Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Research:Why-And-How-It-Can-Work: Difference between revisions
m AI-Admin-Assistant moved page Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Research:How-And-Why-It-Can-Work to Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Research:Why-And-How-It-Can-Work: Rename per Theo: Why and How (not How and Why) |
Restructure: merge foundational levers + arguments into one numbered list (11 levers) in two phases A/B (early adopters / users after); add TOC; add legal support & contract models; rename to "Fair Commission Fees & Attractive Pricing" and "Efficient Funding Mechanism"; reference Innovations:Main |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
These are not promises. WikiDeal is a [[Gov/en/Portal:Onboarding/Glossary:Founding Question|proof of concept]] and a citizen science project. But there are substantive reasons to believe the model can achieve broad adhesion. They are laid out here. | These are not promises. WikiDeal is a [[Gov/en/Portal:Onboarding/Glossary:Founding Question|proof of concept]] and a citizen science project. But there are substantive reasons to believe the model can achieve broad adhesion. They are laid out here. | ||
Below are the '''success levers''' — the possible sources and drivers of success — that together constitute the economic and social engine of WikiDeal Prototype 1. They are interconnected: changes to one affect the others. These are the '''initial proposed levers for success'''; the list is open and expected to evolve over time as the model develops. All are subject to community review via the [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Call:Main|Open Call]] process. | |||
The levers are grouped in two phases: '''(A) levers to start''' — what attracts the early adopters, pioneers and opinion leaders who launch the platform — and '''(B) levers to last''' — what keeps the broader public engaged once the platform is running. | |||
__TOC__ | |||
---- | ---- | ||
= | = A. Levers to Start — Early Adopters, Pioneers & Opinion Leaders = | ||
This first set of levers is what mobilises the '''early adopters''' (alias pioneers, influencers, opinion leaders): the people who launch User Groups, bring their communities, and contribute both '''money and ideas''' to the platform. They are drawn by WikiDeal's free culture (open licence and open content) and its purpose as a '''commons'''. WikiDeal also rests on a body of '''sociotechnical innovations''' — see the [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Main|Innovations Index]] for the full set. | |||
== | == 1. Participative Contracts & Legal Support == | ||
At the core of WikiDeal are '''Participative Contracts''': open, transparent agreements, co-created and validated by the community, much like Wikipedia articles. They replace traditional opaque contracts, ensuring fairness and accountability in every Transaction. Community validation — voting and peer review — ensures contracts evolve to meet the needs of all participants, fostering trust and shared ownership. | At the core of WikiDeal are '''Participative Contracts''': open, transparent agreements, co-created and validated by the community, much like Wikipedia articles. They replace traditional opaque contracts, ensuring fairness and accountability in every Transaction. Community validation — voting and peer review — ensures contracts evolve to meet the needs of all participants, fostering trust and shared ownership. | ||
Contracts on WikiDeal are [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Collaborative Contract Editing|wiki-edited, versioned, and community-validated]] — like Wikipedia articles, but for legal agreements. They evolve as the community's understanding improves. | |||
'''Legal support and ready-to-use contract models''' are a central draw for early adopters: | |||
* ''' | * A growing library of '''ready-to-use contract models''': employment agreements, volunteering contracts, bike-loan agreements, childcare arrangements, tutoring, co-housing, and many more. | ||
* '''Volunteer lawyers endorse''' these models and take named, accountable responsibility ([[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Peer Endorsement|Peer Endorsement]]), making contracts legally credible and fair. | |||
* ''' | * As the community grows, more endorsed contract models become available in more jurisdictions, reducing friction for international transactions. | ||
* | |||
This | This combination of transparency, fluidity, legal backing and accountability is rare in the marketplace economy. | ||
== | == 2. Exit to Community == | ||
WikiDeal is built on '''[[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Exit To Community|Exit to Community]]''', a progressive model for transferring governance and ownership from the founding Ynternet.org Foundation to the collective of its User Groups. As the platform grows, its direction and control increasingly reside with those who use and contribute to it — through proportional voting rights tied to participation, community-elected governance bodies, and phased decentralization of decision-making power. | WikiDeal is built on '''[[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Exit To Community|Exit to Community]]''', a progressive model for transferring governance and ownership from the founding Ynternet.org Foundation to the collective of its User Groups. As the platform grows, its direction and control increasingly reside with those who use and contribute to it — through proportional voting rights tied to participation, community-elected governance bodies, and phased decentralization of decision-making power. | ||
== | == 3. Efficient Funding Mechanism == | ||
Financial stability and growth are secured by a '''Bonding Curve & Funding Stabilizer''' dual algorithm. The '''Bonding Curve''' is a transparent, mathematically fixed mechanism governing the issuance of Credits and their value, rewarding early adopters and ensuring predictable funding. The '''[[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Funding Stabilizer|Funding Stabilizer]]''' is a dynamic adjustment layer that responds to the platform's financial health, automatically recalibrating the distribution of newly generated Credits between community and individual rewards. Together they provide long-term predictability and adaptive responsiveness, aligning incentives for sustainable growth and community benefit. | Financial stability and growth are secured by an '''efficient funding mechanism''': a '''[[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Bonding Curve|Bonding Curve]] & Funding Stabilizer''' dual algorithm. The '''Bonding Curve''' is a transparent, mathematically fixed mechanism governing the issuance of Credits and their value, rewarding early adopters and ensuring predictable funding. The '''[[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Funding Stabilizer|Funding Stabilizer]]''' is a dynamic adjustment layer that responds to the platform's financial health, automatically recalibrating the distribution of newly generated Credits between community and individual rewards. Together they provide long-term predictability and adaptive responsiveness, aligning incentives for sustainable growth and community benefit. | ||
---- | '''Early Supporters fund the foundation:''' the Bonding Curve and [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Why-Fund-WikiDeal|funding model]] ensure that those who believe in the project early receive proportionally greater rewards as it grows. | ||
== 4. Citizen Initiatives: Organic Market Deployment == | |||
One of WikiDeal's core deployment hypotheses is that '''markets need not be created from above''' — they can emerge organically from citizen initiative. Small entrepreneurs, associations, and cooperatives launching their own User Groups (babysitting networks, local transport cooperatives, tool libraries, artist collectives, tutoring circles) bring both supply and demand simultaneously when they migrate to WikiDeal. | |||
This is what [[Gov/en/Portal:Ecosystem/Community-Migrations|Community Migrations]] are designed for. Existing communities — those that already have internal transaction flows and trust relationships — migrate their practices onto WikiDeal's framework. Rather than a cold-start marketing campaign, this is organic market deployment: stimulating '''merit''' and '''personal initiative''', rewarding those who invest energy in building their community's marketplace. | |||
The [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Coopetition|co-opetitive]] structure means that User Groups have more incentive to improve their own quality than to fight over external users. The competition is internal, productive, and governed — producing better service without destructive rivalry. | |||
== 5. A Deployment Strategy That Grows Without Conquest == | |||
The deployment strategy is progressive and non-aggressive: | |||
# '''Living Labs first:''' [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:User Groups|User Groups]] launch as Living Labs — small-scale, real-world experiments in specific domains (babysitting, tutoring, tool libraries, etc.). | |||
# '''Community Migrations:''' Existing cooperatives and associations migrate to WikiDeal, bringing their users and transaction flows. | |||
# '''Rings of Trust expand:''' As more User Groups join, Miles Credits become more widely usable, increasing the network's value. | |||
# '''Open Calls drive innovation:''' The community proposes, debates, and adopts improvements through seasonal [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Call:Main|Open Calls]]. | |||
# '''Early Supporters fund the foundation:''' The [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Bonding Curve|Bonding Curve]] and [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Why-Fund-WikiDeal|funding model]] ensure that those who believe in the project early receive proportionally greater rewards as it grows. | |||
# '''Volunteer lawyers expand legal coverage:''' As the community grows, more endorsed contract models become available in more jurisdictions, reducing friction for international transactions. | |||
At no stage does WikiDeal need to acquire a competitor, launch an aggressive advertising campaign, or exploit its user base to grow. The growth is structural: each new User Group, Ring of Trust, and endorsed contract adds value to the whole ecosystem. | |||
---- | ---- | ||
= | = B. Levers to Last — Users After the Early Adopters = | ||
Once the platform is launched by its pioneers, this second set of levers is what attracts and retains the '''broader public''' — the everyday users who buy and sell services after the early adopters. For them, what matters most is attractive pricing, flexibility, trust, and a single place where everything works together. | |||
== 6. Fair Commission Fees & Attractive Pricing == | |||
What matters most for broad adhesion is '''attractive pricing''' — a marketplace with better prices and more flexible services than the competition. | |||
---- | WikiDeal's commission hypothesis ranges from '''5–15%''' (vs. 10–50% for most incumbent platforms). See [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Revenue-Structure|Revenue Structure]] for the complete model. This is '''not zero''' — those who deploy and operate services on WikiDeal must earn a '''dignified, decent income'''. The goal is not to impoverish service providers. The goal is to eliminate '''extreme profit extraction''' — the binary logic of the GAFAM and net-economy IPO culture, which operates on a winner-takes-all dynamic. | ||
WikiDeal escapes this logic by design. Because the platform is a commons — governed by the [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Exit To Community|Exit to Community]] principle and structured around [[Gov/en/Portal:Ecosystem/Coopetition|co-opetition]] — it does not need to conquer. It can grow '''without being forced to buy or destroy competitors'''. Instead, the strategy is to '''unite the strength of the small''' (''unir la force des petits''): all the small players — independent service providers, cooperatives, citizen initiatives — can ally on a single commons platform and, together, outcompete the large incumbents, not through aggression, but through structural fairness. | |||
For large portions of the population, a '''10–20% saving''' on everyday services is economically meaningful — not a luxury, a necessity. Transport, housing, childcare, household services: when the incumbent platform extracts 25–35% and WikiDeal charges 5–10%, the difference stays in the pocket of the service provider '''and''' reflects in the price offered to the client. This creates a gravitational pull at both ends of the transaction: | |||
* '''Service providers''' earn more per transaction — or can offer lower prices and still earn the same. | |||
* '''Clients''' can access services that were previously unaffordable, or save meaningfully on regular expenditures. | |||
Combined with volunteering to bootstrap (as on Wikipedia) and rewards for contributors, attractive pricing and lower fair commission fees are what make broad adhesion probable. WikiDeal does not serve only affluent, tech-savvy early adopters — it is designed to be accessible and useful to anyone who buys or sells services. | |||
== 7. More Flexible, More Options == | |||
WikiDeal is designed to be '''more flexible''' than existing marketplace platforms. Key dimensions: | |||
* '''Many contract models''' — employment, volunteering, bike loan, childcare, tutoring, co-housing, and many more — all freely accessible to browse, with lawyer-endorsed versions unlocked via subscription. | |||
* '''[[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:User Groups|User Groups]]''' — autonomous local or thematic communities with their own governance, their own commission rates, and their own contract adaptations. | |||
* '''[[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Miles-Credits|Miles Credits]]''' — a complementary currency enabling exchange of housing, transport, food, and services within [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Rings Of Trust|Rings of Trust]], giving users flexibility beyond cash transactions. | |||
* '''[[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Call:Main|Open Calls]]''' — seasonal community invitations to propose improvements, new contract models, or entirely new marketplace types. | |||
Users are not locked into a single offer. They can choose the model that fits their community, their budget, and their values. | |||
== 8. Credits Economy == | |||
The WikiDeal ecosystem is powered by the '''Credits Economy''', a multi-faceted digital currency designed for flexibility and community benefit. It comprises: | |||
* '''Cash Rewards (no guarantee*)''' 💰 — convertible to CHF, can be cashed out to a bank account; tax applies at cash-out. | |||
* ''Gift (indirect)'' — the difference between the bonding curve total and (Cash + Miles); not a user choice, it flows automatically. See [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Cash-Rewards|Rewards Explained]]. | |||
* '''Miles Credits''' 🔗 — usable within Rings (agreements between ≥2 [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:User Groups|User Groups]]); complementary currency with usage coefficients from 1 (restricted) to 10 (widely accepted). | |||
* '''Ring''' — an agreement between at least 2 User Groups that enables Miles Credits interoperability. | |||
This tiered system ensures liquidity, incentivizes community contributions, and supports diverse economic interactions, while promoting transparent and fair value exchange. | |||
== | == 9. Trust: Built by Design, Not by Marketing == | ||
Trust is WikiDeal's most fundamental structural asset. Several mechanisms work together: | Trust is WikiDeal's most fundamental structural asset. Several mechanisms work together: | ||
| Line 95: | Line 116: | ||
=== Corrective and Compensatory Measures === | === Corrective and Compensatory Measures === | ||
The platform includes built-in corrective measures (dispute resolution via [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Arbitration Chambers|Arbitration Chambers]]) and compensatory options (redress mechanisms within contracts) that give users confidence that problems can be resolved fairly, without resorting to external legal systems. | The platform includes built-in corrective measures (dispute resolution via [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Arbitration Chambers|Arbitration Chambers]]) and compensatory options (redress mechanisms within contracts) that give users confidence that problems can be resolved fairly, without resorting to external legal systems. | ||
=== 1 User = 1 Vote === | === 1 User = 1 Vote === | ||
| Line 108: | Line 126: | ||
Trust also emerges from shared context: seeing the other party's declared interests, the User Groups they belong to, their volunteering history, or their use of [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Miles-Credits|Miles Credits]] for community exchange. These signals provide a richer, more human picture than a simple star rating. | Trust also emerges from shared context: seeing the other party's declared interests, the User Groups they belong to, their volunteering history, or their use of [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Miles-Credits|Miles Credits]] for community exchange. These signals provide a richer, more human picture than a simple star rating. | ||
== 10. Subscription Mandatory Only on Transactions: Browse Freely == | |||
== | |||
A common concern about platform subscriptions is that they create a barrier to entry. WikiDeal addresses this directly: | A common concern about platform subscriptions is that they create a barrier to entry. WikiDeal addresses this directly: | ||
| Line 122: | Line 138: | ||
* '''Smartphone apps''' for mobile access to the full platform. | * '''Smartphone apps''' for mobile access to the full platform. | ||
* '''Lawyer-endorsed contracts''' — the [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Peer Endorsement|Peer Endorsement]] layer that makes contracts legally credible and fair. | * '''Lawyer-endorsed contracts''' — the [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Peer Endorsement|Peer Endorsement]] layer that makes contracts legally credible and fair. | ||
* Access to the full library of '''ready-to-use contract models''' | * Access to the full library of '''ready-to-use contract models'''. | ||
* Full access to dispute resolution mechanisms. | * Full access to dispute resolution mechanisms. | ||
The subscription is not a paywall — it is a membership in a community-governed commons. The value returned exceeds the cost, especially for regular users. | The subscription is not a paywall — it is a membership in a community-governed commons. The value returned exceeds the cost, especially for regular users. | ||
== 11. Everything United in One Platform == | |||
== | |||
One of the [[Gov/en/Portal:Onboarding/Glossary:Founding Question|founding question]]'s key insights is captured in the word "'''A'''" — there should be a single platform, not many fragmented ones. The argument: '''all the small players ally on a single shared platform''' and, together, outcompete the large incumbents — not through acquisition or aggression, but through structural fairness and network effects. | One of the [[Gov/en/Portal:Onboarding/Glossary:Founding Question|founding question]]'s key insights is captured in the word "'''A'''" — there should be a single platform, not many fragmented ones. The argument: '''all the small players ally on a single shared platform''' and, together, outcompete the large incumbents — not through acquisition or aggression, but through structural fairness and network effects. | ||
| Line 141: | Line 155: | ||
The alternative — many small competing platforms — produces fragmentation, duplicated costs, and race-to-the-bottom dynamics. WikiDeal's hypothesis is that a single, well-governed commons is more powerful than many small private silos. | The alternative — many small competing platforms — produces fragmentation, duplicated costs, and race-to-the-bottom dynamics. WikiDeal's hypothesis is that a single, well-governed commons is more powerful than many small private silos. | ||
---- | ---- | ||
| Line 163: | Line 162: | ||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
|- | |- | ||
! | ! Lever !! Mechanism !! Key pages | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | Participative Contracts & Legal Support || Wiki-edited, lawyer-endorsed contract models || [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Peer Endorsement|Peer Endorsement]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | Exit to Community || Progressive transfer of governance to users || [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Exit To Community|Exit to Community]] | ||
|- | |||
| Efficient Funding Mechanism || Bonding Curve & Funding Stabilizer || [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Bonding Curve|Bonding Curve]] | |||
|- | |- | ||
| Citizen organic deployment || Community Migrations, Living Labs || [[Gov/en/Portal:Ecosystem/Community-Migrations|Community Migrations]] | | Citizen organic deployment || Community Migrations, Living Labs || [[Gov/en/Portal:Ecosystem/Community-Migrations|Community Migrations]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | Non-aggressive growth || Living Labs → Migrations → Rings → Open Calls → Scale || [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Research:Main|Research Main]] | ||
|- | |||
| Fair commission fees & attractive pricing || 5–15% vs. 10–50% market, at-cost design || [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Revenue-Structure|Revenue Structure]] | |||
|- | |||
| Flexible options || User Groups, Miles, Open Calls, contract library || [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Main|Innovations Index]] | |||
|- | |- | ||
| Trust by design || Arbitration | | Credits Economy || Cash Rewards + Miles Credits in Rings || [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Miles-Credits|Miles Credits]] | ||
|- | |||
| Trust by design || Arbitration, track records, 1 user = 1 vote || [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Arbitration Chambers|Arbitration Chambers]] | |||
|- | |- | ||
| Low subscription barrier || Mandatory only on transaction; browse freely || [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Subscription|Subscription Model]] | | Low subscription barrier || Mandatory only on transaction; browse freely || [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Subscription|Subscription Model]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| One unified platform || Rings of Trust, portable track records, shared governance || [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Rings Of Trust|Rings of Trust]] | | One unified platform || Rings of Trust, portable track records, shared governance || [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Rings Of Trust|Rings of Trust]] | ||
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 16:27, 15 June 2026
💡 In simple words: This page explains why and how WikiDeal can grow and work for many people around the world. It talks about fair prices, trust, and how everyone can join together to make one big shared marketplace.
⚠️ Not yet approved. This page describes a proposal that is still under community review. It is documented here so it can be discussed, improved and endorsed.
From WikiDeal, the Wikipedia of e-commerce — R&D Research Portal
This page presents the reasons we believe there is strong growth potential for WikiDeal. It complements the founding research hypothesis — "Can users own, run and sustain a global marketplace?" — with a concrete shared vision and deployment strategy rolled out progressively, through organic market expansion.
These are not promises. WikiDeal is a proof of concept and a citizen science project. But there are substantive reasons to believe the model can achieve broad adhesion. They are laid out here.
Below are the success levers — the possible sources and drivers of success — that together constitute the economic and social engine of WikiDeal Prototype 1. They are interconnected: changes to one affect the others. These are the initial proposed levers for success; the list is open and expected to evolve over time as the model develops. All are subject to community review via the Open Call process.
The levers are grouped in two phases: (A) levers to start — what attracts the early adopters, pioneers and opinion leaders who launch the platform — and (B) levers to last — what keeps the broader public engaged once the platform is running.
A. Levers to Start — Early Adopters, Pioneers & Opinion Leaders
This first set of levers is what mobilises the early adopters (alias pioneers, influencers, opinion leaders): the people who launch User Groups, bring their communities, and contribute both money and ideas to the platform. They are drawn by WikiDeal's free culture (open licence and open content) and its purpose as a commons. WikiDeal also rests on a body of sociotechnical innovations — see the Innovations Index for the full set.
1. Participative Contracts & Legal Support
At the core of WikiDeal are Participative Contracts: open, transparent agreements, co-created and validated by the community, much like Wikipedia articles. They replace traditional opaque contracts, ensuring fairness and accountability in every Transaction. Community validation — voting and peer review — ensures contracts evolve to meet the needs of all participants, fostering trust and shared ownership.
Contracts on WikiDeal are wiki-edited, versioned, and community-validated — like Wikipedia articles, but for legal agreements. They evolve as the community's understanding improves.
Legal support and ready-to-use contract models are a central draw for early adopters:
- A growing library of ready-to-use contract models: employment agreements, volunteering contracts, bike-loan agreements, childcare arrangements, tutoring, co-housing, and many more.
- Volunteer lawyers endorse these models and take named, accountable responsibility (Peer Endorsement), making contracts legally credible and fair.
- As the community grows, more endorsed contract models become available in more jurisdictions, reducing friction for international transactions.
This combination of transparency, fluidity, legal backing and accountability is rare in the marketplace economy.
2. Exit to Community
WikiDeal is built on Exit to Community, a progressive model for transferring governance and ownership from the founding Ynternet.org Foundation to the collective of its User Groups. As the platform grows, its direction and control increasingly reside with those who use and contribute to it — through proportional voting rights tied to participation, community-elected governance bodies, and phased decentralization of decision-making power.
3. Efficient Funding Mechanism
Financial stability and growth are secured by an efficient funding mechanism: a Bonding Curve & Funding Stabilizer dual algorithm. The Bonding Curve is a transparent, mathematically fixed mechanism governing the issuance of Credits and their value, rewarding early adopters and ensuring predictable funding. The Funding Stabilizer is a dynamic adjustment layer that responds to the platform's financial health, automatically recalibrating the distribution of newly generated Credits between community and individual rewards. Together they provide long-term predictability and adaptive responsiveness, aligning incentives for sustainable growth and community benefit.
Early Supporters fund the foundation: the Bonding Curve and funding model ensure that those who believe in the project early receive proportionally greater rewards as it grows.
4. Citizen Initiatives: Organic Market Deployment
One of WikiDeal's core deployment hypotheses is that markets need not be created from above — they can emerge organically from citizen initiative. Small entrepreneurs, associations, and cooperatives launching their own User Groups (babysitting networks, local transport cooperatives, tool libraries, artist collectives, tutoring circles) bring both supply and demand simultaneously when they migrate to WikiDeal.
This is what Community Migrations are designed for. Existing communities — those that already have internal transaction flows and trust relationships — migrate their practices onto WikiDeal's framework. Rather than a cold-start marketing campaign, this is organic market deployment: stimulating merit and personal initiative, rewarding those who invest energy in building their community's marketplace.
The co-opetitive structure means that User Groups have more incentive to improve their own quality than to fight over external users. The competition is internal, productive, and governed — producing better service without destructive rivalry.
5. A Deployment Strategy That Grows Without Conquest
The deployment strategy is progressive and non-aggressive:
- Living Labs first: User Groups launch as Living Labs — small-scale, real-world experiments in specific domains (babysitting, tutoring, tool libraries, etc.).
- Community Migrations: Existing cooperatives and associations migrate to WikiDeal, bringing their users and transaction flows.
- Rings of Trust expand: As more User Groups join, Miles Credits become more widely usable, increasing the network's value.
- Open Calls drive innovation: The community proposes, debates, and adopts improvements through seasonal Open Calls.
- Early Supporters fund the foundation: The Bonding Curve and funding model ensure that those who believe in the project early receive proportionally greater rewards as it grows.
- Volunteer lawyers expand legal coverage: As the community grows, more endorsed contract models become available in more jurisdictions, reducing friction for international transactions.
At no stage does WikiDeal need to acquire a competitor, launch an aggressive advertising campaign, or exploit its user base to grow. The growth is structural: each new User Group, Ring of Trust, and endorsed contract adds value to the whole ecosystem.
B. Levers to Last — Users After the Early Adopters
Once the platform is launched by its pioneers, this second set of levers is what attracts and retains the broader public — the everyday users who buy and sell services after the early adopters. For them, what matters most is attractive pricing, flexibility, trust, and a single place where everything works together.
6. Fair Commission Fees & Attractive Pricing
What matters most for broad adhesion is attractive pricing — a marketplace with better prices and more flexible services than the competition.
WikiDeal's commission hypothesis ranges from 5–15% (vs. 10–50% for most incumbent platforms). See Revenue Structure for the complete model. This is not zero — those who deploy and operate services on WikiDeal must earn a dignified, decent income. The goal is not to impoverish service providers. The goal is to eliminate extreme profit extraction — the binary logic of the GAFAM and net-economy IPO culture, which operates on a winner-takes-all dynamic.
WikiDeal escapes this logic by design. Because the platform is a commons — governed by the Exit to Community principle and structured around co-opetition — it does not need to conquer. It can grow without being forced to buy or destroy competitors. Instead, the strategy is to unite the strength of the small (unir la force des petits): all the small players — independent service providers, cooperatives, citizen initiatives — can ally on a single commons platform and, together, outcompete the large incumbents, not through aggression, but through structural fairness.
For large portions of the population, a 10–20% saving on everyday services is economically meaningful — not a luxury, a necessity. Transport, housing, childcare, household services: when the incumbent platform extracts 25–35% and WikiDeal charges 5–10%, the difference stays in the pocket of the service provider and reflects in the price offered to the client. This creates a gravitational pull at both ends of the transaction:
- Service providers earn more per transaction — or can offer lower prices and still earn the same.
- Clients can access services that were previously unaffordable, or save meaningfully on regular expenditures.
Combined with volunteering to bootstrap (as on Wikipedia) and rewards for contributors, attractive pricing and lower fair commission fees are what make broad adhesion probable. WikiDeal does not serve only affluent, tech-savvy early adopters — it is designed to be accessible and useful to anyone who buys or sells services.
7. More Flexible, More Options
WikiDeal is designed to be more flexible than existing marketplace platforms. Key dimensions:
- Many contract models — employment, volunteering, bike loan, childcare, tutoring, co-housing, and many more — all freely accessible to browse, with lawyer-endorsed versions unlocked via subscription.
- User Groups — autonomous local or thematic communities with their own governance, their own commission rates, and their own contract adaptations.
- Miles Credits — a complementary currency enabling exchange of housing, transport, food, and services within Rings of Trust, giving users flexibility beyond cash transactions.
- Open Calls — seasonal community invitations to propose improvements, new contract models, or entirely new marketplace types.
Users are not locked into a single offer. They can choose the model that fits their community, their budget, and their values.
8. Credits Economy
The WikiDeal ecosystem is powered by the Credits Economy, a multi-faceted digital currency designed for flexibility and community benefit. It comprises:
- Cash Rewards (no guarantee*) 💰 — convertible to CHF, can be cashed out to a bank account; tax applies at cash-out.
- Gift (indirect) — the difference between the bonding curve total and (Cash + Miles); not a user choice, it flows automatically. See Rewards Explained.
- Miles Credits 🔗 — usable within Rings (agreements between ≥2 User Groups); complementary currency with usage coefficients from 1 (restricted) to 10 (widely accepted).
- Ring — an agreement between at least 2 User Groups that enables Miles Credits interoperability.
This tiered system ensures liquidity, incentivizes community contributions, and supports diverse economic interactions, while promoting transparent and fair value exchange.
9. Trust: Built by Design, Not by Marketing
Trust is WikiDeal's most fundamental structural asset. Several mechanisms work together:
Corrective and Compensatory Measures
The platform includes built-in corrective measures (dispute resolution via Arbitration Chambers) and compensatory options (redress mechanisms within contracts) that give users confidence that problems can be resolved fairly, without resorting to external legal systems.
1 User = 1 Vote
Governance is participatory: 1 user = 1 vote. Users who contribute to the platform are not just consumers — they are stakeholders with genuine decision-making power. This structure gives users reason to trust that the platform will not be redirected against their interests by a small shareholder group.
Track Records and Decentralized Data
WikiDeal integrates the ability to consult — or to require, in more complex transactions — the track record of the other party: past transactions, satisfaction ratings, community activity records. Crucially, this data is shared only if the parties agree: decentralized, consent-based data sharing. Both parties can flexibly require or waive the other's track record history, depending on the stakes of the transaction. This mechanism, operating within Rings of Trust, allows trust to be built gradually and contextually — without requiring a centralised surveillance architecture.
Interests and Community Signals
Trust also emerges from shared context: seeing the other party's declared interests, the User Groups they belong to, their volunteering history, or their use of Miles Credits for community exchange. These signals provide a richer, more human picture than a simple star rating.
10. Subscription Mandatory Only on Transactions: Browse Freely
A common concern about platform subscriptions is that they create a barrier to entry. WikiDeal addresses this directly:
- Free access: Anyone can browse WikiDeal — read contract models, explore User Groups, consult governance documentation — without any subscription.
- Subscription is triggered only at transaction time: The CHF 1/month subscription (CHF 10/year) becomes due only when a user signs a contract. If a user browses for months and never transacts, they never pay.
- Retroactive billing: Overdue subscription months are settled at the time of the next contract signing — no surprise charges between transactions.
What does the subscription unlock? Added value:
- Smartphone apps for mobile access to the full platform.
- Lawyer-endorsed contracts — the Peer Endorsement layer that makes contracts legally credible and fair.
- Access to the full library of ready-to-use contract models.
- Full access to dispute resolution mechanisms.
The subscription is not a paywall — it is a membership in a community-governed commons. The value returned exceeds the cost, especially for regular users.
11. Everything United in One Platform
One of the founding question's key insights is captured in the word "A" — there should be a single platform, not many fragmented ones. The argument: all the small players ally on a single shared platform and, together, outcompete the large incumbents — not through acquisition or aggression, but through structural fairness and network effects.
This unity produces practical advantages:
- Rings of Trust connect User Groups across domains — a babysitter's Miles Credits become usable for tutoring, transport, or festival services as the Rings expand.
- Track records follow users across contexts — not siloed by domain, but portable across the platform with user consent.
- Contract models are shared and improved collectively — a legal innovation adopted in one User Group can propagate across the whole ecosystem.
- Governance decisions affect the whole platform — improvements in arbitration, pricing, or fraud prevention benefit everyone simultaneously.
The alternative — many small competing platforms — produces fragmentation, duplicated costs, and race-to-the-bottom dynamics. WikiDeal's hypothesis is that a single, well-governed commons is more powerful than many small private silos.
| Lever | Mechanism | Key pages |
|---|---|---|
| Participative Contracts & Legal Support | Wiki-edited, lawyer-endorsed contract models | Peer Endorsement |
| Exit to Community | Progressive transfer of governance to users | Exit to Community |
| Efficient Funding Mechanism | Bonding Curve & Funding Stabilizer | Bonding Curve |
| Citizen organic deployment | Community Migrations, Living Labs | Community Migrations |
| Non-aggressive growth | Living Labs → Migrations → Rings → Open Calls → Scale | Research Main |
| Fair commission fees & attractive pricing | 5–15% vs. 10–50% market, at-cost design | Revenue Structure |
| Flexible options | User Groups, Miles, Open Calls, contract library | Innovations Index |
| Credits Economy | Cash Rewards + Miles Credits in Rings | Miles Credits |
| Trust by design | Arbitration, track records, 1 user = 1 vote | Arbitration Chambers |
| Low subscription barrier | Mandatory only on transaction; browse freely | Subscription Model |
| One unified platform | Rings of Trust, portable track records, shared governance | Rings of Trust |
WikiDeal is not a promise of success. It is a structured hypothesis, pursued as citizen science, with a deployment strategy designed to make broad adhesion probable rather than merely possible. These are the reasons we believe there is strong growth potential.