Gov/en/Portal:Meta/AI-Assisted-Questions: Difference between revisions
New page: asking questions with AI, neutralization + conservation, retrieval service with pearls and trends (Theo 2026-07-25) |
Shorten intros per Theo's 20s rule |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{KidsIntro|You can ask | {{KidsIntro|You can ask questions about WikiDeal with an AI. Your questions are kept anonymous, and everyone can read them later. A service then fishes out good ideas the AI missed (the pearls) and shows the most-asked subjects (the trends).}} | ||
{{ExpertIntro|WikiDeal intends to let participants use AI to ask | {{ExpertIntro|WikiDeal intends to let participants use AI to ask questions. Each would be neutralized and conserved with links to contributions and answers, so they can be analysed. A retrieval service would then produce two outputs: pearls (good proposals the AI wrongly judged) and trends (statistics on subjects). This is an initial hypothesis, offered for discussion.}} | ||
__TOC__ | __TOC__ | ||
Latest revision as of 02:55, 9 August 2026
💡 In simple words: You can ask questions about WikiDeal with an AI. Your questions are kept anonymous, and everyone can read them later. A service then fishes out good ideas the AI missed (the pearls) and shows the most-asked subjects (the trends).
🎯 In 20 seconds (scientific summary): WikiDeal intends to let participants use AI to ask questions. Each would be neutralized and conserved with links to contributions and answers, so they can be analysed. A retrieval service would then produce two outputs: pearls (good proposals the AI wrongly judged) and trends (statistics on subjects). This is an initial hypothesis, offered for discussion.
Asking questions with AI
Ask your questions with AI
Participants can use AI to ask their questions about WikiDeal: how the platform works, the contracts, the funding, the governance, and so on. The AI provides first answers, available at any time.
Neutralization and conservation
These questions are the object of a neutralization and a conservation:
- Neutralization: personal details are removed and the wording is made neutral, so that the question can be published without exposing the person who asked it.
- Conservation: the questions are kept, with a link giving access to the contributions, the discussions and the answers of the AIs, so that they can always be analysed, by anyone, at any time.
This follows the same spirit as WikiDeal's AI transparency rule: what the AI says and how it is used remains open and auditable.
The retrieval service: pearls and trends
On top of this conserved corpus, a retrieval service ("repêchage") is envisaged, with two outputs:
- The pearls 🦪: what was missed. Good proposals that were wrongly judged by the AI and deserve a second look. Human review fishes them back out of the corpus, so that a valuable idea is never lost just because an AI misjudged it.
- The trends 📊: the percentages of subjects that are heavily treated, and similar statistics. They show what the community asks about most, and can inform priorities.
This is what would be used and analysed over time; the exact mechanisms are still to be defined.
See also
- WikiDeal Internal AI (AI transparency rule, audit trail)
- AI deviation risks
- AI Disclaimer