Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Calls:Main: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Visible in-content table of contents (Theo 2026-08-15) |
Terminology: Rewards -> Subscription Tokens |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
{{KidsIntro|An open call is an invitation that says 'come help us!' to anyone with good ideas. This page explains how people can join in and build WikiDeal together.}} | {{KidsIntro|An open call is an invitation that says 'come help us!' to anyone with good ideas. This page explains how people can join in and build WikiDeal together.}} | ||
{{ExpertIntro|Open calls are organised in waves, each with global platform calls and marketplace calls. Wave 1 gathers | {{ExpertIntro|Open calls are organised in waves, each with global platform calls and marketplace calls. Wave 1 gathers early-bird calls (URL structure, graphic charter, funding ecosystem, and successful appeals), offering cash plus Subscription Tokens (no guarantee*). Wave 2 gathers draft calls still under discussion. Evaluation combines a public vote with an expert panel; AI transparency disclosure is mandatory.}} | ||
{{RFC|where=the Discussion tab of each individual call (open the call page in the tables below, then use its Discussion tab), not the Discussion tab of this general page}} | {{RFC|where=the Discussion tab of each individual call (open the call page in the tables below, then use its Discussion tab), not the Discussion tab of this general page}} | ||
{{ArticleSummary| | |||
* [[#gift-economy|Gift Economy and Participation]] | * [[#gift-economy|Gift Economy and Participation]] | ||
* [[#governance-and-lifecycle|Open Call Governance and Lifecycle]] | * [[#governance-and-lifecycle|Open Call Governance and Lifecycle]] | ||
| Line 13: | Line 11: | ||
* [[#at-a-glance|Open Call at a Glance]] | * [[#at-a-glance|Open Call at a Glance]] | ||
* [[#what-can-be-proposed|What Can Be Proposed]] | * [[#what-can-be-proposed|What Can Be Proposed]] | ||
* [[#evaluation-and- | * [[#evaluation-and-subscription tokens|Evaluation and Subscription Tokens]] | ||
* [[#maturity-score|Maturity Score & Open Call Allocation]] | * [[#maturity-score|Maturity Score & Open Call Allocation]] | ||
* [[#state-of-the-art|State of the art]] | * [[#state-of-the-art|State of the art]] | ||
}} | |||
<span id="open-call-waves"></span> | <span id="open-call-waves"></span> | ||
<span id="governance-and-lifecycle"></span> | <span id="governance-and-lifecycle"></span> | ||
<span id="gift-economy"></span> | <span id="gift-economy"></span> | ||
== Gift Economy and Participation == | == Gift Economy and Participation == | ||
Given the early culture of Wikipedia, the online participatory culture, and the importance of the [[wikipedia:Gift_economy|Gift Economy]], unpaid contributions are highly encouraged. Participants often contribute for the recognition and the pleasure of seeing a project deploy relevantly and with consensus. Financial | Given the early culture of Wikipedia, the online participatory culture, and the importance of the [[wikipedia:Gift_economy|Gift Economy]], unpaid contributions are highly encouraged. Participants often contribute for the recognition and the pleasure of seeing a project deploy relevantly and with consensus. Financial subscription tokens or Karma tokens are designed merely to "boost" or stimulate the process so it goes faster; they are not an absolute rule. In fact, some open calls may distribute no money at all. The primary driver remains the gift to the common good. | ||
<span id="governance-and-lifecycle"></span> | <span id="governance-and-lifecycle"></span> | ||
| Line 35: | Line 31: | ||
* '''Steering Committee''': The central committee that oversees the overall Open Call ecosystem. It is responsible for nominating the Facilitator from an emerging pool of high-level experts. It must approve handovers of the Chairperson role. | * '''Steering Committee''': The central committee that oversees the overall Open Call ecosystem. It is responsible for nominating the Facilitator from an emerging pool of high-level experts. It must approve handovers of the Chairperson role. | ||
* '''Chairperson''': Gathers the state of the art and formalizes the initial hypothesis with peers. Submits the preliminary versions to the scientific council and steering committee before any funds are distributed. Note that '''co-chairing''' is possible, and the role of Chairperson can be handed over (transmission of chairing) during the lifecycle. This is because analyzing proposals scientifically and accompanying their practical implementation are different roles, and some Chairs might be mandated specifically to accompany the implementation phase. | * '''Chairperson''': Gathers the state of the art and formalizes the initial hypothesis with peers. Submits the preliminary versions to the scientific council and steering committee before any funds are distributed. Note that '''co-chairing''' is possible, and the role of Chairperson can be handed over (transmission of chairing) during the lifecycle. This is because analyzing proposals scientifically and accompanying their practical implementation are different roles, and some Chairs might be mandated specifically to accompany the implementation phase. | ||
* '''Facilitator''': Acts as the executive secretariat. This is a highly skilled expert in forum discussion management who accompanies the call from A to Z: design, communication, managing comments and reviews, overseeing the | * '''Facilitator''': Acts as the executive secretariat. This is a highly skilled expert in forum discussion management who accompanies the call from A to Z: design, communication, managing comments and reviews, overseeing the subscription token attribution process, and monitoring the implementation of selected projects. | ||
* '''Commission''': Created specifically for each call (ranging from 3 to 9 members, following the Swiss executive model). It can include: | * '''Commission''': Created specifically for each call (ranging from 3 to 9 members, following the Swiss executive model). It can include: | ||
** Public participants answering a public call to evaluate. | ** Public participants answering a public call to evaluate. | ||
| Line 47: | Line 43: | ||
# '''Nomination & Commission Formation''': The Chairperson is appointed, and a list of invited guests/evaluators is presented to the Steering Committee. The Commission is formed (mix of public, paid, and volunteer members). | # '''Nomination & Commission Formation''': The Chairperson is appointed, and a list of invited guests/evaluators is presented to the Steering Committee. The Commission is formed (mix of public, paid, and volunteer members). | ||
# '''Evaluation''': The Commission evaluates the submitted proposals. | # '''Evaluation''': The Commission evaluates the submitted proposals. | ||
# '''Initial | # '''Initial Subscription Token Attribution''': Usually, 50% of the promised sum is awarded immediately upon selection. | ||
# '''Implementation Support''': The Facilitator and the Commission assist the winner(s) in implementing the project (e.g., software development, video production, recruitment campaigns). Members of the Commission can volunteer to participate in evaluating these concrete results. | # '''Implementation Support''': The Facilitator and the Commission assist the winner(s) in implementing the project (e.g., software development, video production, recruitment campaigns). Members of the Commission can volunteer to participate in evaluating these concrete results. | ||
# '''Final Evaluation & Remaining Attribution''': Depending on the specific call, the remaining 50% is awarded 1 to 3 years later, contingent on how well the idea is implemented and sustained. | # '''Final Evaluation & Remaining Attribution''': Depending on the specific call, the remaining 50% is awarded 1 to 3 years later, contingent on how well the idea is implemented and sustained. | ||
| Line 54: | Line 50: | ||
<span id="waves"></span> | <span id="waves"></span> | ||
== Open call waves == | == Open call waves == | ||
Open calls are organised in '''waves''', and each wave has '''two parts''': the calls that concern '''WikiDeal as a global platform''' (structure, identity, management), and the calls that concern '''specific marketplaces'''. Wave 1 gathers the | Open calls are organised in '''waves''', and each wave has '''two parts''': the calls that concern '''WikiDeal as a global platform''' (structure, identity, management), and the calls that concern '''specific marketplaces'''. Wave 1 gathers the '''early bird''' calls, the pilot experience calls, also called open calls '''for pioneers''': they are launched before the steering committee is formed, and they are especially open to Wiki experts (experts in Wiki design and use). Their informal launch is planned for '''1 January 2027 (to be confirmed)''', the beginning of the year, which celebrates the 25th anniversary of Wikipedia. Wave 2 gathers draft calls that are still under discussion: they are listed below, and the list itself is intended to evolve. | ||
<span id="level-1"></span><span id="wave-1"></span> | <span id="level-1"></span><span id="wave-1"></span> | ||
| Line 63: | Line 59: | ||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
|- | |- | ||
! Open call !! Wave !! Status !! Deadline !! | ! Open call !! Wave !! Status !! Deadline !! Subscription Tokens | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Calls:URL-Structure|URL naming and general structure]] || 1 || Launched || No deadline: open until a first simple version has been adopted || CHF 1,000 in direct cash + CHF 10,000 in [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/ | | [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Calls:URL-Structure|URL naming and general structure]] || 1 || Launched || No deadline: open until a first simple version has been adopted || CHF 1,000 in direct cash + CHF 10,000 in [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Subscription Tokens|Subscription Tokens]] (no guarantee*) | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Calls:Graphic-Charter|Graphic charter]] || 1 || Launched || No deadline: open until a first simple version has been adopted || CHF 1,000 in direct cash + CHF 10,000 in [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/ | | [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Calls:Graphic-Charter|Graphic charter]] || 1 || Launched || No deadline: open until a first simple version has been adopted || CHF 1,000 in direct cash + CHF 10,000 in [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Subscription Tokens|Subscription Tokens]] (no guarantee*) | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Calls:Funding-Ecosystem-Development|Funding ecosystem development (software developers)]] || 1 || Launched || None announced: open until a provider is selected and mandated || US$ 1,000 in direct cash + 30,000 in [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/ | | [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Calls:Funding-Ecosystem-Development|Funding ecosystem development (software developers)]] || 1 || Launched || None announced: open until a provider is selected and mandated || US$ 1,000 in direct cash + 30,000 in [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Subscription Tokens|Subscription Tokens]] (no guarantee*), indicative, for about 100 hours | ||
|} | |} | ||
| Line 77: | Line 73: | ||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
|- | |- | ||
! Open call !! Wave !! Status !! Deadline !! | ! Open call !! Wave !! Status !! Deadline !! Subscription Tokens | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Calls: | | [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Calls:Successful-Appeals|Successful appeals and oppositions against unfair constraints]] || 1 || Launched || To be confirmed (probably 6 months) || First tranche of CHF 1,000 in direct cash (Switzerland); global envelope envisaged up to CHF 100,000 for about 1,000 models (no guarantee*) | ||
|} | |} | ||
| Line 86: | Line 82: | ||
<span id="level-2"></span><span id="wave-2"></span> | <span id="level-2"></span><span id="wave-2"></span> | ||
=== Wave 2: still under discussion === | === Wave 2: still under discussion === | ||
Wave 2 calls are drafts under construction. They have not been launched yet. We have moved the full list of these draft calls to a dedicated page so they don't mix with active calls. | Wave 2 calls are drafts under construction. They have not been launched yet. We have moved the full list of these draft calls to a dedicated page so they don't mix with active calls. This includes the tutorial videos on small loans, which has been moved to this wave. | ||
👉 '''[[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Calls:Under Study|See the full list of Open Calls currently under study]]''' | 👉 '''[[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Calls:Under Study|See the full list of Open Calls currently under study]]''' | ||
| Line 106: | Line 102: | ||
These early bird calls are structured a bit like the open calls of European research and innovation programmes, but in a softer, lighter and less administrative way. There is no consortium to build and no heavy paperwork: they are micro calls for ideas, open to anyone who brings relevant and useful ideas to the cause. | These early bird calls are structured a bit like the open calls of European research and innovation programmes, but in a softer, lighter and less administrative way. There is no consortium to build and no heavy paperwork: they are micro calls for ideas, open to anyone who brings relevant and useful ideas to the cause. | ||
The steering committee intends to meet periodically, review all the ideas posted, and attribute the | The steering committee intends to meet periodically, review all the ideas posted, and attribute the subscription tokens. For each call, the subscription tokens are intended to be distributed across several people: contributors who bring complementary ideas, who comment on the proposals of others, and who help each other. The calls are not a cold competition where one person wins and the others lose. The goal is to have several winners, because they helped each other. | ||
<span id="rules-of-the-game"></span> | <span id="rules-of-the-game"></span> | ||
| Line 118: | Line 114: | ||
* Part of the sum, up to half (for example CHF 500 out of CHF 1,000), can be withheld for up to one year, in order to verify that the ideas last: this is the '''maturity criterion'''. If the ideas have lasted, the second half is intended to be paid to the person who brought the main ideas, as an increase of the donation. | * Part of the sum, up to half (for example CHF 500 out of CHF 1,000), can be withheld for up to one year, in order to verify that the ideas last: this is the '''maturity criterion'''. If the ideas have lasted, the second half is intended to be paid to the person who brought the main ideas, as an increase of the donation. | ||
* What matters is to distinguish a solid base from a flash in the pan. | * What matters is to distinguish a solid base from a flash in the pan. | ||
* Not every call is monetised. Some calls may start with no money distribution at all: only [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/ | * Not every call is monetised. Some calls may start with no money distribution at all: only [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Subscription Tokens|Subscription Tokens]] (no guarantee*), or even no subscription token of any kind. Contributing without claiming any subscription token is always possible: the subscription token is one possible motivation among others, never an exclusive one. What matters is to make a project live together, to let a community emerge, and to answer societal challenges linked to the founding research question, [[Gov/en/Portal:Onboarding/Glossary:Founding Question|"Can users own, run and sustain a global marketplace?"]]. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| Line 130: | Line 126: | ||
| Periodic (cycle dates not yet defined) | | Periodic (cycle dates not yet defined) | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | Subscription Tokens | ||
| Direct cash and [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/ | | Direct cash and [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Subscription Tokens|Subscription Tokens]] (no guarantee*) | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Karma token | | Karma token subscription tokens | ||
| [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Karma-Tokens|Karma tokens]], usable for services in the ecosystem | | [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Karma-Tokens|Karma tokens]], usable for services in the ecosystem | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 152: | Line 148: | ||
''Note: You can also propose entirely new open calls. See [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Calls:Propose a Call|Propose an Open Call]].'' | ''Note: You can also propose entirely new open calls. See [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Calls:Propose a Call|Propose an Open Call]].'' | ||
Open Call proposals fall into two categories. '''Improvement proposals''' take the current Prototype 1 model as a given and propose enhancements: a better formula for distributing [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/ | Open Call proposals fall into two categories. '''Improvement proposals''' take the current Prototype 1 model as a given and propose enhancements: a better formula for distributing [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Subscription Tokens|Subscription Tokens]] (no guarantee*), a new mechanism for onboarding [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:User Groups|User Groups]], an improved arbitration process. '''Substitution proposals''' challenge one or more elements of Prototype 1 and propose replacements: an alternative [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Bonding Curve|bonding curve]] formula, a different governance structure, a new approach to Commission calculation. Proposals that entirely abandon the WikiDeal model are out of scope; the Open Calls are about improving and diversifying, not about starting over. | ||
=== Theory vs. Practice: Concept and Implementation === | === Theory vs. Practice: Concept and Implementation === | ||
| Line 162: | Line 158: | ||
The ultimate goal of Open Calls is to stimulate the transformation of ideas into realistic, implementable results. Ideas are fully recognized when they are not only brilliant but also '''realizable''' within acceptable constraints of time, budget, and skills. | The ultimate goal of Open Calls is to stimulate the transformation of ideas into realistic, implementable results. Ideas are fully recognized when they are not only brilliant but also '''realizable''' within acceptable constraints of time, budget, and skills. | ||
During the evaluation, the Commission assesses the '''degree of completeness''' (degré de finitude) of a proposal. Is it fully mature, or does it need further refinement? Participants can work alone, form groups, or combine their strengths (e.g., one group brings an unfinished idea, another brings the skills to finalize and implement it) and share the | During the evaluation, the Commission assesses the '''degree of completeness''' (degré de finitude) of a proposal. Is it fully mature, or does it need further refinement? Participants can work alone, form groups, or combine their strengths (e.g., one group brings an unfinished idea, another brings the skills to finalize and implement it) and share the subscription token. Depending on the call, the expectations may range from a simple concept to a fully operational deployment, covering all or part of the typical CDIEM cycle (Conception, Design, Implementation, Evaluation, Maintenance). | ||
A valid proposal must specify: the exact change proposed; the costs of implementing it; the expected benefits and the evidence base for those expectations; compatibility with the membership-based entry system (memberships must remain in all proposals); the proposer's own capacity to contribute to implementation; and the full AI transparency disclosure if any AI tools were used. Proposals lacking these elements are returned for completion before formal evaluation. | A valid proposal must specify: the exact change proposed; the costs of implementing it; the expected benefits and the evidence base for those expectations; compatibility with the membership-based entry system (memberships must remain in all proposals); the proposer's own capacity to contribute to implementation; and the full AI transparency disclosure if any AI tools were used. Proposals lacking these elements are returned for completion before formal evaluation. | ||
<span id="evaluation-and- | <span id="evaluation-and-subscription tokens"></span> | ||
== Evaluation and | == Evaluation and Subscription Tokens == | ||
Each periodic evaluation combines a public vote (accessible to all WikiDeal membership holders) with a structured expert panel review. The expert panel includes platform cooperative specialists, legal scholars, economists familiar with commons governance, and at least one representative from the Living Labs research community. The panel's role is not to override the public vote but to ensure that winning proposals are technically feasible and legally compliant. | Each periodic evaluation combines a public vote (accessible to all WikiDeal membership holders) with a structured expert panel review. The expert panel includes platform cooperative specialists, legal scholars, economists familiar with commons governance, and at least one representative from the Living Labs research community. The panel's role is not to override the public vote but to ensure that winning proposals are technically feasible and legally compliant. | ||
Subscription Tokens can combine several complementary forms: direct cash payments, [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Subscription Tokens|Subscription Tokens]] (no guarantee*), which represent a conditional claim on future subscription revenue, and [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Karma-Tokens|Karma tokens]], which can be exchanged for services within the WikiDeal ecosystem. See [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Subscription Tokens|Subscription Tokens]] for the full picture. For each call, a specific prize is attributed depending on the available funds, the importance, the urgency, and the complexity of the challenge. There may be multiple winners in a cycle, a main prize and a complementary prize, to recognise proposals that work well together. The Open Calls are designed to remain genuinely community-driven, with evaluation guided by public vote and independent expert review. | |||
<span id="maturity-score"></span> | <span id="maturity-score"></span> | ||
== Maturity Score & Open Call Allocation == | == Maturity Score & Open Call Allocation == | ||
Maturity Scores are specifically designed to evaluate the communities managing the different topics, known as '''[[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:User Groups|User Groups]]'''. Open Call resources are allocated based on these scores: the higher a User Group's Maturity Score, the fewer Open Call resources it receives, because mature communities are largely self-sustaining. Conversely, early-stage groups receive maximum Open Call attention and | Maturity Scores are specifically designed to evaluate the communities managing the different topics, known as '''[[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:User Groups|User Groups]]'''. Open Call resources are allocated based on these scores: the higher a User Group's Maturity Score, the fewer Open Call resources it receives, because mature communities are largely self-sustaining. Conversely, early-stage groups receive maximum Open Call attention and subscription tokens to help them grow. | ||
=== Commissions as Incubators for User Groups === | === Commissions as Incubators for User Groups === | ||
| Line 202: | Line 197: | ||
'''See also:''' [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Calls:FAQ|Open Call FAQ]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:Meta/Prototype-1-Deliverables|Prototype 1 Deliverables]] · [[:Category:Deliverables|Deliverables]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/User-Group-Maturity|User Group Maturity Assessment]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Main|All innovations]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:Institutions/Governance|Governance]] | '''See also:''' [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Calls:FAQ|Open Call FAQ]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:Meta/Prototype-1-Deliverables|Prototype 1 Deliverables]] · [[:Category:Deliverables|Deliverables]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/User-Group-Maturity|User Group Maturity Assessment]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Main|All innovations]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:Institutions/Governance|Governance]] | ||
[[Category:Innovation]] | [[Category:Innovation]] | ||
<!-- visible --> | <!-- visible --> | ||
[[Category:Open Calls]] | [[Category:Open Calls]] | ||