Jump to content
Gov  ·  Market  ·  User Groups  ·  Recent changes  ·  Get started

Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Research:Why-And-How-It-Can-Work: Difference between revisions

From WikiDeal
Title/heading: "How and Why" -> "Why and How" (per Theo)
Restructure by audience (A early adopters / B communities & SSE marketplaces / C legal professionals / D users at large = principal lever); levers as conjunctions of innovations (not innovation listings); add legal facilitation; fair commission fees & attractive pricing; efficient funding mechanism; TOC
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 8: Line 8:
This page presents the reasons we believe there is strong growth potential for WikiDeal. It complements the [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Research:Main|founding research hypothesis]] — "[[Gov/en/Portal:Onboarding/Glossary:Founding Question|Can users own, run and sustain a global marketplace?]]" — with a concrete '''shared vision''' and '''deployment strategy''' rolled out progressively, through organic market expansion.
This page presents the reasons we believe there is strong growth potential for WikiDeal. It complements the [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Research:Main|founding research hypothesis]] — "[[Gov/en/Portal:Onboarding/Glossary:Founding Question|Can users own, run and sustain a global marketplace?]]" — with a concrete '''shared vision''' and '''deployment strategy''' rolled out progressively, through organic market expansion.


These are not promises. WikiDeal is a [[Gov/en/Portal:Onboarding/Glossary:Founding Question|proof of concept]] and a citizen science project. But there are substantive reasons to believe the model can achieve broad adhesion. They are laid out here.
These are not promises. WikiDeal is a [[Gov/en/Portal:Onboarding/Glossary:Founding Question|proof of concept]] and a citizen science project. But there are substantive reasons to believe the model can achieve broad adhesion. They are laid out here as '''success levers''' — the possible sources and drivers of success.


----
Each lever is a '''conjunction of several [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Main|sociotechnical innovations]]''' working together. This page does '''not''' describe the innovations themselves (see the [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Main|Innovations Index]] for that); it describes the '''competitive advantages''' that emerge when those innovations combine. The levers are open and expected to evolve over time; these are the initial proposed levers, all subject to community review via the [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Call:Main|Open Call]] process.
 
== Foundational Success Levers ==
 
Before the arguments below, here are the '''success levers''' that together constitute the economic engine of WikiDeal Prototype 1. They are interconnected: changes to one affect the others. These are the '''initial proposed levers for success''' — the list is open and expected to evolve over time as the model develops. All are subject to community review via the [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Call:Main|Open Call]] process.


=== Lever 1 Participative Contracts (wiki-based, community-validated) ===
The levers are presented '''by audience, in order of appearance''' the publics that join WikiDeal one after another as it grows:


At the core of WikiDeal are '''Participative Contracts''': open, transparent agreements, co-created and validated by the community, much like Wikipedia articles. They replace traditional opaque contracts, ensuring fairness and accountability in every Transaction. Community validation — voting and peer review ensures contracts evolve to meet the needs of all participants, fostering trust and shared ownership.
* '''(A) Early adopters''' — pioneers, influencers, opinion leaders who launch the platform;
* '''(B) Communities & online marketplaces''' — long-tail and Social & Solidarity Economy networks that migrate in;
* '''(C) Legal professionals''' — lawyers and jurists who formalise and adapt contracts;
* '''(D) Users at large''' — the broad public, whose '''lower final prices, more flexible services, and built-in dispute prevention''' make WikiDeal attractive. '''This last audience (D) is the principal lever for broad deployment''': if WikiDeal offers a marketplace with better prices and more flexible services than the competition bootstrapped by volunteering, as on Wikipedia, and sustained by rewards for contributors — broad adhesion becomes probable rather than merely possible.


=== Lever 2 — Credits Economy ([[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Cash-Rewards|Cash Rewards]] (no guarantee*) + [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Miles-Credits|Miles Credits]] in Rings) ===
__TOC__
 
The WikiDeal ecosystem is powered by the '''Credits Economy''', a multi-faceted digital currency designed for flexibility and community benefit. It comprises:
 
* '''Cash Rewards (no guarantee*)''' 💰 — convertible to CHF, can be cashed out to a bank account; tax applies at cash-out.
* ''Gift (indirect)'' — the difference between the bonding curve total and (Cash + Miles); not a user choice, it flows automatically. See [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Cash-Rewards|Rewards Explained]].
* '''Miles Credits''' 🔗 — usable within Rings (agreements between ≥2 [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:User Groups|User Groups]]); complementary currency with usage coefficients from 1 (restricted) to 10 (widely accepted).
* '''Ring''' — an agreement between at least 2 User Groups that enables Miles Credits interoperability.
 
This tiered system ensures liquidity, incentivizes community contributions, and supports diverse economic interactions, while promoting transparent and fair value exchange.
 
=== Lever 3 — Exit to Community (progressive transfer of governance) ===
 
WikiDeal is built on '''[[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Exit To Community|Exit to Community]]''', a progressive model for transferring governance and ownership from the founding Ynternet.org Foundation to the collective of its User Groups. As the platform grows, its direction and control increasingly reside with those who use and contribute to it — through proportional voting rights tied to participation, community-elected governance bodies, and phased decentralization of decision-making power.
 
=== Lever 4 — [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Bonding Curve|Bonding Curve]] & Funding Stabilizer (dual algorithm for funding) ===
 
Financial stability and growth are secured by a '''Bonding Curve & Funding Stabilizer''' dual algorithm. The '''Bonding Curve''' is a transparent, mathematically fixed mechanism governing the issuance of Credits and their value, rewarding early adopters and ensuring predictable funding. The '''[[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Funding Stabilizer|Funding Stabilizer]]''' is a dynamic adjustment layer that responds to the platform's financial health, automatically recalibrating the distribution of newly generated Credits between community and individual rewards. Together they provide long-term predictability and adaptive responsiveness, aligning incentives for sustainable growth and community benefit.


----
----


== 1. Lower Commissions: Decent Income Without Extreme Profit ==
= A. Early Adopters — Pioneers, Influencers & Opinion Leaders =
 
WikiDeal's commission hypothesis ranges from '''5–15%''' (vs. 10–50% for most incumbent platforms). See [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Revenue-Structure|Revenue Structure]] for the complete model.


This is '''not zero''' — those who deploy and operate services on WikiDeal must earn a '''dignified, decent income'''. The goal is not to impoverish service providers. The goal is to eliminate '''extreme profit extraction''' — the binary logic of the GAFAM and net-economy IPO culture, which operates on a winner-takes-all dynamic: a platform must either buy out or destroy competitors, or risk being destroyed itself.
This first set of levers mobilises the '''early adopters''' (pioneers, influencers, opinion leaders): the people who launch User Groups, bring their communities, and contribute both '''money and ideas''' to this participative platform. They are drawn by WikiDeal's '''free culture''' (open licence and open content) and its purpose as a '''commons'''. These levers rest on a body of [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Main|sociotechnical innovations]] combined for effect.


WikiDeal escapes this logic by design. Because the platform is a commons — governed by the [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Exit To Community|Exit to Community]] principle and structured around [[Gov/en/Portal:Ecosystem/Coopetition|co-opetition]] — it does not need to conquer. It can grow '''without being forced to buy or destroy competitors'''. Instead, the strategy is to '''unite the strength of the small''' (''unir la force des petits''): all the small players — independent service providers, cooperatives, citizen initiatives — can ally on a single commons platform and, together, outcompete the large incumbents, not through aggression, but through structural fairness.
== 1. A Commons They Co-Own: Exit to Community ==


Significant contributors earn decent, sustainable revenue. [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:User Groups|User Groups]] set their own specific-service commissions within transparent bounds. The surplus, after audited costs are covered, is returned to the community. There is no [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Revenue-Structure|profit margin]] by design.
Early adopters do not merely use WikiDeal — they progressively own and govern it. The '''Exit to Community''' lever combines progressive transfer of governance, proportional voting rights tied to participation, and community-elected bodies, so that control increasingly resides with those who use and contribute to the platform. For pioneers, this means their early energy compounds into lasting influence over the platform's direction.


----
== 2. Efficient Funding Mechanism ==


== 2. More Flexible, More Options ==
Early supporters who believe in the project receive proportionally greater rewards as it grows. This '''efficient funding mechanism''' is a conjunction of innovations — a Bonding Curve (transparent, mathematically fixed issuance of Credits) coupled with a Funding Stabilizer (dynamic recalibration of newly generated Credits between community and individual rewards). Together they give early adopters predictable, adaptive incentives, aligning personal reward with sustainable, community-beneficial growth.


WikiDeal is designed to be '''more flexible''' than existing marketplace platforms. Key dimensions:
== 3. Organic Deployment Rewarding Initiative ==


* '''Many contract models''' — employment, volunteering, bike loan, childcare, tutoring, co-housing, and many more — all freely accessible to browse, with lawyer-endorsed versions unlocked via subscription.
Markets need not be created from above — they emerge from '''citizen initiative'''. Small entrepreneurs, associations and cooperatives launching their own User Groups (babysitting networks, transport cooperatives, tool libraries, artist collectives, tutoring circles) bring both supply and demand simultaneously. This lever combines Community Migrations, Living Labs and a co-opetitive structure: rather than a cold-start marketing campaign, growth is organic, stimulating '''merit''' and '''personal initiative''' and rewarding those who invest energy in building their community's marketplace. Competition is internal, productive and governed — better service without destructive rivalry.
* '''[[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:User Groups|User Groups]]''' — autonomous local or thematic communities with their own governance, their own commission rates, and their own contract adaptations.
* '''[[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Miles-Credits|Miles Credits]]''' — a complementary currency enabling exchange of housing, transport, food, and services within [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Rings Of Trust|Rings of Trust]], giving users flexibility beyond cash transactions.
* '''[[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Call:Main|Open Calls]]''' — seasonal community invitations to propose improvements, new contract models, or entirely new marketplace types.
 
Users are not locked into a single offer. They can choose the model that fits their community, their budget, and their values.


----
----


== 3. Citizen Initiatives: Organic Market Deployment ==
= B. Communities & Online Marketplaces =


One of WikiDeal's core deployment hypotheses is that '''markets need not be created from above''' — they can emerge organically from citizen initiative. Small entrepreneurs, associations, and cooperatives launching their own User Groups (babysitting networks, local transport cooperatives, tool libraries, artist collectives, tutoring circles) bring both supply and demand simultaneously when they migrate to WikiDeal.
The second audience is made of '''existing communities and online marketplaces''' from the long tail of niche networks to the broader '''Social & Solidarity Economy (SSE)'''. These groups already have internal transaction flows and trust relationships; WikiDeal offers them a shared home that multiplies their reach without dissolving their autonomy.


This is what [[Gov/en/Portal:Ecosystem/Community-Migrations|Community Migrations]] are designed for. Existing communities — those that already have internal transaction flows and trust relationships — migrate their practices onto WikiDeal's framework. Rather than a cold-start marketing campaign, this is organic market deployment: stimulating '''merit''' and '''personal initiative''', rewarding those who invest energy in building their community's marketplace.
== 4. Community Migrations & Autonomous User Groups ==


The [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Coopetition|co-opetitive]] structure means that User Groups have more incentive to improve their own quality than to fight over external users. The competition is internal, productive, and governed — producing better service without destructive rivalry.
This lever combines [[Gov/en/Portal:Ecosystem/Community-Migrations|Community Migrations]] with autonomous [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:User Groups|User Groups]]: communities migrate their practices onto WikiDeal's framework while keeping their own governance, their own commission rates, and their own contract adaptations. SSE actors — cooperatives, associations, mutual-aid networks — find a platform whose values (commons, fairness, participation) match their own, and whose tooling lets them scale without surrendering control.


----
== 5. One Unified Platform: Rings of Trust ==
 
== 4. Users Who Need Lower Prices ==
 
For large portions of the population, a '''10–20% saving''' on everyday services is economically meaningful — not a luxury, a necessity. Transport, housing, childcare, household services: when the incumbent platform extracts 25–35% and WikiDeal charges 5–10%, the difference stays in the pocket of the service provider '''and''' reflects in the price offered to the client.
 
This creates a gravitational pull at both ends of the transaction:
 
* '''Service providers''' earn more per transaction — or can offer lower prices and still earn the same.
* '''Clients''' can access services that were previously unaffordable, or save meaningfully on regular expenditures.


Even 10% off transport or housing, at scale, matters a great deal to people of modest means. WikiDeal does not serve only affluent, tech-savvy early adopters — it is designed to be accessible and useful to anyone who buys or sells services.
Fragmentation is the enemy of small players. This lever unites them: '''all the small players ally on a single shared platform''' and, together, outcompete large incumbents — not through acquisition or aggression, but through structural fairness and network effects. Rings of Trust connect User Groups across domains (a babysitter's Miles Credits become usable for tutoring, transport, or festival services), track records follow users across contexts with consent, and contract models are shared and improved collectively. A single, well-governed commons is more powerful than many small private silos.


----
----


== 5. Trust: Built by Design, Not by Marketing ==
= C. Legal Professionals — Lawyers & Jurists =
 
Trust is WikiDeal's most fundamental structural asset. Several mechanisms work together:


=== Corrective and Compensatory Measures ===
A distinctive audience for WikiDeal is the '''legal profession'''. Lawyers and jurists are not bystanders here — they have an active, remunerated role that turns legal expertise into a growth lever.
The platform includes built-in corrective measures (dispute resolution via [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Arbitration Chambers|Arbitration Chambers]]) and compensatory options (redress mechanisms within contracts) that give users confidence that problems can be resolved fairly, without resorting to external legal systems.


=== Fluid, Fair Contracts ===
== 6. Legal Facilitation: Coaching, Contracts & Arbitration ==
Contracts on WikiDeal are [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Collaborative Contract Editing|wiki-edited, versioned, and community-validated]] — like Wikipedia articles, but for legal agreements. They evolve as the community's understanding improves. Volunteer lawyers endorse them and take named, accountable responsibility ([[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Peer Endorsement|Peer Endorsement]]). This combination of transparency, fluidity, and accountability is rare in the marketplace economy.


=== 1 User = 1 Vote ===
This lever combines collaborative contract editing, peer endorsement, and arbitration into a professional opportunity for jurists:
Governance is participatory: '''1 user = 1 vote'''. Users who contribute to the platform are not just consumers — they are stakeholders with genuine decision-making power. This structure gives users reason to trust that the platform will not be redirected against their interests by a small shareholder group.


=== Track Records and Decentralized Data ===
* '''Coaching & contract formalisation''' — lawyers help formalise and adapt [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Collaborative Contract Editing|wiki-edited, versioned, community-validated contract models]] to specific needs, generating '''income''' for them.
WikiDeal integrates the ability to consult — or to require, in more complex transactions — the '''track record''' of the other party: past transactions, satisfaction ratings, community activity records. Crucially, this data is shared '''only if the parties agree''': decentralized, consent-based data sharing. Both parties can flexibly require or waive the other's track record history, depending on the stakes of the transaction. This mechanism, operating within [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Rings Of Trust|Rings of Trust]], allows trust to be built gradually and contextually without requiring a centralised surveillance architecture.
* '''Prevention over cure''' — by building clear, fair contracts up front, jurists help '''prevent conflicts rather than litigate them''', a more sustainable and reputation-building practice.
* '''Peer endorsement''' — volunteer lawyers endorse models and take named, accountable responsibility ([[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Peer Endorsement|Peer Endorsement]]), making contracts legally credible across jurisdictions.
* '''Arbitration''' jurists can participate in dispute resolution via [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Arbitration Chambers|Arbitration Chambers]].


=== Interests and Community Signals ===
A growing library of '''ready-to-use contract models in free access''' (employment, volunteering, bike loan, childcare, tutoring, co-housing, and more) is browsable by anyone; lawyer-endorsed versions add legal credibility. For jurists, WikiDeal is a new field of practice that aligns income with conflict prevention.
Trust also emerges from shared context: seeing the other party's declared interests, the User Groups they belong to, their volunteering history, or their use of [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Miles-Credits|Miles Credits]] for community exchange. These signals provide a richer, more human picture than a simple star rating.


----
----


== 6. Subscription Mandatory Only on Transactions: Browse Freely ==
= D. Users at Large — The Principal Lever for Broad Deployment =


A common concern about platform subscriptions is that they create a barrier to entry. WikiDeal addresses this directly:
The broadest audience — and, as stated in the introduction, '''the principal lever for large-scale deployment''' — is the general public who buy and sell services. For them, three advantages combine: '''lower final prices''', '''more flexible services''', and '''built-in help to prevent and resolve disputes'''.


* '''Free access:''' Anyone can browse WikiDeal — read contract models, explore User Groups, consult governance documentation — without any subscription.
== 7. Fair Commission Fees & Attractive Pricing ==
* '''Subscription is triggered only at transaction time:''' The [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Subscription|CHF 1/month subscription]] (CHF 10/year) becomes due only when a user signs a contract. If a user browses for months and never transacts, they never pay.
* '''Retroactive billing:''' Overdue subscription months are settled at the time of the next contract signing — no surprise charges between transactions.


What does the subscription unlock? '''Added value''':
What matters most for broad adhesion is '''attractive pricing''' — a marketplace with better prices than the competition.


* '''Smartphone apps''' for mobile access to the full platform.
WikiDeal's commission hypothesis ranges from '''5–15%''' (vs. 10–50% for most incumbent platforms; see [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Revenue-Structure|Revenue Structure]]). This is '''not zero''' — those who deploy and operate services must earn a '''dignified, decent income'''. The goal is not to impoverish service providers, but to eliminate '''extreme profit extraction''' — the winner-takes-all logic of GAFAM and net-economy IPO culture.
* '''Lawyer-endorsed contracts''' — the [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Peer Endorsement|Peer Endorsement]] layer that makes contracts legally credible and fair.
* Access to the full library of '''ready-to-use contract models''': employment agreements, volunteering contracts, bike-loan agreements, childcare arrangements, and many more.
* Full access to dispute resolution mechanisms.


The subscription is not a paywall — it is a membership in a community-governed commons. The value returned exceeds the cost, especially for regular users.
WikiDeal escapes this logic by design. As a commons — governed by [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Exit To Community|Exit to Community]] and structured around [[Gov/en/Portal:Ecosystem/Coopetition|co-opetition]] — it does not need to conquer. It can grow '''without buying or destroying competitors''', uniting '''the strength of the small''' (''unir la force des petits'') against the large incumbents through structural fairness.


----
For large portions of the population, a '''10–20% saving''' on everyday services is meaningful — not a luxury, a necessity. When the incumbent extracts 25–35% and WikiDeal charges 5–10%, the difference stays with the service provider '''and''' lowers the price for the client:


== 7. Everything United in One Platform ==
* '''Service providers''' earn more per transaction or can offer lower prices and still earn the same.
 
* '''Clients''' access services previously unaffordable, or save meaningfully on regular expenditures.
One of the [[Gov/en/Portal:Onboarding/Glossary:Founding Question|founding question]]'s key insights is captured in the word "'''A'''" there should be a single platform, not many fragmented ones. The argument: '''all the small players ally on a single shared platform''' and, together, outcompete the large incumbents — not through acquisition or aggression, but through structural fairness and network effects.


This unity produces practical advantages:
Bootstrapped by '''volunteering''' (as on Wikipedia) and sustained by '''rewards for contributors''', attractive pricing and fair, lower commission fees are what make broad adhesion probable.


* '''[[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Rings Of Trust|Rings of Trust]]''' connect User Groups across domains — a babysitter's Miles Credits become usable for tutoring, transport, or festival services as the Rings expand.
== 8. More Flexible Services ==
* '''Track records follow users across contexts''' — not siloed by domain, but portable across the platform with user consent.
* '''Contract models are shared and improved collectively''' — a legal innovation adopted in one User Group can propagate across the whole ecosystem.
* '''Governance decisions affect the whole platform''' — improvements in arbitration, pricing, or fraud prevention benefit everyone simultaneously.


The alternative — many small competing platforms — produces fragmentation, duplicated costs, and race-to-the-bottom dynamics. WikiDeal's hypothesis is that a single, well-governed commons is more powerful than many small private silos.
WikiDeal is designed to be '''more flexible''' than existing marketplaces. This lever combines several innovations into everyday flexibility:


----
* '''Many contract models''' — employment, volunteering, bike loan, childcare, tutoring, co-housing, and more — freely browsable, with lawyer-endorsed versions unlocked via subscription.
* '''[[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:User Groups|User Groups]]''' — autonomous local or thematic communities with their own governance and adaptations.
* '''[[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Miles-Credits|Miles Credits]]''' — a complementary currency for exchanging housing, transport, food and services within [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Rings Of Trust|Rings of Trust]], beyond cash.
* '''[[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Call:Main|Open Calls]]''' — seasonal invitations to propose improvements, new contract models, or new marketplace types.


== 8. A Deployment Strategy That Grows Without Conquest ==
Users are not locked into a single offer — they choose the model that fits their community, budget and values. A '''low subscription barrier''' reinforces this: anyone can browse freely; the [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Subscription|CHF 1/month subscription]] (CHF 10/year) is due only when a contract is signed, never for browsing.


The deployment strategy is progressive and non-aggressive:
== 9. Dispute Prevention & Trust by Design ==


# '''Living Labs first:''' [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:User Groups|User Groups]] launch as Living Labs — small-scale, real-world experiments in specific domains (babysitting, tutoring, tool libraries, etc.).
For users at large, confidence comes from '''help to prevent and resolve disputes''', not from marketing. This lever combines several trust mechanisms:
# '''Community Migrations:''' Existing cooperatives and associations migrate to WikiDeal, bringing their users and transaction flows.
# '''Rings of Trust expand:''' As more User Groups join, Miles Credits become more widely usable, increasing the network's value.
# '''Open Calls drive innovation:''' The community proposes, debates, and adopts improvements through seasonal [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Call:Main|Open Calls]].
# '''Early Supporters fund the foundation:''' The [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Bonding Curve|Bonding Curve]] and [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Why-Fund-WikiDeal|funding model]] ensure that those who believe in the project early receive proportionally greater rewards as it grows.
# '''Volunteer lawyers expand legal coverage:''' As the community grows, more endorsed contract models become available in more jurisdictions, reducing friction for international transactions.


At no stage does WikiDeal need to acquire a competitor, launch an aggressive advertising campaign, or exploit its user base to grow. The growth is structural: each new User Group, Ring of Trust, and endorsed contract adds value to the whole ecosystem.
* '''Corrective & compensatory measures''' — dispute resolution via [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Arbitration Chambers|Arbitration Chambers]] and redress options within contracts, resolving problems fairly without external legal systems.
* '''Participative Contracts''' — open, community-validated agreements (like Wikipedia articles) replace opaque ones, making expectations clear up front and preventing conflict.
* '''1 user = 1 vote''' — participatory governance gives users genuine decision-making power, so the platform cannot be redirected against their interests.
* '''Track records & decentralized, consent-based data''' — parties can consult or require the other's track record, shared only by mutual agreement within [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Rings Of Trust|Rings of Trust]], building trust gradually without centralised surveillance.
* '''Community signals''' — declared interests, User Group membership, volunteering history and Miles Credits use give a richer, more human picture than a star rating.


----
----
Line 163: Line 118:
{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
|-
|-
! Reason !! Mechanism !! Key pages
! Audience !! Lever !! Key pages
|-
| A. Early adopters || Commons they co-own (Exit to Community) || [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Exit To Community|Exit to Community]]
|-
|-
| Lower commissions || 5–15% vs. 10–50% market, at-cost design || [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Revenue-Structure|Revenue Structure]]
| A. Early adopters || Efficient Funding Mechanism || [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Bonding Curve|Bonding Curve]]
|-
|-
| Flexible options || User Groups, Miles, Open Calls, contract library || [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Main|Innovations Index]]
| A. Early adopters || Organic deployment rewarding initiative || [[Gov/en/Portal:Ecosystem/Community-Migrations|Community Migrations]]
|-
|-
| Citizen organic deployment || Community Migrations, Living Labs || [[Gov/en/Portal:Ecosystem/Community-Migrations|Community Migrations]]
| B. Communities & marketplaces || Community Migrations & autonomous User Groups || [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:User Groups|User Groups]]
|-
|-
| Meaningful savings for users || 10–20% less on everyday services || [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Why-Fund-WikiDeal|Why Fund WikiDeal]]
| B. Communities & marketplaces || One unified platform (Rings of Trust) || [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Rings Of Trust|Rings of Trust]]
|-
|-
| Trust by design || Arbitration, Peer Endorsement, track records, 1 user = 1 vote || [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Arbitration Chambers|Arbitration Chambers]]
| C. Legal professionals || Legal facilitation: coaching, contracts, arbitration || [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Peer Endorsement|Peer Endorsement]]
|-
|-
| Low subscription barrier || Mandatory only on transaction; browse freely || [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Subscription|Subscription Model]]
| D. Users at large || Fair commission fees & attractive pricing || [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Revenue-Structure|Revenue Structure]]
|-
|-
| One unified platform || Rings of Trust, portable track records, shared governance || [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Rings Of Trust|Rings of Trust]]
| D. Users at large || More flexible services || [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Main|Innovations Index]]
|-
|-
| Non-aggressive growth || Living Labs → Migrations → Rings → Open Calls → Scale || [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Research:Main|Research Main]]
| D. Users at large || Dispute prevention & trust by design || [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Arbitration Chambers|Arbitration Chambers]]
|}
|}



Latest revision as of 16:44, 15 June 2026

💡 In simple words: This page explains why and how WikiDeal can grow and work for many people around the world. It talks about fair prices, trust, and how everyone can join together to make one big shared marketplace.


⚠️ Not yet approved. This page describes a proposal that is still under community review. It is documented here so it can be discussed, improved and endorsed.


Why and How WikiDeal Can Work: Deployment Strategy & Shared Vision

From WikiDeal, the Wikipedia of e-commerce — R&D Research Portal

This page presents the reasons we believe there is strong growth potential for WikiDeal. It complements the founding research hypothesis — "Can users own, run and sustain a global marketplace?" — with a concrete shared vision and deployment strategy rolled out progressively, through organic market expansion.

These are not promises. WikiDeal is a proof of concept and a citizen science project. But there are substantive reasons to believe the model can achieve broad adhesion. They are laid out here as success levers — the possible sources and drivers of success.

Each lever is a conjunction of several sociotechnical innovations working together. This page does not describe the innovations themselves (see the Innovations Index for that); it describes the competitive advantages that emerge when those innovations combine. The levers are open and expected to evolve over time; these are the initial proposed levers, all subject to community review via the Open Call process.

The levers are presented by audience, in order of appearance — the publics that join WikiDeal one after another as it grows:

  • (A) Early adopters — pioneers, influencers, opinion leaders who launch the platform;
  • (B) Communities & online marketplaces — long-tail and Social & Solidarity Economy networks that migrate in;
  • (C) Legal professionals — lawyers and jurists who formalise and adapt contracts;
  • (D) Users at large — the broad public, whose lower final prices, more flexible services, and built-in dispute prevention make WikiDeal attractive. This last audience (D) is the principal lever for broad deployment: if WikiDeal offers a marketplace with better prices and more flexible services than the competition — bootstrapped by volunteering, as on Wikipedia, and sustained by rewards for contributors — broad adhesion becomes probable rather than merely possible.

A. Early Adopters — Pioneers, Influencers & Opinion Leaders

This first set of levers mobilises the early adopters (pioneers, influencers, opinion leaders): the people who launch User Groups, bring their communities, and contribute both money and ideas to this participative platform. They are drawn by WikiDeal's free culture (open licence and open content) and its purpose as a commons. These levers rest on a body of sociotechnical innovations combined for effect.

1. A Commons They Co-Own: Exit to Community

Early adopters do not merely use WikiDeal — they progressively own and govern it. The Exit to Community lever combines progressive transfer of governance, proportional voting rights tied to participation, and community-elected bodies, so that control increasingly resides with those who use and contribute to the platform. For pioneers, this means their early energy compounds into lasting influence over the platform's direction.

2. Efficient Funding Mechanism

Early supporters who believe in the project receive proportionally greater rewards as it grows. This efficient funding mechanism is a conjunction of innovations — a Bonding Curve (transparent, mathematically fixed issuance of Credits) coupled with a Funding Stabilizer (dynamic recalibration of newly generated Credits between community and individual rewards). Together they give early adopters predictable, adaptive incentives, aligning personal reward with sustainable, community-beneficial growth.

3. Organic Deployment Rewarding Initiative

Markets need not be created from above — they emerge from citizen initiative. Small entrepreneurs, associations and cooperatives launching their own User Groups (babysitting networks, transport cooperatives, tool libraries, artist collectives, tutoring circles) bring both supply and demand simultaneously. This lever combines Community Migrations, Living Labs and a co-opetitive structure: rather than a cold-start marketing campaign, growth is organic, stimulating merit and personal initiative and rewarding those who invest energy in building their community's marketplace. Competition is internal, productive and governed — better service without destructive rivalry.


B. Communities & Online Marketplaces

The second audience is made of existing communities and online marketplaces — from the long tail of niche networks to the broader Social & Solidarity Economy (SSE). These groups already have internal transaction flows and trust relationships; WikiDeal offers them a shared home that multiplies their reach without dissolving their autonomy.

4. Community Migrations & Autonomous User Groups

This lever combines Community Migrations with autonomous User Groups: communities migrate their practices onto WikiDeal's framework while keeping their own governance, their own commission rates, and their own contract adaptations. SSE actors — cooperatives, associations, mutual-aid networks — find a platform whose values (commons, fairness, participation) match their own, and whose tooling lets them scale without surrendering control.

5. One Unified Platform: Rings of Trust

Fragmentation is the enemy of small players. This lever unites them: all the small players ally on a single shared platform and, together, outcompete large incumbents — not through acquisition or aggression, but through structural fairness and network effects. Rings of Trust connect User Groups across domains (a babysitter's Miles Credits become usable for tutoring, transport, or festival services), track records follow users across contexts with consent, and contract models are shared and improved collectively. A single, well-governed commons is more powerful than many small private silos.


C. Legal Professionals — Lawyers & Jurists

A distinctive audience for WikiDeal is the legal profession. Lawyers and jurists are not bystanders here — they have an active, remunerated role that turns legal expertise into a growth lever.

6. Legal Facilitation: Coaching, Contracts & Arbitration

This lever combines collaborative contract editing, peer endorsement, and arbitration into a professional opportunity for jurists:

  • Coaching & contract formalisation — lawyers help formalise and adapt wiki-edited, versioned, community-validated contract models to specific needs, generating income for them.
  • Prevention over cure — by building clear, fair contracts up front, jurists help prevent conflicts rather than litigate them, a more sustainable and reputation-building practice.
  • Peer endorsement — volunteer lawyers endorse models and take named, accountable responsibility (Peer Endorsement), making contracts legally credible across jurisdictions.
  • Arbitration — jurists can participate in dispute resolution via Arbitration Chambers.

A growing library of ready-to-use contract models in free access (employment, volunteering, bike loan, childcare, tutoring, co-housing, and more) is browsable by anyone; lawyer-endorsed versions add legal credibility. For jurists, WikiDeal is a new field of practice that aligns income with conflict prevention.


D. Users at Large — The Principal Lever for Broad Deployment

The broadest audience — and, as stated in the introduction, the principal lever for large-scale deployment — is the general public who buy and sell services. For them, three advantages combine: lower final prices, more flexible services, and built-in help to prevent and resolve disputes.

7. Fair Commission Fees & Attractive Pricing

What matters most for broad adhesion is attractive pricing — a marketplace with better prices than the competition.

WikiDeal's commission hypothesis ranges from 5–15% (vs. 10–50% for most incumbent platforms; see Revenue Structure). This is not zero — those who deploy and operate services must earn a dignified, decent income. The goal is not to impoverish service providers, but to eliminate extreme profit extraction — the winner-takes-all logic of GAFAM and net-economy IPO culture.

WikiDeal escapes this logic by design. As a commons — governed by Exit to Community and structured around co-opetition — it does not need to conquer. It can grow without buying or destroying competitors, uniting the strength of the small (unir la force des petits) against the large incumbents through structural fairness.

For large portions of the population, a 10–20% saving on everyday services is meaningful — not a luxury, a necessity. When the incumbent extracts 25–35% and WikiDeal charges 5–10%, the difference stays with the service provider and lowers the price for the client:

  • Service providers earn more per transaction — or can offer lower prices and still earn the same.
  • Clients access services previously unaffordable, or save meaningfully on regular expenditures.

Bootstrapped by volunteering (as on Wikipedia) and sustained by rewards for contributors, attractive pricing and fair, lower commission fees are what make broad adhesion probable.

8. More Flexible Services

WikiDeal is designed to be more flexible than existing marketplaces. This lever combines several innovations into everyday flexibility:

  • Many contract models — employment, volunteering, bike loan, childcare, tutoring, co-housing, and more — freely browsable, with lawyer-endorsed versions unlocked via subscription.
  • User Groups — autonomous local or thematic communities with their own governance and adaptations.
  • Miles Credits — a complementary currency for exchanging housing, transport, food and services within Rings of Trust, beyond cash.
  • Open Calls — seasonal invitations to propose improvements, new contract models, or new marketplace types.

Users are not locked into a single offer — they choose the model that fits their community, budget and values. A low subscription barrier reinforces this: anyone can browse freely; the CHF 1/month subscription (CHF 10/year) is due only when a contract is signed, never for browsing.

9. Dispute Prevention & Trust by Design

For users at large, confidence comes from help to prevent and resolve disputes, not from marketing. This lever combines several trust mechanisms:

  • Corrective & compensatory measures — dispute resolution via Arbitration Chambers and redress options within contracts, resolving problems fairly without external legal systems.
  • Participative Contracts — open, community-validated agreements (like Wikipedia articles) replace opaque ones, making expectations clear up front and preventing conflict.
  • 1 user = 1 vote — participatory governance gives users genuine decision-making power, so the platform cannot be redirected against their interests.
  • Track records & decentralized, consent-based data — parties can consult or require the other's track record, shared only by mutual agreement within Rings of Trust, building trust gradually without centralised surveillance.
  • Community signals — declared interests, User Group membership, volunteering history and Miles Credits use give a richer, more human picture than a star rating.

Summary: The Shared Vision

Audience Lever Key pages
A. Early adopters Commons they co-own (Exit to Community) Exit to Community
A. Early adopters Efficient Funding Mechanism Bonding Curve
A. Early adopters Organic deployment rewarding initiative Community Migrations
B. Communities & marketplaces Community Migrations & autonomous User Groups User Groups
B. Communities & marketplaces One unified platform (Rings of Trust) Rings of Trust
C. Legal professionals Legal facilitation: coaching, contracts, arbitration Peer Endorsement
D. Users at large Fair commission fees & attractive pricing Revenue Structure
D. Users at large More flexible services Innovations Index
D. Users at large Dispute prevention & trust by design Arbitration Chambers

WikiDeal is not a promise of success. It is a structured hypothesis, pursued as citizen science, with a deployment strategy designed to make broad adhesion probable rather than merely possible. These are the reasons we believe there is strong growth potential.


See Also