Jump to content
Gov  ·  Market  ·  User Groups  ·  Recent changes  ·  Get started

Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Research:Why-And-How-It-Can-Work: Difference between revisions

From WikiDeal
Restructure: merge foundational levers + arguments into one numbered list (11 levers) in two phases A/B (early adopters / users after); add TOC; add legal support & contract models; rename to "Fair Commission Fees & Attractive Pricing" and "Efficient Funding Mechanism"; reference Innovations:Main
Restructure by audience (A early adopters / B communities & SSE marketplaces / C legal professionals / D users at large = principal lever); levers as conjunctions of innovations (not innovation listings); add legal facilitation; fair commission fees & attractive pricing; efficient funding mechanism; TOC
 
Line 8: Line 8:
This page presents the reasons we believe there is strong growth potential for WikiDeal. It complements the [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Research:Main|founding research hypothesis]] — "[[Gov/en/Portal:Onboarding/Glossary:Founding Question|Can users own, run and sustain a global marketplace?]]" — with a concrete '''shared vision''' and '''deployment strategy''' rolled out progressively, through organic market expansion.
This page presents the reasons we believe there is strong growth potential for WikiDeal. It complements the [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Research:Main|founding research hypothesis]] — "[[Gov/en/Portal:Onboarding/Glossary:Founding Question|Can users own, run and sustain a global marketplace?]]" — with a concrete '''shared vision''' and '''deployment strategy''' rolled out progressively, through organic market expansion.


These are not promises. WikiDeal is a [[Gov/en/Portal:Onboarding/Glossary:Founding Question|proof of concept]] and a citizen science project. But there are substantive reasons to believe the model can achieve broad adhesion. They are laid out here.
These are not promises. WikiDeal is a [[Gov/en/Portal:Onboarding/Glossary:Founding Question|proof of concept]] and a citizen science project. But there are substantive reasons to believe the model can achieve broad adhesion. They are laid out here as '''success levers''' — the possible sources and drivers of success.


Below are the '''success levers''' the possible sources and drivers of success — that together constitute the economic and social engine of WikiDeal Prototype 1. They are interconnected: changes to one affect the others. These are the '''initial proposed levers for success'''; the list is open and expected to evolve over time as the model develops. All are subject to community review via the [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Call:Main|Open Call]] process.
Each lever is a '''conjunction of several [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Main|sociotechnical innovations]]''' working together. This page does '''not''' describe the innovations themselves (see the [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Main|Innovations Index]] for that); it describes the '''competitive advantages''' that emerge when those innovations combine. The levers are open and expected to evolve over time; these are the initial proposed levers, all subject to community review via the [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Call:Main|Open Call]] process.


The levers are grouped in two phases: '''(A) levers to start''' — what attracts the early adopters, pioneers and opinion leaders who launch the platform — and '''(B) levers to last''' — what keeps the broader public engaged once the platform is running.
The levers are presented '''by audience, in order of appearance''' — the publics that join WikiDeal one after another as it grows:
 
* '''(A) Early adopters''' — pioneers, influencers, opinion leaders who launch the platform;
* '''(B) Communities & online marketplaces''' long-tail and Social & Solidarity Economy networks that migrate in;
* '''(C) Legal professionals''' — lawyers and jurists who formalise and adapt contracts;
* '''(D) Users at large''' — the broad public, whose '''lower final prices, more flexible services, and built-in dispute prevention''' make WikiDeal attractive. '''This last audience (D) is the principal lever for broad deployment''': if WikiDeal offers a marketplace with better prices and more flexible services than the competition — bootstrapped by volunteering, as on Wikipedia, and sustained by rewards for contributors — broad adhesion becomes probable rather than merely possible.


__TOC__
__TOC__
Line 18: Line 23:
----
----


= A. Levers to Start — Early Adopters, Pioneers & Opinion Leaders =
= A. Early Adopters — Pioneers, Influencers & Opinion Leaders =


This first set of levers is what mobilises the '''early adopters''' (alias pioneers, influencers, opinion leaders): the people who launch User Groups, bring their communities, and contribute both '''money and ideas''' to the platform. They are drawn by WikiDeal's free culture (open licence and open content) and its purpose as a '''commons'''. WikiDeal also rests on a body of '''sociotechnical innovations''' — see the [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Main|Innovations Index]] for the full set.
This first set of levers mobilises the '''early adopters''' (pioneers, influencers, opinion leaders): the people who launch User Groups, bring their communities, and contribute both '''money and ideas''' to this participative platform. They are drawn by WikiDeal's '''free culture''' (open licence and open content) and its purpose as a '''commons'''. These levers rest on a body of [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Main|sociotechnical innovations]] combined for effect.


== 1. Participative Contracts & Legal Support ==
== 1. A Commons They Co-Own: Exit to Community ==


At the core of WikiDeal are '''Participative Contracts''': open, transparent agreements, co-created and validated by the community, much like Wikipedia articles. They replace traditional opaque contracts, ensuring fairness and accountability in every Transaction. Community validation — voting and peer review — ensures contracts evolve to meet the needs of all participants, fostering trust and shared ownership.
Early adopters do not merely use WikiDeal — they progressively own and govern it. The '''Exit to Community''' lever combines progressive transfer of governance, proportional voting rights tied to participation, and community-elected bodies, so that control increasingly resides with those who use and contribute to the platform. For pioneers, this means their early energy compounds into lasting influence over the platform's direction.


Contracts on WikiDeal are [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Collaborative Contract Editing|wiki-edited, versioned, and community-validated]] — like Wikipedia articles, but for legal agreements. They evolve as the community's understanding improves.
== 2. Efficient Funding Mechanism ==


'''Legal support and ready-to-use contract models''' are a central draw for early adopters:
Early supporters who believe in the project receive proportionally greater rewards as it grows. This '''efficient funding mechanism''' is a conjunction of innovations — a Bonding Curve (transparent, mathematically fixed issuance of Credits) coupled with a Funding Stabilizer (dynamic recalibration of newly generated Credits between community and individual rewards). Together they give early adopters predictable, adaptive incentives, aligning personal reward with sustainable, community-beneficial growth.


* A growing library of '''ready-to-use contract models''': employment agreements, volunteering contracts, bike-loan agreements, childcare arrangements, tutoring, co-housing, and many more.
== 3. Organic Deployment Rewarding Initiative ==
* '''Volunteer lawyers endorse''' these models and take named, accountable responsibility ([[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Peer Endorsement|Peer Endorsement]]), making contracts legally credible and fair.
* As the community grows, more endorsed contract models become available in more jurisdictions, reducing friction for international transactions.


This combination of transparency, fluidity, legal backing and accountability is rare in the marketplace economy.
Markets need not be created from above — they emerge from '''citizen initiative'''. Small entrepreneurs, associations and cooperatives launching their own User Groups (babysitting networks, transport cooperatives, tool libraries, artist collectives, tutoring circles) bring both supply and demand simultaneously. This lever combines Community Migrations, Living Labs and a co-opetitive structure: rather than a cold-start marketing campaign, growth is organic, stimulating '''merit''' and '''personal initiative''' and rewarding those who invest energy in building their community's marketplace. Competition is internal, productive and governed — better service without destructive rivalry.
 
----


== 2. Exit to Community ==
= B. Communities & Online Marketplaces =


WikiDeal is built on '''[[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Exit To Community|Exit to Community]]''', a progressive model for transferring governance and ownership from the founding Ynternet.org Foundation to the collective of its User Groups. As the platform grows, its direction and control increasingly reside with those who use and contribute to it — through proportional voting rights tied to participation, community-elected governance bodies, and phased decentralization of decision-making power.
The second audience is made of '''existing communities and online marketplaces''' from the long tail of niche networks to the broader '''Social & Solidarity Economy (SSE)'''. These groups already have internal transaction flows and trust relationships; WikiDeal offers them a shared home that multiplies their reach without dissolving their autonomy.


== 3. Efficient Funding Mechanism ==
== 4. Community Migrations & Autonomous User Groups ==


Financial stability and growth are secured by an '''efficient funding mechanism''': a '''[[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Bonding Curve|Bonding Curve]] & Funding Stabilizer''' dual algorithm. The '''Bonding Curve''' is a transparent, mathematically fixed mechanism governing the issuance of Credits and their value, rewarding early adopters and ensuring predictable funding. The '''[[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Funding Stabilizer|Funding Stabilizer]]''' is a dynamic adjustment layer that responds to the platform's financial health, automatically recalibrating the distribution of newly generated Credits between community and individual rewards. Together they provide long-term predictability and adaptive responsiveness, aligning incentives for sustainable growth and community benefit.
This lever combines [[Gov/en/Portal:Ecosystem/Community-Migrations|Community Migrations]] with autonomous [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:User Groups|User Groups]]: communities migrate their practices onto WikiDeal's framework while keeping their own governance, their own commission rates, and their own contract adaptations. SSE actors — cooperatives, associations, mutual-aid networks — find a platform whose values (commons, fairness, participation) match their own, and whose tooling lets them scale without surrendering control.


'''Early Supporters fund the foundation:''' the Bonding Curve and [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Why-Fund-WikiDeal|funding model]] ensure that those who believe in the project early receive proportionally greater rewards as it grows.
== 5. One Unified Platform: Rings of Trust ==


== 4. Citizen Initiatives: Organic Market Deployment ==
Fragmentation is the enemy of small players. This lever unites them: '''all the small players ally on a single shared platform''' and, together, outcompete large incumbents — not through acquisition or aggression, but through structural fairness and network effects. Rings of Trust connect User Groups across domains (a babysitter's Miles Credits become usable for tutoring, transport, or festival services), track records follow users across contexts with consent, and contract models are shared and improved collectively. A single, well-governed commons is more powerful than many small private silos.


One of WikiDeal's core deployment hypotheses is that '''markets need not be created from above''' — they can emerge organically from citizen initiative. Small entrepreneurs, associations, and cooperatives launching their own User Groups (babysitting networks, local transport cooperatives, tool libraries, artist collectives, tutoring circles) bring both supply and demand simultaneously when they migrate to WikiDeal.
----


This is what [[Gov/en/Portal:Ecosystem/Community-Migrations|Community Migrations]] are designed for. Existing communities those that already have internal transaction flows and trust relationships — migrate their practices onto WikiDeal's framework. Rather than a cold-start marketing campaign, this is organic market deployment: stimulating '''merit''' and '''personal initiative''', rewarding those who invest energy in building their community's marketplace.
= C. Legal Professionals Lawyers & Jurists =


The [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Coopetition|co-opetitive]] structure means that User Groups have more incentive to improve their own quality than to fight over external users. The competition is internal, productive, and governed producing better service without destructive rivalry.
A distinctive audience for WikiDeal is the '''legal profession'''. Lawyers and jurists are not bystanders here they have an active, remunerated role that turns legal expertise into a growth lever.


== 5. A Deployment Strategy That Grows Without Conquest ==
== 6. Legal Facilitation: Coaching, Contracts & Arbitration ==


The deployment strategy is progressive and non-aggressive:
This lever combines collaborative contract editing, peer endorsement, and arbitration into a professional opportunity for jurists:


# '''Living Labs first:''' [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:User Groups|User Groups]] launch as Living Labs — small-scale, real-world experiments in specific domains (babysitting, tutoring, tool libraries, etc.).
* '''Coaching & contract formalisation''' — lawyers help formalise and adapt [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Collaborative Contract Editing|wiki-edited, versioned, community-validated contract models]] to specific needs, generating '''income''' for them.
# '''Community Migrations:''' Existing cooperatives and associations migrate to WikiDeal, bringing their users and transaction flows.
* '''Prevention over cure''' — by building clear, fair contracts up front, jurists help '''prevent conflicts rather than litigate them''', a more sustainable and reputation-building practice.
# '''Rings of Trust expand:''' As more User Groups join, Miles Credits become more widely usable, increasing the network's value.
* '''Peer endorsement''' — volunteer lawyers endorse models and take named, accountable responsibility ([[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Peer Endorsement|Peer Endorsement]]), making contracts legally credible across jurisdictions.
# '''Open Calls drive innovation:''' The community proposes, debates, and adopts improvements through seasonal [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Call:Main|Open Calls]].
* '''Arbitration''' — jurists can participate in dispute resolution via [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Arbitration Chambers|Arbitration Chambers]].
# '''Early Supporters fund the foundation:''' The [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Bonding Curve|Bonding Curve]] and [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Why-Fund-WikiDeal|funding model]] ensure that those who believe in the project early receive proportionally greater rewards as it grows.
# '''Volunteer lawyers expand legal coverage:''' As the community grows, more endorsed contract models become available in more jurisdictions, reducing friction for international transactions.


At no stage does WikiDeal need to acquire a competitor, launch an aggressive advertising campaign, or exploit its user base to grow. The growth is structural: each new User Group, Ring of Trust, and endorsed contract adds value to the whole ecosystem.
A growing library of '''ready-to-use contract models in free access''' (employment, volunteering, bike loan, childcare, tutoring, co-housing, and more) is browsable by anyone; lawyer-endorsed versions add legal credibility. For jurists, WikiDeal is a new field of practice that aligns income with conflict prevention.


----
----


= B. Levers to Last Users After the Early Adopters =
= D. Users at Large The Principal Lever for Broad Deployment =


Once the platform is launched by its pioneers, this second set of levers is what attracts and retains the '''broader public''' — the everyday users who buy and sell services after the early adopters. For them, what matters most is attractive pricing, flexibility, trust, and a single place where everything works together.
The broadest audience — and, as stated in the introduction, '''the principal lever for large-scale deployment''' — is the general public who buy and sell services. For them, three advantages combine: '''lower final prices''', '''more flexible services''', and '''built-in help to prevent and resolve disputes'''.


== 6. Fair Commission Fees & Attractive Pricing ==
== 7. Fair Commission Fees & Attractive Pricing ==


What matters most for broad adhesion is '''attractive pricing''' — a marketplace with better prices and more flexible services than the competition.
What matters most for broad adhesion is '''attractive pricing''' — a marketplace with better prices than the competition.


WikiDeal's commission hypothesis ranges from '''5–15%''' (vs. 10–50% for most incumbent platforms). See [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Revenue-Structure|Revenue Structure]] for the complete model. This is '''not zero''' — those who deploy and operate services on WikiDeal must earn a '''dignified, decent income'''. The goal is not to impoverish service providers. The goal is to eliminate '''extreme profit extraction''' — the binary logic of the GAFAM and net-economy IPO culture, which operates on a winner-takes-all dynamic.
WikiDeal's commission hypothesis ranges from '''5–15%''' (vs. 10–50% for most incumbent platforms; see [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Revenue-Structure|Revenue Structure]]). This is '''not zero''' — those who deploy and operate services must earn a '''dignified, decent income'''. The goal is not to impoverish service providers, but to eliminate '''extreme profit extraction''' — the winner-takes-all logic of GAFAM and net-economy IPO culture.


WikiDeal escapes this logic by design. Because the platform is a commons — governed by the [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Exit To Community|Exit to Community]] principle and structured around [[Gov/en/Portal:Ecosystem/Coopetition|co-opetition]] — it does not need to conquer. It can grow '''without being forced to buy or destroy competitors'''. Instead, the strategy is to '''unite the strength of the small''' (''unir la force des petits''): all the small players — independent service providers, cooperatives, citizen initiatives — can ally on a single commons platform and, together, outcompete the large incumbents, not through aggression, but through structural fairness.
WikiDeal escapes this logic by design. As a commons — governed by [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Exit To Community|Exit to Community]] and structured around [[Gov/en/Portal:Ecosystem/Coopetition|co-opetition]] — it does not need to conquer. It can grow '''without buying or destroying competitors''', uniting '''the strength of the small''' (''unir la force des petits'') against the large incumbents through structural fairness.


For large portions of the population, a '''10–20% saving''' on everyday services is economically meaningful — not a luxury, a necessity. Transport, housing, childcare, household services: when the incumbent platform extracts 25–35% and WikiDeal charges 5–10%, the difference stays in the pocket of the service provider '''and''' reflects in the price offered to the client. This creates a gravitational pull at both ends of the transaction:
For large portions of the population, a '''10–20% saving''' on everyday services is meaningful — not a luxury, a necessity. When the incumbent extracts 25–35% and WikiDeal charges 5–10%, the difference stays with the service provider '''and''' lowers the price for the client:


* '''Service providers''' earn more per transaction — or can offer lower prices and still earn the same.
* '''Service providers''' earn more per transaction — or can offer lower prices and still earn the same.
* '''Clients''' can access services that were previously unaffordable, or save meaningfully on regular expenditures.
* '''Clients''' access services previously unaffordable, or save meaningfully on regular expenditures.
 
Combined with volunteering to bootstrap (as on Wikipedia) and rewards for contributors, attractive pricing and lower fair commission fees are what make broad adhesion probable. WikiDeal does not serve only affluent, tech-savvy early adopters — it is designed to be accessible and useful to anyone who buys or sells services.
 
== 7. More Flexible, More Options ==
 
WikiDeal is designed to be '''more flexible''' than existing marketplace platforms. Key dimensions:
 
* '''Many contract models''' — employment, volunteering, bike loan, childcare, tutoring, co-housing, and many more — all freely accessible to browse, with lawyer-endorsed versions unlocked via subscription.
* '''[[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:User Groups|User Groups]]''' — autonomous local or thematic communities with their own governance, their own commission rates, and their own contract adaptations.
* '''[[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Miles-Credits|Miles Credits]]''' — a complementary currency enabling exchange of housing, transport, food, and services within [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Rings Of Trust|Rings of Trust]], giving users flexibility beyond cash transactions.
* '''[[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Call:Main|Open Calls]]''' — seasonal community invitations to propose improvements, new contract models, or entirely new marketplace types.
 
Users are not locked into a single offer. They can choose the model that fits their community, their budget, and their values.
 
== 8. Credits Economy ==
 
The WikiDeal ecosystem is powered by the '''Credits Economy''', a multi-faceted digital currency designed for flexibility and community benefit. It comprises:
 
* '''Cash Rewards (no guarantee*)''' 💰 — convertible to CHF, can be cashed out to a bank account; tax applies at cash-out.
* ''Gift (indirect)'' — the difference between the bonding curve total and (Cash + Miles); not a user choice, it flows automatically. See [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Cash-Rewards|Rewards Explained]].
* '''Miles Credits''' 🔗 — usable within Rings (agreements between ≥2 [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:User Groups|User Groups]]); complementary currency with usage coefficients from 1 (restricted) to 10 (widely accepted).
* '''Ring''' — an agreement between at least 2 User Groups that enables Miles Credits interoperability.
 
This tiered system ensures liquidity, incentivizes community contributions, and supports diverse economic interactions, while promoting transparent and fair value exchange.
 
== 9. Trust: Built by Design, Not by Marketing ==
 
Trust is WikiDeal's most fundamental structural asset. Several mechanisms work together:
 
=== Corrective and Compensatory Measures ===
The platform includes built-in corrective measures (dispute resolution via [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Arbitration Chambers|Arbitration Chambers]]) and compensatory options (redress mechanisms within contracts) that give users confidence that problems can be resolved fairly, without resorting to external legal systems.
 
=== 1 User = 1 Vote ===
Governance is participatory: '''1 user = 1 vote'''. Users who contribute to the platform are not just consumers — they are stakeholders with genuine decision-making power. This structure gives users reason to trust that the platform will not be redirected against their interests by a small shareholder group.
 
=== Track Records and Decentralized Data ===
WikiDeal integrates the ability to consult — or to require, in more complex transactions — the '''track record''' of the other party: past transactions, satisfaction ratings, community activity records. Crucially, this data is shared '''only if the parties agree''': decentralized, consent-based data sharing. Both parties can flexibly require or waive the other's track record history, depending on the stakes of the transaction. This mechanism, operating within [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Rings Of Trust|Rings of Trust]], allows trust to be built gradually and contextually — without requiring a centralised surveillance architecture.
 
=== Interests and Community Signals ===
Trust also emerges from shared context: seeing the other party's declared interests, the User Groups they belong to, their volunteering history, or their use of [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Miles-Credits|Miles Credits]] for community exchange. These signals provide a richer, more human picture than a simple star rating.
 
== 10. Subscription Mandatory Only on Transactions: Browse Freely ==
 
A common concern about platform subscriptions is that they create a barrier to entry. WikiDeal addresses this directly:
 
* '''Free access:''' Anyone can browse WikiDeal — read contract models, explore User Groups, consult governance documentation — without any subscription.
* '''Subscription is triggered only at transaction time:''' The [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Subscription|CHF 1/month subscription]] (CHF 10/year) becomes due only when a user signs a contract. If a user browses for months and never transacts, they never pay.
* '''Retroactive billing:''' Overdue subscription months are settled at the time of the next contract signing — no surprise charges between transactions.


What does the subscription unlock? '''Added value''':
Bootstrapped by '''volunteering''' (as on Wikipedia) and sustained by '''rewards for contributors''', attractive pricing and fair, lower commission fees are what make broad adhesion probable.


* '''Smartphone apps''' for mobile access to the full platform.
== 8. More Flexible Services ==
* '''Lawyer-endorsed contracts''' — the [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Peer Endorsement|Peer Endorsement]] layer that makes contracts legally credible and fair.
* Access to the full library of '''ready-to-use contract models'''.
* Full access to dispute resolution mechanisms.


The subscription is not a paywall — it is a membership in a community-governed commons. The value returned exceeds the cost, especially for regular users.
WikiDeal is designed to be '''more flexible''' than existing marketplaces. This lever combines several innovations into everyday flexibility:


== 11. Everything United in One Platform ==
* '''Many contract models''' — employment, volunteering, bike loan, childcare, tutoring, co-housing, and more — freely browsable, with lawyer-endorsed versions unlocked via subscription.
* '''[[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:User Groups|User Groups]]''' — autonomous local or thematic communities with their own governance and adaptations.
* '''[[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Miles-Credits|Miles Credits]]''' — a complementary currency for exchanging housing, transport, food and services within [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Rings Of Trust|Rings of Trust]], beyond cash.
* '''[[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Call:Main|Open Calls]]''' — seasonal invitations to propose improvements, new contract models, or new marketplace types.


One of the [[Gov/en/Portal:Onboarding/Glossary:Founding Question|founding question]]'s key insights is captured in the word "'''A'''" — there should be a single platform, not many fragmented ones. The argument: '''all the small players ally on a single shared platform''' and, together, outcompete the large incumbents — not through acquisition or aggression, but through structural fairness and network effects.
Users are not locked into a single offer — they choose the model that fits their community, budget and values. A '''low subscription barrier''' reinforces this: anyone can browse freely; the [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Subscription|CHF 1/month subscription]] (CHF 10/year) is due only when a contract is signed, never for browsing.


This unity produces practical advantages:
== 9. Dispute Prevention & Trust by Design ==


* '''[[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Rings Of Trust|Rings of Trust]]''' connect User Groups across domains — a babysitter's Miles Credits become usable for tutoring, transport, or festival services as the Rings expand.
For users at large, confidence comes from '''help to prevent and resolve disputes''', not from marketing. This lever combines several trust mechanisms:
* '''Track records follow users across contexts''' — not siloed by domain, but portable across the platform with user consent.
* '''Contract models are shared and improved collectively''' — a legal innovation adopted in one User Group can propagate across the whole ecosystem.
* '''Governance decisions affect the whole platform''' — improvements in arbitration, pricing, or fraud prevention benefit everyone simultaneously.


The alternative many small competing platforms produces fragmentation, duplicated costs, and race-to-the-bottom dynamics. WikiDeal's hypothesis is that a single, well-governed commons is more powerful than many small private silos.
* '''Corrective & compensatory measures''' dispute resolution via [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Arbitration Chambers|Arbitration Chambers]] and redress options within contracts, resolving problems fairly without external legal systems.
* '''Participative Contracts''' open, community-validated agreements (like Wikipedia articles) replace opaque ones, making expectations clear up front and preventing conflict.
* '''1 user = 1 vote''' — participatory governance gives users genuine decision-making power, so the platform cannot be redirected against their interests.
* '''Track records & decentralized, consent-based data''' — parties can consult or require the other's track record, shared only by mutual agreement within [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Rings Of Trust|Rings of Trust]], building trust gradually without centralised surveillance.
* '''Community signals''' — declared interests, User Group membership, volunteering history and Miles Credits use give a richer, more human picture than a star rating.


----
----
Line 162: Line 118:
{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
|-
|-
! Lever !! Mechanism !! Key pages
! Audience !! Lever !! Key pages
|-
| Participative Contracts & Legal Support || Wiki-edited, lawyer-endorsed contract models || [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Peer Endorsement|Peer Endorsement]]
|-
| Exit to Community || Progressive transfer of governance to users || [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Exit To Community|Exit to Community]]
|-
|-
| Efficient Funding Mechanism || Bonding Curve & Funding Stabilizer || [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Bonding Curve|Bonding Curve]]
| A. Early adopters || Commons they co-own (Exit to Community) || [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Exit To Community|Exit to Community]]
|-
|-
| Citizen organic deployment || Community Migrations, Living Labs || [[Gov/en/Portal:Ecosystem/Community-Migrations|Community Migrations]]
| A. Early adopters || Efficient Funding Mechanism || [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Bonding Curve|Bonding Curve]]
|-
|-
| Non-aggressive growth || Living Labs → Migrations → Rings → Open Calls → Scale || [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Research:Main|Research Main]]
| A. Early adopters || Organic deployment rewarding initiative || [[Gov/en/Portal:Ecosystem/Community-Migrations|Community Migrations]]
|-
|-
| Fair commission fees & attractive pricing || 5–15% vs. 10–50% market, at-cost design || [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Revenue-Structure|Revenue Structure]]
| B. Communities & marketplaces || Community Migrations & autonomous User Groups || [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:User Groups|User Groups]]
|-
|-
| Flexible options || User Groups, Miles, Open Calls, contract library || [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Main|Innovations Index]]
| B. Communities & marketplaces || One unified platform (Rings of Trust) || [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Rings Of Trust|Rings of Trust]]
|-
|-
| Credits Economy || Cash Rewards + Miles Credits in Rings || [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Miles-Credits|Miles Credits]]
| C. Legal professionals || Legal facilitation: coaching, contracts, arbitration || [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Peer Endorsement|Peer Endorsement]]
|-
|-
| Trust by design || Arbitration, track records, 1 user = 1 vote || [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Arbitration Chambers|Arbitration Chambers]]
| D. Users at large || Fair commission fees & attractive pricing || [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Revenue-Structure|Revenue Structure]]
|-
|-
| Low subscription barrier || Mandatory only on transaction; browse freely || [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Subscription|Subscription Model]]
| D. Users at large || More flexible services || [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Main|Innovations Index]]
|-
|-
| One unified platform || Rings of Trust, portable track records, shared governance || [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Rings Of Trust|Rings of Trust]]
| D. Users at large || Dispute prevention & trust by design || [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Arbitration Chambers|Arbitration Chambers]]
|}
|}



Latest revision as of 16:44, 15 June 2026

💡 In simple words: This page explains why and how WikiDeal can grow and work for many people around the world. It talks about fair prices, trust, and how everyone can join together to make one big shared marketplace.


⚠️ Not yet approved. This page describes a proposal that is still under community review. It is documented here so it can be discussed, improved and endorsed.


Why and How WikiDeal Can Work: Deployment Strategy & Shared Vision

From WikiDeal, the Wikipedia of e-commerce — R&D Research Portal

This page presents the reasons we believe there is strong growth potential for WikiDeal. It complements the founding research hypothesis — "Can users own, run and sustain a global marketplace?" — with a concrete shared vision and deployment strategy rolled out progressively, through organic market expansion.

These are not promises. WikiDeal is a proof of concept and a citizen science project. But there are substantive reasons to believe the model can achieve broad adhesion. They are laid out here as success levers — the possible sources and drivers of success.

Each lever is a conjunction of several sociotechnical innovations working together. This page does not describe the innovations themselves (see the Innovations Index for that); it describes the competitive advantages that emerge when those innovations combine. The levers are open and expected to evolve over time; these are the initial proposed levers, all subject to community review via the Open Call process.

The levers are presented by audience, in order of appearance — the publics that join WikiDeal one after another as it grows:

  • (A) Early adopters — pioneers, influencers, opinion leaders who launch the platform;
  • (B) Communities & online marketplaces — long-tail and Social & Solidarity Economy networks that migrate in;
  • (C) Legal professionals — lawyers and jurists who formalise and adapt contracts;
  • (D) Users at large — the broad public, whose lower final prices, more flexible services, and built-in dispute prevention make WikiDeal attractive. This last audience (D) is the principal lever for broad deployment: if WikiDeal offers a marketplace with better prices and more flexible services than the competition — bootstrapped by volunteering, as on Wikipedia, and sustained by rewards for contributors — broad adhesion becomes probable rather than merely possible.

A. Early Adopters — Pioneers, Influencers & Opinion Leaders

This first set of levers mobilises the early adopters (pioneers, influencers, opinion leaders): the people who launch User Groups, bring their communities, and contribute both money and ideas to this participative platform. They are drawn by WikiDeal's free culture (open licence and open content) and its purpose as a commons. These levers rest on a body of sociotechnical innovations combined for effect.

1. A Commons They Co-Own: Exit to Community

Early adopters do not merely use WikiDeal — they progressively own and govern it. The Exit to Community lever combines progressive transfer of governance, proportional voting rights tied to participation, and community-elected bodies, so that control increasingly resides with those who use and contribute to the platform. For pioneers, this means their early energy compounds into lasting influence over the platform's direction.

2. Efficient Funding Mechanism

Early supporters who believe in the project receive proportionally greater rewards as it grows. This efficient funding mechanism is a conjunction of innovations — a Bonding Curve (transparent, mathematically fixed issuance of Credits) coupled with a Funding Stabilizer (dynamic recalibration of newly generated Credits between community and individual rewards). Together they give early adopters predictable, adaptive incentives, aligning personal reward with sustainable, community-beneficial growth.

3. Organic Deployment Rewarding Initiative

Markets need not be created from above — they emerge from citizen initiative. Small entrepreneurs, associations and cooperatives launching their own User Groups (babysitting networks, transport cooperatives, tool libraries, artist collectives, tutoring circles) bring both supply and demand simultaneously. This lever combines Community Migrations, Living Labs and a co-opetitive structure: rather than a cold-start marketing campaign, growth is organic, stimulating merit and personal initiative and rewarding those who invest energy in building their community's marketplace. Competition is internal, productive and governed — better service without destructive rivalry.


B. Communities & Online Marketplaces

The second audience is made of existing communities and online marketplaces — from the long tail of niche networks to the broader Social & Solidarity Economy (SSE). These groups already have internal transaction flows and trust relationships; WikiDeal offers them a shared home that multiplies their reach without dissolving their autonomy.

4. Community Migrations & Autonomous User Groups

This lever combines Community Migrations with autonomous User Groups: communities migrate their practices onto WikiDeal's framework while keeping their own governance, their own commission rates, and their own contract adaptations. SSE actors — cooperatives, associations, mutual-aid networks — find a platform whose values (commons, fairness, participation) match their own, and whose tooling lets them scale without surrendering control.

5. One Unified Platform: Rings of Trust

Fragmentation is the enemy of small players. This lever unites them: all the small players ally on a single shared platform and, together, outcompete large incumbents — not through acquisition or aggression, but through structural fairness and network effects. Rings of Trust connect User Groups across domains (a babysitter's Miles Credits become usable for tutoring, transport, or festival services), track records follow users across contexts with consent, and contract models are shared and improved collectively. A single, well-governed commons is more powerful than many small private silos.


C. Legal Professionals — Lawyers & Jurists

A distinctive audience for WikiDeal is the legal profession. Lawyers and jurists are not bystanders here — they have an active, remunerated role that turns legal expertise into a growth lever.

6. Legal Facilitation: Coaching, Contracts & Arbitration

This lever combines collaborative contract editing, peer endorsement, and arbitration into a professional opportunity for jurists:

  • Coaching & contract formalisation — lawyers help formalise and adapt wiki-edited, versioned, community-validated contract models to specific needs, generating income for them.
  • Prevention over cure — by building clear, fair contracts up front, jurists help prevent conflicts rather than litigate them, a more sustainable and reputation-building practice.
  • Peer endorsement — volunteer lawyers endorse models and take named, accountable responsibility (Peer Endorsement), making contracts legally credible across jurisdictions.
  • Arbitration — jurists can participate in dispute resolution via Arbitration Chambers.

A growing library of ready-to-use contract models in free access (employment, volunteering, bike loan, childcare, tutoring, co-housing, and more) is browsable by anyone; lawyer-endorsed versions add legal credibility. For jurists, WikiDeal is a new field of practice that aligns income with conflict prevention.


D. Users at Large — The Principal Lever for Broad Deployment

The broadest audience — and, as stated in the introduction, the principal lever for large-scale deployment — is the general public who buy and sell services. For them, three advantages combine: lower final prices, more flexible services, and built-in help to prevent and resolve disputes.

7. Fair Commission Fees & Attractive Pricing

What matters most for broad adhesion is attractive pricing — a marketplace with better prices than the competition.

WikiDeal's commission hypothesis ranges from 5–15% (vs. 10–50% for most incumbent platforms; see Revenue Structure). This is not zero — those who deploy and operate services must earn a dignified, decent income. The goal is not to impoverish service providers, but to eliminate extreme profit extraction — the winner-takes-all logic of GAFAM and net-economy IPO culture.

WikiDeal escapes this logic by design. As a commons — governed by Exit to Community and structured around co-opetition — it does not need to conquer. It can grow without buying or destroying competitors, uniting the strength of the small (unir la force des petits) against the large incumbents through structural fairness.

For large portions of the population, a 10–20% saving on everyday services is meaningful — not a luxury, a necessity. When the incumbent extracts 25–35% and WikiDeal charges 5–10%, the difference stays with the service provider and lowers the price for the client:

  • Service providers earn more per transaction — or can offer lower prices and still earn the same.
  • Clients access services previously unaffordable, or save meaningfully on regular expenditures.

Bootstrapped by volunteering (as on Wikipedia) and sustained by rewards for contributors, attractive pricing and fair, lower commission fees are what make broad adhesion probable.

8. More Flexible Services

WikiDeal is designed to be more flexible than existing marketplaces. This lever combines several innovations into everyday flexibility:

  • Many contract models — employment, volunteering, bike loan, childcare, tutoring, co-housing, and more — freely browsable, with lawyer-endorsed versions unlocked via subscription.
  • User Groups — autonomous local or thematic communities with their own governance and adaptations.
  • Miles Credits — a complementary currency for exchanging housing, transport, food and services within Rings of Trust, beyond cash.
  • Open Calls — seasonal invitations to propose improvements, new contract models, or new marketplace types.

Users are not locked into a single offer — they choose the model that fits their community, budget and values. A low subscription barrier reinforces this: anyone can browse freely; the CHF 1/month subscription (CHF 10/year) is due only when a contract is signed, never for browsing.

9. Dispute Prevention & Trust by Design

For users at large, confidence comes from help to prevent and resolve disputes, not from marketing. This lever combines several trust mechanisms:

  • Corrective & compensatory measures — dispute resolution via Arbitration Chambers and redress options within contracts, resolving problems fairly without external legal systems.
  • Participative Contracts — open, community-validated agreements (like Wikipedia articles) replace opaque ones, making expectations clear up front and preventing conflict.
  • 1 user = 1 vote — participatory governance gives users genuine decision-making power, so the platform cannot be redirected against their interests.
  • Track records & decentralized, consent-based data — parties can consult or require the other's track record, shared only by mutual agreement within Rings of Trust, building trust gradually without centralised surveillance.
  • Community signals — declared interests, User Group membership, volunteering history and Miles Credits use give a richer, more human picture than a star rating.

Summary: The Shared Vision

Audience Lever Key pages
A. Early adopters Commons they co-own (Exit to Community) Exit to Community
A. Early adopters Efficient Funding Mechanism Bonding Curve
A. Early adopters Organic deployment rewarding initiative Community Migrations
B. Communities & marketplaces Community Migrations & autonomous User Groups User Groups
B. Communities & marketplaces One unified platform (Rings of Trust) Rings of Trust
C. Legal professionals Legal facilitation: coaching, contracts, arbitration Peer Endorsement
D. Users at large Fair commission fees & attractive pricing Revenue Structure
D. Users at large More flexible services Innovations Index
D. Users at large Dispute prevention & trust by design Arbitration Chambers

WikiDeal is not a promise of success. It is a structured hypothesis, pursued as citizen science, with a deployment strategy designed to make broad adhesion probable rather than merely possible. These are the reasons we believe there is strong growth potential.


See Also