Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Arbitration Chambers: Difference between revisions
Migration content (make visible in Recent changes) |
Remove hard {{NotApproved}} notice (redundant with auto-generated ApprovedRevs notice) — Theo request 2026-06-20 |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{KidsIntro|When people disagree, WikiDeal has fair referees who listen to both sides and decide together. There are small local referees and bigger ones for harder problems.}} | {{KidsIntro|When people disagree, WikiDeal has fair referees who listen to both sides and decide together. There are small local referees and bigger ones for harder problems.}} | ||
== Arbitration Chambers == | == Arbitration Chambers == | ||
Revision as of 15:03, 20 June 2026
💡 In simple words: When people disagree, WikiDeal has fair referees who listen to both sides and decide together. There are small local referees and bigger ones for harder problems.
Arbitration Chambers
Innovation — WikiDeal R&D
| Origin | 🔵🟢 Théo Bondolfi (inspired by Wikimedia ArbCom) |
| Status | Prototype 1 — In testing |
What is it?
Arbitration Chambers form a three-level dispute-resolution system inspired by Wikimedia's Arbitration Committee. Disputes start in local chambers, can rise to an intermediate instance tied to a domain or portal, and finally reach an ultimate authority. The top level uses Condorcet voting and can include public citizen debates with mixed panels of experts and ordinary members.
How it works on WikiDeal
Most conflicts are meant to be resolved close to where they arise, with escalation reserved for harder cases. Public, transparent debate and accountable, named arbitrators are central to the design. The detailed procedures, eligibility, and timelines will be documented progressively as the platform evolves.
See also: All innovations · R&D Portal