Jump to content
Gov  ·  Market  ·  Community  ·  Policies  ·  Funding  ·  Open Calls  ·  Get started

Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:User Groups: Difference between revisions

Add details about User Groups being incubated via Open Calls
Add Related scientific research section (Theo 2026-08-15)
Line 61: Line 61:


WikiDeal's roadmap includes User Groups for: babysitting (global launch, multiple regional groups); private tutoring (language-based and subject-based groups); pet care (sitting, walking, veterinary facilitation); bicycle and tool lending cooperatives; local food markets and community-supported agriculture; freelance creative services; and language learning exchanges. Each of these domains has an established informal economy that is (illustrative example) either unplatformed (and therefore lacks trust Infrastructure) or over-platformed (and therefore paying excessive Commissions to extractive intermediaries).
WikiDeal's roadmap includes User Groups for: babysitting (global launch, multiple regional groups); private tutoring (language-based and subject-based groups); pet care (sitting, walking, veterinary facilitation); bicycle and tool lending cooperatives; local food markets and community-supported agriculture; freelance creative services; and language learning exchanges. Each of these domains has an established informal economy that is (illustrative example) either unplatformed (and therefore lacks trust Infrastructure) or over-platformed (and therefore paying excessive Commissions to extractive intermediaries).
<span id="related-research"></span>
== Related scientific research ==
Autonomous user communities as the core of a marketplace relate to research on communities of practice, online community design, commons governance, and long tail economics. These works inform the User Groups hypothesis.
* Chris Anderson (2006), ''The Long Tail: Why the Future of Business Is Selling Less of More'', Hyperion, on how niche communities can thrive alongside mass offers: [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Long_Tail_(book) book page on Wikipedia].
* Etienne Wenger, Richard McDermott and William M. Snyder (2002), ''Cultivating Communities of Practice: A Guide to Managing Knowledge'', Harvard Business School Press: [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community_of_practice community of practice on Wikipedia].
* Robert E. Kraut and Paul Resnick (2012), ''Building Successful Online Communities: Evidence-Based Social Design'', MIT Press: [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_E._Kraut author page on Wikipedia].
* Jenny Preece (2000), ''Online Communities: Designing Usability, Supporting Sociability'', John Wiley & Sons: [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jenny_Preece author page on Wikipedia].
* Michael Cox, Gwen Arnold and Sergio Villamayor-Tomás (2010), ''A Review of Design Principles for Community-based Natural Resource Management'', Ecology and Society, 15(4): [https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03704-150438 doi:10.5751/ES-03704-150438] · [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elinor_Ostrom Ostrom design principles on Wikipedia].


'''See also:''' [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Coopetition|Co-opetition]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Main|All innovations]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Main|R&D Portal]]
'''See also:''' [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Coopetition|Co-opetition]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Main|All innovations]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Main|R&D Portal]]