Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Annual Value Increase: Difference between revisions
Enrich: multiplier more relevant than added percentage, prudent bond analogy (Theo point 15) |
Base hypothesis section: goal is to demonstrate its relevance; cost implication for the yearly subscription, counterpart global services (Theo audio 2026-07-15) |
||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
* It is not decided whether it would be implemented at all. | * It is not decided whether it would be implemented at all. | ||
* No percentage is defined. Figures mentioned in earlier drafts were only illustrations and are withdrawn. | * No percentage is defined. Figures mentioned in earlier drafts were only illustrations and are withdrawn. | ||
<span id="base-hypothesis"></span> | |||
== The base hypothesis and its cost == | |||
A possible annual percentage increase on rewards is under study through this draft Open Call (not yet launched); no percentage is decided. This is the '''base hypothesis''' of the call, and the goal of the call is to demonstrate, or invalidate, its relevance. | |||
If it were adopted, it would also mean an increase in the cost of the platform: typically, in ten years, the yearly subscription would be significantly higher than today. The counterpart is that this subscription is linked to global services that aim at letting users avoid separate legal advice for their commercial dealings, which is an important part of its value. | |||
<span id="multiplier"></span> | <span id="multiplier"></span> | ||