Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Reverse Abuse: Difference between revisions
Add Category:Innovation |
Rename Open Call to Open Calls; remove reputation credits (Theo 2026-08-03) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{KidsIntro|Some big companies use clever legal tricks to keep more money and pay less back to the people who actually make things. Reverse Abuse is a WikiDeal idea: use those same legal tricks (but in reverse) so that small producers and farmers keep the money themselves instead.}} | {{KidsIntro|Some big companies use clever legal tricks to keep more money and pay less back to the people who actually make things. Reverse Abuse is a WikiDeal idea: use those same legal tricks (but in reverse) so that small producers and farmers keep the money themselves instead.}} | ||
<div style="background:#eef6ff;border:1px solid #4a90d9;border-left:4px solid #2a6db0;border-radius:4px;padding:9px 14px;margin:10px 0;font-size:0.9rem;">📣 <b>Preview of an Open Call (theoretical).</b> This programme previews a future [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open- | <div style="background:#eef6ff;border:1px solid #4a90d9;border-left:4px solid #2a6db0;border-radius:4px;padding:9px 14px;margin:10px 0;font-size:0.9rem;">📣 <b>Preview of an Open Call (theoretical).</b> This programme previews a future [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Calls:Reverse Abuse|Open Call for legal financial-optimization ideas]], part of a wider family of <b>Open Calls for programmes</b> (and for markets) that combine production, transformation and transport contracts. It is a <b>transition measure</b>, prospective only: <b>no deadline for now</b>, no guarantee of implementation. The Discussion tab is already open for suggestions.</div> | ||
== Reverse Abuse == | == Reverse Abuse == | ||
| Line 118: | Line 118: | ||
* '''Not tax fraud''': optimization uses available legal provisions; no false declarations or hidden transactions | * '''Not tax fraud''': optimization uses available legal provisions; no false declarations or hidden transactions | ||
The programme is proposed as an R&D hypothesis for study, legal review, and community validation through [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open- | The programme is proposed as an R&D hypothesis for study, legal review, and community validation through [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Calls:Main|Open Calls]]. No operational structure is established or implied by this page. | ||
=== Status and Next Steps === | === Status and Next Steps === | ||
| Line 126: | Line 126: | ||
# Legal review by volunteer or partner lawyers (via [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Peer Endorsement|Peer Endorsement]]) | # Legal review by volunteer or partner lawyers (via [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Peer Endorsement|Peer Endorsement]]) | ||
# Identification of pilot supply chains suitable for a proof of concept | # Identification of pilot supply chains suitable for a proof of concept | ||
# Structured [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open- | # Structured [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Calls:Main|Open Call]] for economists, cooperative legal experts, and supply-chain specialists | ||
# Contract drafting within the WikiDeal [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Collaborative Contract Editing|Collaborative Contract Editing]] framework | # Contract drafting within the WikiDeal [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Collaborative Contract Editing|Collaborative Contract Editing]] framework | ||