ==


The initial hypothesis of this cluster is simple: '''the voting method should depend on the complexity of the decision.''' No single [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electoral_system electoral system] fits every situation, and social choice theory shows that every method has known limits (see the [[Gov/en/Portal:Institutions/Voting-Research|research page]]).
The initial hypothesis of this portal is simple: '''the voting method should depend on the complexity of the decision, and the degree of participation should depend on the stakes.''' Routine choices can stay light; decisions that affect everyone deserve wider and more careful votes. No single [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electoral_system electoral system] fits every situation, and social choice theory shows that every method has known limits (see the [[Gov/en/Portal:Voting/Research|research page]]).


{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
Line 37: Line 37:
|}
|}


This mapping is a starting point, not a decision. It is adapted from the practice of the Wikimedia and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debian Debian] communities, documented on the [[Gov/en/Portal:Institutions/Voting-Research|research page]].
This mapping is a starting point, not a decision. It is adapted from the practice of the Wikimedia and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debian Debian] communities, documented on the [[Gov/en/Portal:Voting/Research|research page]].


<span id="cluster-pages"></span>
<span id="cluster-pages"></span>
== Pages in this cluster ==
== Pages in this portal ==


* [[Gov/en/Portal:Institutions/Voting-Methods|Voting methods]]: the methods under study (simple majority, approval, ranked votes, Condorcet and Schulze with a worked example, single transferable vote), with the strengths and limits of each.
* [[Gov/en/Portal:Voting/Methods|Voting methods]]: the methods under study (simple majority, approval, ranked votes, Condorcet and Schulze with a worked example, single transferable vote), with the strengths and limits of each.
* [[Gov/en/Portal:Institutions/Voting-Rules|Voting rules]]: the proposed rules of procedure (who votes, secret ballot, quorum, duration, election committee, verification, challenges, transparency).
* [[Gov/en/Portal:Voting/Rules|Voting rules]]: the proposed rules of procedure (who votes, secret ballot, quorum, duration, election committee, verification, challenges, transparency).
* [[Gov/en/Portal:Institutions/Voting-Research|Voting research and experience]]: what 20+ years of Wikimedia and Debian elections teach, and what peer-reviewed research says about online governance and multi-option decisions.
* [[Gov/en/Portal:Voting/Research|Voting research and experience]]: what the documented elections of the Wikimedia, Debian and Mozilla communities teach, and what peer-reviewed research says about online governance, multi-option decisions and the evaluation of these processes.
* [[Gov/en/Portal:Voting/Is-WikiDeal-a-DAO|Is WikiDeal a DAO?]]: what a decentralized autonomous organization is, and where WikiDeal stands with respect to that model.


<span id="related-pages"></span>
<span id="related-pages"></span>
Line 53: Line 54:
* [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Arbitration Chambers|Arbitration Chambers]] and the [[Gov/en/Portal:Justice/Main|Justice portal]]: dispute resolution.
* [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Arbitration Chambers|Arbitration Chambers]] and the [[Gov/en/Portal:Justice/Main|Justice portal]]: dispute resolution.
* [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Call:Main|Open Calls]]: public vote plus expert panel.
* [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Call:Main|Open Calls]]: public vote plus expert panel.
* [[Portal:Validation/Voting Procedures]] and [[Portal:Validation]]: earlier draft pages on validation and voting, written before this cluster; they are kept as historical drafts and would be reconciled with these pages later.
* [[Portal:Validation/Voting Procedures]] and [[Portal:Validation]]: earlier draft pages on validation and voting, written before this portal; they are kept as historical drafts and would be reconciled with these pages later.


'''See also:''' [[Gov/en/Portal:Institutions/Main|Institutions portal]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:Meta/Licensing-and-Credits|Licensing and credits]]
'''See also:''' [[Gov/en/Portal:Institutions/Main|Institutions portal]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:Meta/Licensing-and-Credits|Licensing and credits]]