Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Annual Value Increase: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Category cleanup: remove Category:Migration June 2026 (founder order 2026-09-03) |
Terminology: Rewards -> Subscription Tokens |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{KidsIntro|Imagine giving money to help build a platform for everyone. As thanks, your | {{KidsIntro|Imagine giving money to help build a platform for everyone. As thanks, your subscription token could grow a little each year, like 5%. To pay for that, the monthly fee would also grow yearly. A study should check this stays fair.}} | ||
{{ExpertIntro|This Wave 2 Open Call study explores a 5% annual value increase as a long-term substitute for the bonding-curve multiplier, aiming to provide a stable, non-usurious return for donors. To fund it, the base subscription would rise about 5% yearly. The study would assess feasibility and socio-economic risks, especially affordability in developing nations.}} | {{ExpertIntro|This Wave 2 Open Call study explores a 5% annual value increase as a long-term substitute for the bonding-curve multiplier, aiming to provide a stable, non-usurious return for donors. To fund it, the base subscription would rise about 5% yearly. The study would assess feasibility and socio-economic risks, especially affordability in developing nations.}} | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
Early funding rounds require high bonding curve multipliers (such as x100 or x30 in Prototype 1) because the risk is very high. However, as the platform matures, the risk decreases. In Prototype 2, the multiplier is expected to drop from x30 down to x10, or even down to x1. | Early funding rounds require high bonding curve multipliers (such as x100 or x30 in Prototype 1) because the risk is very high. However, as the platform matures, the risk decreases. In Prototype 2, the multiplier is expected to drop from x30 down to x10, or even down to x1. | ||
Ultimately, the goal is to phase out the bonding curve multiplier entirely. In its place, the only advantage or potential return for a donor would be a steady 5% annual increase on the | Ultimately, the goal is to phase out the bonding curve multiplier entirely. In its place, the only advantage or potential return for a donor would be a steady 5% annual increase on the subscription token. In Switzerland, a 5% rate is considered non-usurious and perfectly acceptable. | ||
<span id="subscription-impact"></span> | <span id="subscription-impact"></span> | ||
== Impact on subscriptions and the mutualist vision == | == Impact on subscriptions and the mutualist vision == | ||
To fund a 5% annual increase on | To fund a 5% annual increase on subscription tokens, the monthly subscription fee must also increase by 5% annually. | ||
For example, starting at a base of CHF 1 per month, a 5% annual increase means the subscription would reach approximately CHF 3 per month in about 22 years. | For example, starting at a base of CHF 1 per month, a 5% annual increase means the subscription would reach approximately CHF 3 per month in about 22 years. | ||