Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Cashout-Mechanism: Difference between revisions
Rename Open Call to Open Calls; remove reputation credits (Theo 2026-08-03) |
Terminology: use official term 'cash-out' instead of 'restitution' (Rewards mechanism) |
||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
# '''100%''': all subscription money goes to covering the cash-out of Rewards. This option is considered unlikely, because it raises a dilemma: repaying the commitments first, at the risk of fragilizing the operating costs of the platform (operating costs do exist). | # '''100%''': all subscription money goes to covering the cash-out of Rewards. This option is considered unlikely, because it raises a dilemma: repaying the commitments first, at the risk of fragilizing the operating costs of the platform (operating costs do exist). | ||
# '''A fixed percentage''', estimated at 50%. | # '''A fixed percentage''', estimated at 50%. | ||
# '''A degressive percentage''': it would start at 100% and progressively decrease to 1% as holders receive their | # '''A degressive percentage''': it would start at 100% and progressively decrease to 1% as holders receive their cash-out, so the cash-out goes slower and slower over time. | ||
For the '''donors of the first million''', the commitment is that the percentage stays '''between 50% and 100%''', that is, '''at least 50% on average''' over Prototype 1. This commitment does not cover early supporters: for them, the terms may change in order to preserve some liquidity, so that the system keeps working. | For the '''donors of the first million''', the commitment is that the percentage stays '''between 50% and 100%''', that is, '''at least 50% on average''' over Prototype 1. This commitment does not cover early supporters: for them, the terms may change in order to preserve some liquidity, so that the system keeps working. | ||