Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Participative Agreement Design: Difference between revisions
Visible in-content table of contents (Theo 2026-08-15) |
ExpertIntro recalibrated to the 55-75 word target (synthesis of existing page content, no new facts) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{KidsIntro|On WikiDeal, everyone can help design fair deals. People suggest ideas, discuss them and improve them together, and lawyers check the results. Agreements are built by many hands, like a Wikipedia article, instead of being written by one company alone.}} | {{KidsIntro|On WikiDeal, everyone can help design fair deals. People suggest ideas, discuss them and improve them together, and lawyers check the results. Agreements are built by many hands, like a Wikipedia article, instead of being written by one company alone.}} | ||
{{ExpertIntro|Initial hypothesis, foundational innovation number one: participative agreement design. The innovation is not the technical fact of running two platforms; it is the participative design of agreements and of the whole contributive ecosystem | {{ExpertIntro|Initial hypothesis, foundational innovation number one: participative agreement design. The innovation is not the technical fact of running two platforms; it is the participative design of agreements and of the whole contributive ecosystem around them: compensatory measures, amendments, use cases, legal references, alerts and quality criteria, all intended to be endorsed by lawyers. The underlying wager: non-experts can contribute usefully to the design of agreements. The double platform remains the supporting technical architecture.}} | ||
'''On this page:''' | '''On this page:''' | ||
* [[#what-is-it|What is it?]] | * [[#what-is-it|What is it?]] | ||