Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Participative Agreement Design: Difference between revisions
Rewrite: the innovation is Participative Agreement Design (agreements plus their contributive ecosystem, endorsed by lawyers); double platform kept as technical element; add State of the art chapter (decision Theo 2026-08-15) |
Visible in-content table of contents (Theo 2026-08-15) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{KidsIntro|On WikiDeal, everyone can help design fair deals. People suggest ideas, discuss them and improve them together, and lawyers check the results. Agreements are built by many hands, like a Wikipedia article, instead of being written by one company alone.}} | {{KidsIntro|On WikiDeal, everyone can help design fair deals. People suggest ideas, discuss them and improve them together, and lawyers check the results. Agreements are built by many hands, like a Wikipedia article, instead of being written by one company alone.}} | ||
{{ExpertIntro|Initial hypothesis, foundational innovation number one: participative agreement design. The innovation is not the technical fact of running two platforms; it is the participative design of agreements and of the whole contributive ecosystem built around them: compensatory measures, amendments, concrete use cases, legal references, common errors, alerts, expected-results models and quality criteria, all intended to be endorsed by lawyers. The underlying wager: non-experts can contribute usefully to the design of agreements. The double platform (contract models endorsed by lawyers, smartphone applications built on those models) remains as the supporting technical architecture.}} | {{ExpertIntro|Initial hypothesis, foundational innovation number one: participative agreement design. The innovation is not the technical fact of running two platforms; it is the participative design of agreements and of the whole contributive ecosystem built around them: compensatory measures, amendments, concrete use cases, legal references, common errors, alerts, expected-results models and quality criteria, all intended to be endorsed by lawyers. The underlying wager: non-experts can contribute usefully to the design of agreements. The double platform (contract models endorsed by lawyers, smartphone applications built on those models) remains as the supporting technical architecture.}} | ||
'''On this page:''' | |||
* [[#what-is-it|What is it?]] | |||
* [[#contributive-ecosystem|Not only contracts: a whole contributive ecosystem]] | |||
* [[#participative-contributions|Participative contributions and debates]] | |||
* [[#the-wager|The wager: non-experts can contribute]] | |||
* [[#double-platform|Technical element: the double platform]] | |||
* [[#state-of-the-art|State of the art]] | |||
* [[#status|Status]] | |||
__NOTOC__ | |||
= Participative Agreement Design = | = Participative Agreement Design = | ||