Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Financing-Development: Difference between revisions
Terminology: Cash Reward(s) → Reward(s) (Théo 2026-07-03) |
Furizon C1/C3/C4 per Theo (audios 2026-07-16 23:04): 100M Rewards (no billion face value), 25/25/50 pro rata per franc, pricing reconciliation, English cleanup |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| '''1M CHF (initial)''' | | '''1M CHF (initial)''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | Rewards issued | ||
| '''50M | | '''50M Rewards (×100 → ×30 curve)''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Early supporters | | Early supporters | ||
| '''50M | | '''50M Rewards''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Total pool | | Total pool | ||
| '''100M | | '''100M Rewards''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Recurring revenue | | Recurring revenue | ||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Distribution | | Distribution | ||
| '''50 | | '''25% donors · 25% early supporters · 50% operating costs''' | ||
|} | |} | ||
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
The initial development phase is funded through the [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Bonding Curve|Bonding Curve]]. The target is to raise '''1 million CHF''' from early supporters: | The initial development phase is funded through the [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Bonding Curve|Bonding Curve]]. The target is to raise '''1 million CHF''' from early supporters: | ||
1M CHF raised → 50M | 1M CHF raised → 50M Rewards issued (×100 → ×30 bonding curve) to funders | ||
+ 50M | + 50M Rewards reserved for early supporters (dev contributors, community builders) | ||
= 100M | = 100M Rewards in total | ||
The total pool is 100 million Rewards, and nothing more: it is not a cash liability. Rewards are automatically transformed into subscriptions, honoured progressively at the pace of subscription revenue. | |||
=== Subscription Revenue as Development Fund === | === Subscription Revenue as Development Fund === | ||
| Line 58: | Line 56: | ||
! Users | ! Users | ||
! Annual Revenue | ! Annual Revenue | ||
! | ! Operating and development budget (50% of revenue) | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 100,000 | | 100,000 | ||
| Line 80: | Line 78: | ||
The initial 1M CHF raised through the bonding curve must be "amortized" over time — meaning early supporters must eventually be compensated. This happens through the revenue distribution mechanism, not through direct repayment: | The initial 1M CHF raised through the bonding curve must be "amortized" over time — meaning early supporters must eventually be compensated. This happens through the revenue distribution mechanism, not through direct repayment: | ||
* Early supporters hold | * Early supporters hold Rewards (from the 100M Rewards pool) | ||
* As platform revenues grow, | * As platform revenues grow, 25% of each incoming franc is distributed to their Rewards, pro rata | ||
* The more | * The more Rewards you hold, the more you receive from each distribution | ||
* Over time, credit holders recoup their funding multiple times over (via the ×100 → ×30 bonding curve) | * Over time, credit holders recoup their funding multiple times over (via the ×100 → ×30 bonding curve) | ||
ℹ️ There is no fixed repayment schedule. Compensation depends on platform growth. Early supporters accept this risk explicitly — the ×100 → ×30 bonding curve is the reward for accepting early-stage uncertainty. | ℹ️ There is no fixed repayment schedule. Compensation depends on platform growth. Early supporters accept this risk explicitly — the ×100 → ×30 bonding curve is the reward for accepting early-stage uncertainty. | ||
=== | === How each incoming franc is distributed === | ||
Each franc of revenue, whether it comes from a CHF 10 yearly subscription or from a CHF 1 monthly payment, is intended to be distributed as follows: | |||
* '''25%''' to the Rewards of the '''donors''' of the first Donation Roundtable, pro rata to the Rewards each donor holds; | |||
* '''25%''' to the Rewards of the '''early supporters''', pro rata on the same principle; | |||
* '''50%''' to the '''current operating costs''' of WikiDeal. | |||
This mechanism is not discretionary: it is a structural rule built into the WikiDeal operating model, published transparently and auditable by the community. | |||
=== Worked example (illustrative, non-binding) === | |||
Assume a month with CHF 100,000 of subscription revenue: | |||
* ' | * CHF 25,000 goes to the Roundtable-1 donors' Rewards: a donor holding 1% of the donors' Rewards pool receives CHF 250 that month; | ||
* | * CHF 25,000 goes to the early supporters' Rewards, pro rata on the same principle; | ||
* CHF 50,000 covers WikiDeal's current operating costs. | |||
Each distributed franc reduces the holder's remaining Rewards balance by the same amount. The pace therefore scales with subscription revenue: the more users subscribe, the faster Rewards are honoured. Cash out is available in increments of at least CHF 100. These figures are an illustration of the mechanism, not a projection or a commitment. | |||
=== Development Roadmap Funding === | === Development Roadmap Funding === | ||
Development priorities are funded from operating | Development priorities are funded from the operating share (50% of revenue). The model does not promise specific features at specific dates; instead, it promises that: | ||
* All surplus beyond operating costs is reinvested in development or distributed to the community | * All surplus beyond operating costs is reinvested in development or distributed to the community | ||
Revision as of 01:14, 17 July 2026
💡 In simple words: This page tells how WikiDeal pays for building new things.
Financing Development
WikiDeal's development is financed without venture capital, without debt, and without shareholder equity. Instead, it uses a self-financing model built on early supporter rewards (bonding curve) and recurring subscription revenue. This page explains how development is funded, what the money covers, and how early supporters are compensated once the platform reaches scale.
WikiDeal finances development through community support (bonding curve ×100 → ×30) + subscriptions (10 CHF/year) — no VC, no debt, no equity dilution
Development Financing
| Target raise | 1M CHF (initial) |
| Rewards issued | 50M Rewards (×100 → ×30 curve) |
| Early supporters | 50M Rewards |
| Total pool | 100M Rewards |
| Recurring revenue | 10 CHF/user/year |
| At 2M users | 20M CHF/year |
| Distribution | 25% donors · 25% early supporters · 50% operating costs |
Self-Financing Model
WikiDeal rejects the traditional startup financing model (raise VC → grow at all costs → exit). Instead, it uses two complementary mechanisms:
- Early-phase: Bonding Curve (×100 → ×30 reward range) → generates initial capital from community supporters
- Operating phase: Subscription revenue (10 CHF/year × users) → self-sustaining operations + development budget
This model means WikiDeal's fate is tied to genuine user adoption, not funder appetite. If users don't pay, development stops. If users do pay, development accelerates proportionally. This creates a healthy alignment between product quality and financial health.
Bonding Curve: 1M CHF → 100M Credits
The initial development phase is funded through the Bonding Curve. The target is to raise 1 million CHF from early supporters:
1M CHF raised → 50M Rewards issued (×100 → ×30 bonding curve) to funders + 50M Rewards reserved for early supporters (dev contributors, community builders) = 100M Rewards in total
The total pool is 100 million Rewards, and nothing more: it is not a cash liability. Rewards are automatically transformed into subscriptions, honoured progressively at the pace of subscription revenue.
Subscription Revenue as Development Fund
Ongoing development is funded through platform subscription revenue (10 CHF/user/year). This creates a direct link between user growth and development capacity:
| Users | Annual Revenue | Operating and development budget (50% of revenue) |
|---|---|---|
| 100,000 | 1M CHF | ~500K CHF |
| 500,000 | 5M CHF | ~2.5M CHF |
| 2,000,000 | 20M CHF | ~10M CHF |
| 10,000,000 | 100M CHF | ~50M CHF |
Amortization Logic
The initial 1M CHF raised through the bonding curve must be "amortized" over time — meaning early supporters must eventually be compensated. This happens through the revenue distribution mechanism, not through direct repayment:
- Early supporters hold Rewards (from the 100M Rewards pool)
- As platform revenues grow, 25% of each incoming franc is distributed to their Rewards, pro rata
- The more Rewards you hold, the more you receive from each distribution
- Over time, credit holders recoup their funding multiple times over (via the ×100 → ×30 bonding curve)
ℹ️ There is no fixed repayment schedule. Compensation depends on platform growth. Early supporters accept this risk explicitly — the ×100 → ×30 bonding curve is the reward for accepting early-stage uncertainty.
How each incoming franc is distributed
Each franc of revenue, whether it comes from a CHF 10 yearly subscription or from a CHF 1 monthly payment, is intended to be distributed as follows:
- 25% to the Rewards of the donors of the first Donation Roundtable, pro rata to the Rewards each donor holds;
- 25% to the Rewards of the early supporters, pro rata on the same principle;
- 50% to the current operating costs of WikiDeal.
This mechanism is not discretionary: it is a structural rule built into the WikiDeal operating model, published transparently and auditable by the community.
Worked example (illustrative, non-binding)
Assume a month with CHF 100,000 of subscription revenue:
- CHF 25,000 goes to the Roundtable-1 donors' Rewards: a donor holding 1% of the donors' Rewards pool receives CHF 250 that month;
- CHF 25,000 goes to the early supporters' Rewards, pro rata on the same principle;
- CHF 50,000 covers WikiDeal's current operating costs.
Each distributed franc reduces the holder's remaining Rewards balance by the same amount. The pace therefore scales with subscription revenue: the more users subscribe, the faster Rewards are honoured. Cash out is available in increments of at least CHF 100. These figures are an illustration of the mechanism, not a projection or a commitment.
Development Roadmap Funding
Development priorities are funded from the operating share (50% of revenue). The model does not promise specific features at specific dates; instead, it promises that:
- All surplus beyond operating costs is reinvested in development or distributed to the community
- Development priorities are determined through democratic governance (Open Call process)
- No development budget is "reserved" for private interests or locked away from community oversight
- Financial reports are published quarterly, including development spending breakdown
See also: Bonding Curve Subscription Model Revenue Structure Rewards Explained Reward Simulation