Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Calls:Reputation-Rewards: Difference between revisions
Refine tone and structure per Theo |
Cas 6 (Patrick Furrer): explicit justification line linking the 2026-08-03 removal of reputation credits to this wave 2 study call |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
WikiDeal aims at keeping its core concepts simple, so "reputation rewards" are deliberately not part of the current model. This wave 2 call is intended to study whether, and how, reputation-based rewards could complement existing tools at a later stage, notably [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Karma-Tokens|Karma tokens]] and reputation scores. | WikiDeal aims at keeping its core concepts simple, so "reputation rewards" are deliberately not part of the current model. This wave 2 call is intended to study whether, and how, reputation-based rewards could complement existing tools at a later stage, notably [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Karma-Tokens|Karma tokens]] and reputation scores. | ||
This framing follows a dated decision: on 3 August 2026, "reputation credits" were removed from the [[Gov/en/Portal:Meta/Prototype-1-Deliverables|Prototype 1 Deliverables]] annex, and the concept was moved to this wave 2 study call instead. The removal there and the study here are two sides of the same decision: not adopted in the current model, and examined openly before any future adoption. | |||
An illustrative use case: a long-standing member who reliably delivers on contracts might, under such a scheme, receive some recognition beyond her reputation score. Whether that recognition should exist, and what form it could take, is exactly what the study would examine. | An illustrative use case: a long-standing member who reliably delivers on contracts might, under such a scheme, receive some recognition beyond her reputation score. Whether that recognition should exist, and what form it could take, is exactly what the study would examine. | ||