Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Annual Value Increase: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 02:11, 3 July 2026

💡 In simple words: Maybe one day, Credits could slowly grow in value each year, a little like a savings jar. But this is not decided yet: it is one of the money questions the team still has to study while building the first prototype.

Annual Value Increase (open question)

Economic question, WikiDeal R&D · to be studied during Prototype 1

Origin	🟢 WikiDeal concept
Status	Open question, not decided, not yet implemented
Scope	To be addressed during the realization of Prototype 1

What is it?

One recurring question from WikiDeal funders is: "what do I get back?" One idea under discussion is that the value of subscriptions / Credits could increase slightly each year.

This is only a proposal, not a confirmed feature. At this stage:

We do not know whether it will be implemented at all.
We do not know the exact percentage if it were.
The figure of 5% is only a hypothetical maximum cap: the real value would be x%, with 5% as the ceiling of the proposal.

It was originally imagined as an attractive mechanism, but in practice it is too complex to implement on Prototype 1. It therefore becomes one of the economic questions to be examined during the prototype's development, not a commitment made in advance.

If it were implemented

Should the team decide to adopt it after study, the principle would be:

An increase in the value of subscriptions, calculated pro-rata from the launch of the project.
A progressive yearly increase of x%, with 5% as the maximum cap hypothesis (not a guaranteed rate).

The aim would be a stable, predictable anchor rather than speculative volatility. It can be understood as the equivalent of a stablecoin, since it would be anchored to the Swiss franc, a particularly stable reference currency.

Why this framing

This page intentionally avoids presenting the increase as a fixed contractual promise. It is an open economic question that will be debated and decided during Prototype 1, with the percentage and the very principle still to be confirmed.

See also: All innovations · R&D Portal

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-{{KidsIntro|Maybe one day, Credits could slowly grow in value each year — a little like a savings jar. But this is not decided yet: it is one of the money questions the team still has to study while building the first prototype.}}
+{{KidsIntro|Maybe one day, Credits could slowly grow in value each year, a little like a savings jar. But this is not decided yet: it is one of the money questions the team still has to study while building the first prototype.}}
 == Annual Value Increase (open question) ==
-''Economic question — WikiDeal R&D · to be studied during Prototype 1''
+''Economic question, WikiDeal R&D · to be studied during Prototype 1''
 {| class="wikitable"
 |-
-| Origin || 🟢 Théo Bondolfi
+| Origin || 🟢 WikiDeal concept
 |-
-| Status || '''Open question — not decided, not yet implemented'''
+| Status || '''Open question, not decided, not yet implemented'''
 |-
 | Scope || To be addressed during the realization of Prototype 1
@@ Line 20: / Line 20: @@
 * We do '''not''' know '''whether''' it will be implemented at all.
 * We do '''not''' know the exact '''percentage''' if it were.
-* The figure of '''5% is only a hypothetical maximum cap''' — the real value would be ''x%'', with 5% as the ceiling of the proposal.
+* The figure of '''5% is only a hypothetical maximum cap''': the real value would be ''x%'', with 5% as the ceiling of the proposal.
 It was originally imagined as an attractive mechanism, but in practice it is '''too complex to implement on Prototype 1'''. It therefore becomes one of the economic questions to be examined ''during'' the prototype's development, not a commitment made in advance.
@@ Line 30: / Line 30: @@
 * A '''progressive yearly increase of x%''', with '''5% as the maximum cap hypothesis''' (not a guaranteed rate).
-The aim would be a '''stable, predictable anchor''' rather than speculative volatility. It can be understood as the '''equivalent of a stablecoin''', since it would be anchored to the Swiss franc — a particularly stable reference currency.
+The aim would be a '''stable, predictable anchor''' rather than speculative volatility. It can be understood as the '''equivalent of a stablecoin''', since it would be anchored to the Swiss franc, a particularly stable reference currency.
 === Why this framing ===