Jump to content
Gov  ·  Market  ·  Community  ·  Policies  ·  Funding  ·  Open Calls  ·  Get started

Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Double Commission: Difference between revisions

From WikiDeal
Refine tone and structure per Theo
Rewrite based on Theo's audio (2026-08-07): Real cost vs speculative profit, hybrid volunteer/professional model, flexible commission packages with internal competition, socio-economic rebalancing (long tail, Bolsa Familia comparison), and philosophical vision.
Line 1: Line 1:
{{KidsIntro|When something is exchanged on WikiDeal, two tiny, clearly shown fees help keep the platform and the local group running. No secret charges.}}
{{KidsIntro|When people exchange things on WikiDeal, they only pay the "real cost" to keep the platform running safely. There are no secret fees to make rich owners richer. It's like a cooperative where everyone works together to keep prices fair and low.}}
{{ExpertIntro|The Double Commission is a proposed fee structure: each transaction would carry a very small platform fee (about 2-3%) plus a small User Group fee (about 7-8%), both at cost and published openly. It intends to replace the opaque, extractive single fees of commercial platforms.}}
{{ExpertIntro|The Double Commission is a proposed fee structure designed to operate strictly at "real cost." It consists of a platform fee to maintain technical infrastructure and a User Group fee for local organization. Unlike speculative platforms that extract profit for shareholders, this cooperative model eliminates profit margins, aiming for commissions roughly 20% lower than commercial equivalents. The model combines professional services with volunteer contributions to maintain affordability, supporting socio-economic rebalancing and the "long tail" of independent actors.}}


{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
|-
|-
| Origin || 🔵 Wikimedia Foundation
| Origin || 🔵 Wikimedia Foundation / Cooperative models
|-
|-
| Status || Prototype 1 - In testing
| Status || Prototype 1 - In testing
|}
|}


Most people who sell a service through a commercial platform discover, sometimes with surprise, how much of the price never reaches them. The problem is structural rather than personal: closed platforms have shareholders to satisfy, so fees tend to grow and stay opaque. The Double Commission aims to take the opposite path: two small, visible fees, each with a clear purpose, so that a provider always knows exactly where every franc goes.
Most people who sell a service through a commercial platform discover, sometimes with surprise, how much of the price never reaches them. The problem is structural: closed platforms have shareholders to satisfy, so fees tend to grow opaquely to generate profit. The Double Commission aims to take the opposite path: a cooperative approach operating strictly at '''real cost'''.


__TOC__
__TOC__


<span id="the-need"></span>
<span id="real-cost"></span>
== The need: fees people can actually see ==
== The core principle: At real cost, without profit ==
Consider Karim, who offers gardening services. On a typical commercial marketplace he might lose 10% to 50% of the price to commissions whose breakdown he never sees. On WikiDeal, the intention is that Karim would see two lines, both published: one for the shared platform, one for his local community. Lower price and transparency are two of WikiDeal's four guiding aims, and this mechanism is where they meet in daily use.
The fundamental concept behind the Double Commission is the "real cost" economy, inspired by housing cooperatives (like those under the Swiss Federal Office for Housing) and mutual insurance cooperatives.  
 
Because WikiDeal has no investors seeking dividends—only users acting as partners—there is no need to generate a profit margin. The commissions are defined transparently based on what is strictly necessary to run the service: accounting audits, daily management, and infrastructure.
 
This model aims to be '''approximately 20% cheaper''' than speculative commercial platforms. For example, in the transport sector where commercial platforms might charge 30%, a cooperative approach could lower this to around 10%. In the housing sector, cooperative rents are typically 20% below speculative market rates.
 
<span id="volunteering-and-professionalization"></span>
== Combining professionalization and volunteering ==
To maintain these low real costs, the ecosystem relies on a hybrid model. During the startup phase, and permanently thereafter, the system mixes professional paid work (salaries or mandates) with volunteer contributions.
 
This is similar to the evolution of the Wikimedia Foundation and its User Groups over 25 years: moving from a single structure to dozens of professionalized entities, but always retaining a strong base of volunteering. Some people might provide paid services, while others volunteer time to support the cooperative itself. The cursor between volunteerism and professionalization adjusts dynamically, but the primary indicator remains constant: keeping real costs low and affordable.


<span id="how-it-works"></span>
<span id="how-it-works"></span>
== How it is intended to work ==
== How the Double Commission works ==
Every transaction on WikiDeal would carry two transparent commissions: a very small WikiDeal platform fee and a small User Group fee. Both would be charged at cost and shown openly. The platform fee sustains the common technical and governance infrastructure, while the User Group fee supports the local or thematic community handling the exchange. Exact rate-setting and governance of these commissions are being documented progressively as the platform evolves.
Every transaction on WikiDeal would carry two transparent commissions:
* '''The WikiDeal platform fee''': sustains the common technical and governance infrastructure.
* '''The User Group fee''': supports the local or thematic community handling the exchange (organization, welcoming newcomers, support).
 
Both are charged strictly at cost and shown openly.  
 
<span id="flexible-packages"></span>
=== Flexible packages and internal competition ===
Commissions are not fixed, universal percentages. They are flexibilized based on user choices and the specific policies of different [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:User Groups|User Groups]].
 
For instance, a User Group might offer a commission package that includes mandatory cancellation insurance or high-level support, while another might offer a lower commission with no insurance and less support. For recurring transactions (like a long-term rental extension or regular transport), the effort required from the platform drops, and the commission could drop proportionally.
 
This creates healthy internal competition: User Groups will propose different definitions of "real cost" and different service packages, allowing users to make conscious choices.
 
<span id="socio-economic-impact"></span>
== Socio-economic rebalancing (The Long Tail) ==
By operating at real cost, the Double Commission does more than just lower prices. It is a tool for socio-economic rebalancing.
 
In today's speculative economy, transaction after transaction, a fraction of the value is siphoned off to a tiny minority—the 1% who own the majority of global wealth (as highlighted by UN inequality reports). By eliminating this extractive profit, value stays within the "long tail" of independent actors and local communities. The goal is not to aggressively crush competitors like multinational tech monopolies do, but to inclusively gather all the actors of the long tail into a fair-trade framework.


<span id="the-breakdown"></span>
Keeping costs low also acts as a powerful support mechanism for families in socio-economic fragility. Much like institutional social programs (such as the ''Bolsa Família'' in Brazil, where [https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/785831468234882195/pdf/879610NWP0Bols00Box385214B00PUBLIC0.pdf reports show] most beneficiaries use the aid for an average of 3 years before exiting poverty), the WikiDeal cooperative model aims to provide temporary, community-driven economic relief that helps people get back on their feet.
== The breakdown: how transactions would be split ==
To support fairness and transparency, the value of a transaction is intended to be distributed as follows:
* '''85% to 90%''' goes directly to the service or product provider.
* '''7% to 8%''' goes to the local or thematic User Group to fund community organization and support.
* '''2% to 3%''' goes to the WikiDeal platform to maintain the common technical infrastructure and governance.


<span id="roles"></span>
<span id="philosophical-vision"></span>
== Who does what ==
== Philosophical vision: Taking back the economy ==
* '''Providers''' receive the large majority of the price and can verify the published rates.
Ultimately, the Double Commission is tied to WikiDeal's [[Gov/en/Portal:Meta/Main|Founding Question]]. It represents a philosophical shift: users taking the economy back into their own hands to manage it better.  
* '''User Groups''' use their share to organize, welcome newcomers and support local exchanges.
* '''The platform''' maintains shared infrastructure at cost, with rates set through community governance rather than by a private owner.


<span id="why-it-matters"></span>
It proves that a global marketplace can be owned, run, and sustained by its users, at real cost, turning an extractive economy into a mutualist one.
== Why it matters for the ecosystem ==
Keeping fees small, at cost and visible supports flexibility (communities can adapt their local share to real needs), lower prices for everyone, and citizen participation in deciding how the money is used. The point is not that commercial platforms are run by bad people; it is that a community-governed structure removes the incentive to hide or inflate fees in the first place.


----
----
Line 43: Line 62:
[[Category:Migration June 2026]]
[[Category:Migration June 2026]]
[[Category:Innovation]]
[[Category:Innovation]]
<!-- visible -->

Revision as of 17:55, 7 August 2026

💡 In simple words: When people exchange things on WikiDeal, they only pay the "real cost" to keep the platform running safely. There are no secret fees to make rich owners richer. It's like a cooperative where everyone works together to keep prices fair and low.

🎯 In 20 seconds (scientific summary): The Double Commission is a proposed fee structure designed to operate strictly at "real cost." It consists of a platform fee to maintain technical infrastructure and a User Group fee for local organization. Unlike speculative platforms that extract profit for shareholders, this cooperative model eliminates profit margins, aiming for commissions roughly 20% lower than commercial equivalents. The model combines professional services with volunteer contributions to maintain affordability, supporting socio-economic rebalancing and the "long tail" of independent actors.


Origin 🔵 Wikimedia Foundation / Cooperative models
Status Prototype 1 - In testing

Most people who sell a service through a commercial platform discover, sometimes with surprise, how much of the price never reaches them. The problem is structural: closed platforms have shareholders to satisfy, so fees tend to grow opaquely to generate profit. The Double Commission aims to take the opposite path: a cooperative approach operating strictly at real cost.

The core principle: At real cost, without profit

The fundamental concept behind the Double Commission is the "real cost" economy, inspired by housing cooperatives (like those under the Swiss Federal Office for Housing) and mutual insurance cooperatives.

Because WikiDeal has no investors seeking dividends—only users acting as partners—there is no need to generate a profit margin. The commissions are defined transparently based on what is strictly necessary to run the service: accounting audits, daily management, and infrastructure.

This model aims to be approximately 20% cheaper than speculative commercial platforms. For example, in the transport sector where commercial platforms might charge 30%, a cooperative approach could lower this to around 10%. In the housing sector, cooperative rents are typically 20% below speculative market rates.

Combining professionalization and volunteering

To maintain these low real costs, the ecosystem relies on a hybrid model. During the startup phase, and permanently thereafter, the system mixes professional paid work (salaries or mandates) with volunteer contributions.

This is similar to the evolution of the Wikimedia Foundation and its User Groups over 25 years: moving from a single structure to dozens of professionalized entities, but always retaining a strong base of volunteering. Some people might provide paid services, while others volunteer time to support the cooperative itself. The cursor between volunteerism and professionalization adjusts dynamically, but the primary indicator remains constant: keeping real costs low and affordable.

How the Double Commission works

Every transaction on WikiDeal would carry two transparent commissions:

  • The WikiDeal platform fee: sustains the common technical and governance infrastructure.
  • The User Group fee: supports the local or thematic community handling the exchange (organization, welcoming newcomers, support).

Both are charged strictly at cost and shown openly.

Flexible packages and internal competition

Commissions are not fixed, universal percentages. They are flexibilized based on user choices and the specific policies of different User Groups.

For instance, a User Group might offer a commission package that includes mandatory cancellation insurance or high-level support, while another might offer a lower commission with no insurance and less support. For recurring transactions (like a long-term rental extension or regular transport), the effort required from the platform drops, and the commission could drop proportionally.

This creates healthy internal competition: User Groups will propose different definitions of "real cost" and different service packages, allowing users to make conscious choices.

Socio-economic rebalancing (The Long Tail)

By operating at real cost, the Double Commission does more than just lower prices. It is a tool for socio-economic rebalancing.

In today's speculative economy, transaction after transaction, a fraction of the value is siphoned off to a tiny minority—the 1% who own the majority of global wealth (as highlighted by UN inequality reports). By eliminating this extractive profit, value stays within the "long tail" of independent actors and local communities. The goal is not to aggressively crush competitors like multinational tech monopolies do, but to inclusively gather all the actors of the long tail into a fair-trade framework.

Keeping costs low also acts as a powerful support mechanism for families in socio-economic fragility. Much like institutional social programs (such as the Bolsa Família in Brazil, where reports show most beneficiaries use the aid for an average of 3 years before exiting poverty), the WikiDeal cooperative model aims to provide temporary, community-driven economic relief that helps people get back on their feet.

Philosophical vision: Taking back the economy

Ultimately, the Double Commission is tied to WikiDeal's Founding Question. It represents a philosophical shift: users taking the economy back into their own hands to manage it better.

It proves that a global marketplace can be owned, run, and sustained by its users, at real cost, turning an extractive economy into a mutualist one.


See also: All innovations · R&D Portal