Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Reverse Abuse: Difference between revisions
Visible in-content table of contents (Theo 2026-08-15) |
Standardise manual summary: On this page list wrapped in Template:ArticleSummary, same entries (Theo 2026-08-17) |
||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
A tea picker, a cocoa farmer or a garment maker typically receives a small fraction of what consumers pay, not because any single manager is malicious, but because the legal architecture of global supply chains channels value toward holding companies. Reverse Abuse starts from the users' side of that chain: what if producers themselves owned the holding structures, so the surplus flowed back to them? This page presents the hypothesis, its safeguards, and how the community could take it forward. | A tea picker, a cocoa farmer or a garment maker typically receives a small fraction of what consumers pay, not because any single manager is malicious, but because the legal architecture of global supply chains channels value toward holding companies. Reverse Abuse starts from the users' side of that chain: what if producers themselves owned the holding structures, so the surplus flowed back to them? This page presents the hypothesis, its safeguards, and how the community could take it forward. | ||
{{ArticleSummary| | |||
* [[#what-is-it|What is Reverse Abuse?]] | * [[#what-is-it|What is Reverse Abuse?]] | ||
* [[#the-problem|The problem: extractive financial architecture]] | * [[#the-problem|The problem: extractive financial architecture]] | ||
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
* [[#status|Status and next steps]] | * [[#status|Status and next steps]] | ||
* [[#state-of-the-art|State of the art]] | * [[#state-of-the-art|State of the art]] | ||
}} | |||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||