Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Research:Why-And-How-It-Can-Work: Difference between revisions
Fix: replace 'community contributions' with 'community activity records' to avoid forbidden term ambiguity |
Restructure by audience (A early adopters / B communities & SSE marketplaces / C legal professionals / D users at large = principal lever); levers as conjunctions of innovations (not innovation listings); add legal facilitation; fair commission fees & attractive pricing; efficient funding mechanism; TOC |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{KidsIntro|This page explains why | {{KidsIntro|This page explains why and how WikiDeal can grow and work for many people around the world. It talks about fair prices, trust, and how everyone can join together to make one big shared marketplace.}} | ||
{{NotApproved}} | {{NotApproved}} | ||
= Why WikiDeal | = Why and How WikiDeal Can Work: Deployment Strategy & Shared Vision = | ||
''From WikiDeal, the Wikipedia of e-commerce — [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Research:Main|R&D Research Portal]]'' | ''From WikiDeal, the Wikipedia of e-commerce — [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Research:Main|R&D Research Portal]]'' | ||
This page presents the reasons we believe there is strong growth potential for WikiDeal. It complements the [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Research:Main|founding research hypothesis]] — "[[Gov/en/Portal:Onboarding/Glossary:Founding Question|Can users own, run and sustain a global marketplace?]]" — with a concrete '''shared vision''' and '''deployment strategy''' rolled out progressively, through organic market expansion. | This page presents the reasons we believe there is strong growth potential for WikiDeal. It complements the [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Research:Main|founding research hypothesis]] — "[[Gov/en/Portal:Onboarding/Glossary:Founding Question|Can users own, run and sustain a global marketplace?]]" — with a concrete '''shared vision''' and '''deployment strategy''' rolled out progressively, through organic market expansion. | ||
These are not promises. WikiDeal is a [[Gov/en/Portal:Onboarding/Glossary:Founding Question|proof of concept]] and a citizen science project. But there are substantive reasons to believe the model can achieve broad adhesion. They are laid out here. | These are not promises. WikiDeal is a [[Gov/en/Portal:Onboarding/Glossary:Founding Question|proof of concept]] and a citizen science project. But there are substantive reasons to believe the model can achieve broad adhesion. They are laid out here as '''success levers''' — the possible sources and drivers of success. | ||
Each lever is a '''conjunction of several [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Main|sociotechnical innovations]]''' working together. This page does '''not''' describe the innovations themselves (see the [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Main|Innovations Index]] for that); it describes the '''competitive advantages''' that emerge when those innovations combine. The levers are open and expected to evolve over time; these are the initial proposed levers, all subject to community review via the [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Call:Main|Open Call]] process. | |||
The levers are presented '''by audience, in order of appearance''' — the publics that join WikiDeal one after another as it grows: | |||
* '''(A) Early adopters''' — pioneers, influencers, opinion leaders who launch the platform; | |||
* '''(B) Communities & online marketplaces''' — long-tail and Social & Solidarity Economy networks that migrate in; | |||
* '''(C) Legal professionals''' — lawyers and jurists who formalise and adapt contracts; | |||
* '''(D) Users at large''' — the broad public, whose '''lower final prices, more flexible services, and built-in dispute prevention''' make WikiDeal attractive. '''This last audience (D) is the principal lever for broad deployment''': if WikiDeal offers a marketplace with better prices and more flexible services than the competition — bootstrapped by volunteering, as on Wikipedia, and sustained by rewards for contributors — broad adhesion becomes probable rather than merely possible. | |||
__TOC__ | |||
---- | ---- | ||
= | = A. Early Adopters — Pioneers, Influencers & Opinion Leaders = | ||
WikiDeal | This first set of levers mobilises the '''early adopters''' (pioneers, influencers, opinion leaders): the people who launch User Groups, bring their communities, and contribute both '''money and ideas''' to this participative platform. They are drawn by WikiDeal's '''free culture''' (open licence and open content) and its purpose as a '''commons'''. These levers rest on a body of [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Main|sociotechnical innovations]] combined for effect. | ||
== 1. A Commons They Co-Own: Exit to Community == | |||
Early adopters do not merely use WikiDeal — they progressively own and govern it. The '''Exit to Community''' lever combines progressive transfer of governance, proportional voting rights tied to participation, and community-elected bodies, so that control increasingly resides with those who use and contribute to the platform. For pioneers, this means their early energy compounds into lasting influence over the platform's direction. | |||
== 2. Efficient Funding Mechanism == | |||
Early supporters who believe in the project receive proportionally greater rewards as it grows. This '''efficient funding mechanism''' is a conjunction of innovations — a Bonding Curve (transparent, mathematically fixed issuance of Credits) coupled with a Funding Stabilizer (dynamic recalibration of newly generated Credits between community and individual rewards). Together they give early adopters predictable, adaptive incentives, aligning personal reward with sustainable, community-beneficial growth. | |||
== 3. Organic Deployment Rewarding Initiative == | |||
This | Markets need not be created from above — they emerge from '''citizen initiative'''. Small entrepreneurs, associations and cooperatives launching their own User Groups (babysitting networks, transport cooperatives, tool libraries, artist collectives, tutoring circles) bring both supply and demand simultaneously. This lever combines Community Migrations, Living Labs and a co-opetitive structure: rather than a cold-start marketing campaign, growth is organic, stimulating '''merit''' and '''personal initiative''' and rewarding those who invest energy in building their community's marketplace. Competition is internal, productive and governed — better service without destructive rivalry. | ||
---- | |||
= B. Communities & Online Marketplaces = | |||
The second audience is made of '''existing communities and online marketplaces''' — from the long tail of niche networks to the broader '''Social & Solidarity Economy (SSE)'''. These groups already have internal transaction flows and trust relationships; WikiDeal offers them a shared home that multiplies their reach without dissolving their autonomy. | |||
== 4. Community Migrations & Autonomous User Groups == | |||
This | This lever combines [[Gov/en/Portal:Ecosystem/Community-Migrations|Community Migrations]] with autonomous [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:User Groups|User Groups]]: communities migrate their practices onto WikiDeal's framework while keeping their own governance, their own commission rates, and their own contract adaptations. SSE actors — cooperatives, associations, mutual-aid networks — find a platform whose values (commons, fairness, participation) match their own, and whose tooling lets them scale without surrendering control. | ||
== 5. One Unified Platform: Rings of Trust == | |||
Fragmentation is the enemy of small players. This lever unites them: '''all the small players ally on a single shared platform''' and, together, outcompete large incumbents — not through acquisition or aggression, but through structural fairness and network effects. Rings of Trust connect User Groups across domains (a babysitter's Miles Credits become usable for tutoring, transport, or festival services), track records follow users across contexts with consent, and contract models are shared and improved collectively. A single, well-governed commons is more powerful than many small private silos. | |||
---- | ---- | ||
= | = C. Legal Professionals — Lawyers & Jurists = | ||
A distinctive audience for WikiDeal is the '''legal profession'''. Lawyers and jurists are not bystanders here — they have an active, remunerated role that turns legal expertise into a growth lever. | |||
== | == 6. Legal Facilitation: Coaching, Contracts & Arbitration == | ||
This lever combines collaborative contract editing, peer endorsement, and arbitration into a professional opportunity for jurists: | |||
* '''Coaching & contract formalisation''' — lawyers help formalise and adapt [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Collaborative Contract Editing|wiki-edited, versioned, community-validated contract models]] to specific needs, generating '''income''' for them. | |||
* '''Prevention over cure''' — by building clear, fair contracts up front, jurists help '''prevent conflicts rather than litigate them''', a more sustainable and reputation-building practice. | |||
* '''Peer endorsement''' — volunteer lawyers endorse models and take named, accountable responsibility ([[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Peer Endorsement|Peer Endorsement]]), making contracts legally credible across jurisdictions. | |||
* '''Arbitration''' — jurists can participate in dispute resolution via [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Arbitration Chambers|Arbitration Chambers]]. | |||
A growing library of '''ready-to-use contract models in free access''' (employment, volunteering, bike loan, childcare, tutoring, co-housing, and more) is browsable by anyone; lawyer-endorsed versions add legal credibility. For jurists, WikiDeal is a new field of practice that aligns income with conflict prevention. | |||
---- | ---- | ||
= | = D. Users at Large — The Principal Lever for Broad Deployment = | ||
The broadest audience — and, as stated in the introduction, '''the principal lever for large-scale deployment''' — is the general public who buy and sell services. For them, three advantages combine: '''lower final prices''', '''more flexible services''', and '''built-in help to prevent and resolve disputes'''. | |||
== 7. Fair Commission Fees & Attractive Pricing == | |||
What | What matters most for broad adhesion is '''attractive pricing''' — a marketplace with better prices than the competition. | ||
WikiDeal's commission hypothesis ranges from '''5–15%''' (vs. 10–50% for most incumbent platforms; see [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Revenue-Structure|Revenue Structure]]). This is '''not zero''' — those who deploy and operate services must earn a '''dignified, decent income'''. The goal is not to impoverish service providers, but to eliminate '''extreme profit extraction''' — the winner-takes-all logic of GAFAM and net-economy IPO culture. | |||
WikiDeal escapes this logic by design. As a commons — governed by [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Exit To Community|Exit to Community]] and structured around [[Gov/en/Portal:Ecosystem/Coopetition|co-opetition]] — it does not need to conquer. It can grow '''without buying or destroying competitors''', uniting '''the strength of the small''' (''unir la force des petits'') against the large incumbents through structural fairness. | |||
For large portions of the population, a '''10–20% saving''' on everyday services is meaningful — not a luxury, a necessity. When the incumbent extracts 25–35% and WikiDeal charges 5–10%, the difference stays with the service provider '''and''' lowers the price for the client: | |||
* '''Service providers''' earn more per transaction — or can offer lower prices and still earn the same. | |||
* '''Clients''' access services previously unaffordable, or save meaningfully on regular expenditures. | |||
Bootstrapped by '''volunteering''' (as on Wikipedia) and sustained by '''rewards for contributors''', attractive pricing and fair, lower commission fees are what make broad adhesion probable. | |||
== 8. More Flexible Services == | |||
WikiDeal is designed to be '''more flexible''' than existing marketplaces. This lever combines several innovations into everyday flexibility: | |||
---- | * '''Many contract models''' — employment, volunteering, bike loan, childcare, tutoring, co-housing, and more — freely browsable, with lawyer-endorsed versions unlocked via subscription. | ||
* '''[[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:User Groups|User Groups]]''' — autonomous local or thematic communities with their own governance and adaptations. | |||
* '''[[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Miles-Credits|Miles Credits]]''' — a complementary currency for exchanging housing, transport, food and services within [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Rings Of Trust|Rings of Trust]], beyond cash. | |||
* '''[[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Call:Main|Open Calls]]''' — seasonal invitations to propose improvements, new contract models, or new marketplace types. | |||
Users are not locked into a single offer — they choose the model that fits their community, budget and values. A '''low subscription barrier''' reinforces this: anyone can browse freely; the [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Subscription|CHF 1/month subscription]] (CHF 10/year) is due only when a contract is signed, never for browsing. | |||
== 9. Dispute Prevention & Trust by Design == | |||
For users at large, confidence comes from '''help to prevent and resolve disputes''', not from marketing. This lever combines several trust mechanisms: | |||
* '''Corrective & compensatory measures''' — dispute resolution via [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Arbitration Chambers|Arbitration Chambers]] and redress options within contracts, resolving problems fairly without external legal systems. | |||
* '''Participative Contracts''' — open, community-validated agreements (like Wikipedia articles) replace opaque ones, making expectations clear up front and preventing conflict. | |||
* '''1 user = 1 vote''' — participatory governance gives users genuine decision-making power, so the platform cannot be redirected against their interests. | |||
* '''Track records & decentralized, consent-based data''' — parties can consult or require the other's track record, shared only by mutual agreement within [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Rings Of Trust|Rings of Trust]], building trust gradually without centralised surveillance. | |||
* '''Community signals''' — declared interests, User Group membership, volunteering history and Miles Credits use give a richer, more human picture than a star rating. | |||
---- | ---- | ||
| Line 134: | Line 118: | ||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
|- | |- | ||
! | ! Audience !! Lever !! Key pages | ||
|- | |||
| A. Early adopters || Commons they co-own (Exit to Community) || [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Exit To Community|Exit to Community]] | |||
|- | |- | ||
| | | A. Early adopters || Efficient Funding Mechanism || [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Bonding Curve|Bonding Curve]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | A. Early adopters || Organic deployment rewarding initiative || [[Gov/en/Portal:Ecosystem/Community-Migrations|Community Migrations]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | B. Communities & marketplaces || Community Migrations & autonomous User Groups || [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:User Groups|User Groups]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | B. Communities & marketplaces || One unified platform (Rings of Trust) || [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Rings Of Trust|Rings of Trust]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | C. Legal professionals || Legal facilitation: coaching, contracts, arbitration || [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Peer Endorsement|Peer Endorsement]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | D. Users at large || Fair commission fees & attractive pricing || [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Revenue-Structure|Revenue Structure]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | D. Users at large || More flexible services || [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Main|Innovations Index]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | D. Users at large || Dispute prevention & trust by design || [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Arbitration Chambers|Arbitration Chambers]] | ||
|} | |} | ||
Latest revision as of 16:44, 15 June 2026
💡 In simple words: This page explains why and how WikiDeal can grow and work for many people around the world. It talks about fair prices, trust, and how everyone can join together to make one big shared marketplace.
⚠️ Not yet approved. This page describes a proposal that is still under community review. It is documented here so it can be discussed, improved and endorsed.
From WikiDeal, the Wikipedia of e-commerce — R&D Research Portal
This page presents the reasons we believe there is strong growth potential for WikiDeal. It complements the founding research hypothesis — "Can users own, run and sustain a global marketplace?" — with a concrete shared vision and deployment strategy rolled out progressively, through organic market expansion.
These are not promises. WikiDeal is a proof of concept and a citizen science project. But there are substantive reasons to believe the model can achieve broad adhesion. They are laid out here as success levers — the possible sources and drivers of success.
Each lever is a conjunction of several sociotechnical innovations working together. This page does not describe the innovations themselves (see the Innovations Index for that); it describes the competitive advantages that emerge when those innovations combine. The levers are open and expected to evolve over time; these are the initial proposed levers, all subject to community review via the Open Call process.
The levers are presented by audience, in order of appearance — the publics that join WikiDeal one after another as it grows:
- (A) Early adopters — pioneers, influencers, opinion leaders who launch the platform;
- (B) Communities & online marketplaces — long-tail and Social & Solidarity Economy networks that migrate in;
- (C) Legal professionals — lawyers and jurists who formalise and adapt contracts;
- (D) Users at large — the broad public, whose lower final prices, more flexible services, and built-in dispute prevention make WikiDeal attractive. This last audience (D) is the principal lever for broad deployment: if WikiDeal offers a marketplace with better prices and more flexible services than the competition — bootstrapped by volunteering, as on Wikipedia, and sustained by rewards for contributors — broad adhesion becomes probable rather than merely possible.
A. Early Adopters — Pioneers, Influencers & Opinion Leaders
This first set of levers mobilises the early adopters (pioneers, influencers, opinion leaders): the people who launch User Groups, bring their communities, and contribute both money and ideas to this participative platform. They are drawn by WikiDeal's free culture (open licence and open content) and its purpose as a commons. These levers rest on a body of sociotechnical innovations combined for effect.
1. A Commons They Co-Own: Exit to Community
Early adopters do not merely use WikiDeal — they progressively own and govern it. The Exit to Community lever combines progressive transfer of governance, proportional voting rights tied to participation, and community-elected bodies, so that control increasingly resides with those who use and contribute to the platform. For pioneers, this means their early energy compounds into lasting influence over the platform's direction.
2. Efficient Funding Mechanism
Early supporters who believe in the project receive proportionally greater rewards as it grows. This efficient funding mechanism is a conjunction of innovations — a Bonding Curve (transparent, mathematically fixed issuance of Credits) coupled with a Funding Stabilizer (dynamic recalibration of newly generated Credits between community and individual rewards). Together they give early adopters predictable, adaptive incentives, aligning personal reward with sustainable, community-beneficial growth.
3. Organic Deployment Rewarding Initiative
Markets need not be created from above — they emerge from citizen initiative. Small entrepreneurs, associations and cooperatives launching their own User Groups (babysitting networks, transport cooperatives, tool libraries, artist collectives, tutoring circles) bring both supply and demand simultaneously. This lever combines Community Migrations, Living Labs and a co-opetitive structure: rather than a cold-start marketing campaign, growth is organic, stimulating merit and personal initiative and rewarding those who invest energy in building their community's marketplace. Competition is internal, productive and governed — better service without destructive rivalry.
B. Communities & Online Marketplaces
The second audience is made of existing communities and online marketplaces — from the long tail of niche networks to the broader Social & Solidarity Economy (SSE). These groups already have internal transaction flows and trust relationships; WikiDeal offers them a shared home that multiplies their reach without dissolving their autonomy.
4. Community Migrations & Autonomous User Groups
This lever combines Community Migrations with autonomous User Groups: communities migrate their practices onto WikiDeal's framework while keeping their own governance, their own commission rates, and their own contract adaptations. SSE actors — cooperatives, associations, mutual-aid networks — find a platform whose values (commons, fairness, participation) match their own, and whose tooling lets them scale without surrendering control.
5. One Unified Platform: Rings of Trust
Fragmentation is the enemy of small players. This lever unites them: all the small players ally on a single shared platform and, together, outcompete large incumbents — not through acquisition or aggression, but through structural fairness and network effects. Rings of Trust connect User Groups across domains (a babysitter's Miles Credits become usable for tutoring, transport, or festival services), track records follow users across contexts with consent, and contract models are shared and improved collectively. A single, well-governed commons is more powerful than many small private silos.
C. Legal Professionals — Lawyers & Jurists
A distinctive audience for WikiDeal is the legal profession. Lawyers and jurists are not bystanders here — they have an active, remunerated role that turns legal expertise into a growth lever.
6. Legal Facilitation: Coaching, Contracts & Arbitration
This lever combines collaborative contract editing, peer endorsement, and arbitration into a professional opportunity for jurists:
- Coaching & contract formalisation — lawyers help formalise and adapt wiki-edited, versioned, community-validated contract models to specific needs, generating income for them.
- Prevention over cure — by building clear, fair contracts up front, jurists help prevent conflicts rather than litigate them, a more sustainable and reputation-building practice.
- Peer endorsement — volunteer lawyers endorse models and take named, accountable responsibility (Peer Endorsement), making contracts legally credible across jurisdictions.
- Arbitration — jurists can participate in dispute resolution via Arbitration Chambers.
A growing library of ready-to-use contract models in free access (employment, volunteering, bike loan, childcare, tutoring, co-housing, and more) is browsable by anyone; lawyer-endorsed versions add legal credibility. For jurists, WikiDeal is a new field of practice that aligns income with conflict prevention.
D. Users at Large — The Principal Lever for Broad Deployment
The broadest audience — and, as stated in the introduction, the principal lever for large-scale deployment — is the general public who buy and sell services. For them, three advantages combine: lower final prices, more flexible services, and built-in help to prevent and resolve disputes.
7. Fair Commission Fees & Attractive Pricing
What matters most for broad adhesion is attractive pricing — a marketplace with better prices than the competition.
WikiDeal's commission hypothesis ranges from 5–15% (vs. 10–50% for most incumbent platforms; see Revenue Structure). This is not zero — those who deploy and operate services must earn a dignified, decent income. The goal is not to impoverish service providers, but to eliminate extreme profit extraction — the winner-takes-all logic of GAFAM and net-economy IPO culture.
WikiDeal escapes this logic by design. As a commons — governed by Exit to Community and structured around co-opetition — it does not need to conquer. It can grow without buying or destroying competitors, uniting the strength of the small (unir la force des petits) against the large incumbents through structural fairness.
For large portions of the population, a 10–20% saving on everyday services is meaningful — not a luxury, a necessity. When the incumbent extracts 25–35% and WikiDeal charges 5–10%, the difference stays with the service provider and lowers the price for the client:
- Service providers earn more per transaction — or can offer lower prices and still earn the same.
- Clients access services previously unaffordable, or save meaningfully on regular expenditures.
Bootstrapped by volunteering (as on Wikipedia) and sustained by rewards for contributors, attractive pricing and fair, lower commission fees are what make broad adhesion probable.
8. More Flexible Services
WikiDeal is designed to be more flexible than existing marketplaces. This lever combines several innovations into everyday flexibility:
- Many contract models — employment, volunteering, bike loan, childcare, tutoring, co-housing, and more — freely browsable, with lawyer-endorsed versions unlocked via subscription.
- User Groups — autonomous local or thematic communities with their own governance and adaptations.
- Miles Credits — a complementary currency for exchanging housing, transport, food and services within Rings of Trust, beyond cash.
- Open Calls — seasonal invitations to propose improvements, new contract models, or new marketplace types.
Users are not locked into a single offer — they choose the model that fits their community, budget and values. A low subscription barrier reinforces this: anyone can browse freely; the CHF 1/month subscription (CHF 10/year) is due only when a contract is signed, never for browsing.
9. Dispute Prevention & Trust by Design
For users at large, confidence comes from help to prevent and resolve disputes, not from marketing. This lever combines several trust mechanisms:
- Corrective & compensatory measures — dispute resolution via Arbitration Chambers and redress options within contracts, resolving problems fairly without external legal systems.
- Participative Contracts — open, community-validated agreements (like Wikipedia articles) replace opaque ones, making expectations clear up front and preventing conflict.
- 1 user = 1 vote — participatory governance gives users genuine decision-making power, so the platform cannot be redirected against their interests.
- Track records & decentralized, consent-based data — parties can consult or require the other's track record, shared only by mutual agreement within Rings of Trust, building trust gradually without centralised surveillance.
- Community signals — declared interests, User Group membership, volunteering history and Miles Credits use give a richer, more human picture than a star rating.
| Audience | Lever | Key pages |
|---|---|---|
| A. Early adopters | Commons they co-own (Exit to Community) | Exit to Community |
| A. Early adopters | Efficient Funding Mechanism | Bonding Curve |
| A. Early adopters | Organic deployment rewarding initiative | Community Migrations |
| B. Communities & marketplaces | Community Migrations & autonomous User Groups | User Groups |
| B. Communities & marketplaces | One unified platform (Rings of Trust) | Rings of Trust |
| C. Legal professionals | Legal facilitation: coaching, contracts, arbitration | Peer Endorsement |
| D. Users at large | Fair commission fees & attractive pricing | Revenue Structure |
| D. Users at large | More flexible services | Innovations Index |
| D. Users at large | Dispute prevention & trust by design | Arbitration Chambers |
WikiDeal is not a promise of success. It is a structured hypothesis, pursued as citizen science, with a deployment strategy designed to make broad adhesion probable rather than merely possible. These are the reasons we believe there is strong growth potential.