Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Research:Why-And-How-It-Can-Work: Difference between revisions
Operation Funding cleanup: subscription as micro-payment inside transaction fees (example CHF 20 transport / CHF 1 subscription) + Category:Funding |
Category cleanup: remove Category:Migration June 2026 (founder order 2026-09-03) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{KidsIntro|This page explains why and how WikiDeal can grow and work for many people around the world. It talks about fair prices, trust, and how everyone can join together to make one big shared marketplace.}} | {{KidsIntro|This page explains why and how WikiDeal can grow and work for many people around the world. It talks about fair prices, trust, and how everyone can join together to make one big shared marketplace.}} | ||
{{ExpertIntro|This page lays out the success levers behind WikiDeal's deployment strategy, audience by audience: early adopters co-owning a commons, communities migrating in, legal professionals formalising contracts, and users at large attracted by lower prices, flexibility and dispute prevention. Includes the cold-start answer: dogfooding, a babysitting first use case, and a two-tranche funding plan.}} | {{ExpertIntro|This page lays out the success levers behind WikiDeal's deployment strategy, audience by audience: early adopters co-owning a commons, communities migrating in, legal professionals formalising contracts, and users at large attracted by lower prices, flexibility and dispute prevention. Includes the cold-start answer: dogfooding, a babysitting first use case, and a two-tranche funding plan.}} | ||
= Why and How WikiDeal Can Work: Deployment Strategy & Shared Vision = | = Why and How WikiDeal Can Work: Deployment Strategy & Shared Vision = | ||
| Line 110: | Line 109: | ||
Because commissions stay below those of incumbent platforms, this combination (lower fees plus an embedded subscription) is intended to keep WikiDeal cheaper overall while funding redistribution: up to 100% of these subscriptions could flow back to [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Rewards|Reward]] holders. This could make redistribution significantly faster than a fixed pro-rata scheme (for instance, faster than a one-in-200-million ratio); the exact allocation ratio is intended to be adjusted along the way, through the [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Calls:Main|Open Call]] process. | Because commissions stay below those of incumbent platforms, this combination (lower fees plus an embedded subscription) is intended to keep WikiDeal cheaper overall while funding redistribution: up to 100% of these subscriptions could flow back to [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Rewards|Reward]] holders. This could make redistribution significantly faster than a fixed pro-rata scheme (for instance, faster than a one-in-200-million ratio); the exact allocation ratio is intended to be adjusted along the way, through the [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Calls:Main|Open Call]] process. | ||
<span id="8-more-flexible-services"></span> | <span id="8-more-flexible-services"></span> | ||
| Line 251: | Line 249: | ||
[[Category:Funding]] | [[Category:Funding]] | ||
[[Category:Innovation]] | [[Category:Innovation]] | ||