Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Calls:Cashout-Policy: Difference between revisions
Rename Open Call to Open Calls; remove reputation credits (Theo 2026-08-03) |
Terminology: use official 'cash-out' instead of 'restitution' (Rewards mechanism) |
||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
# '''100%''' of subscription money covers the cash-out of Rewards: considered unlikely, because of the dilemma between repaying the commitments first and fragilizing the operating costs; | # '''100%''' of subscription money covers the cash-out of Rewards: considered unlikely, because of the dilemma between repaying the commitments first and fragilizing the operating costs; | ||
# '''a fixed percentage''', estimated at 50%; | # '''a fixed percentage''', estimated at 50%; | ||
# '''a degressive percentage''', starting at 100% and progressively decreasing to 1% as holders receive their | # '''a degressive percentage''', starting at 100% and progressively decreasing to 1% as holders receive their cash-out. | ||
For the donors of the first million, the commitment is that the percentage stays between 50% and 100%, that is, at least 50% on average over Prototype 1 (this commitment does not cover early supporters, for whom terms may change in order to preserve liquidity). | For the donors of the first million, the commitment is that the percentage stays between 50% and 100%, that is, at least 50% on average over Prototype 1 (this commitment does not cover early supporters, for whom terms may change in order to preserve liquidity). | ||