Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Annual Value Increase: Difference between revisions
m Protected "Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Annual Value Increase": Bulk protection: Gov pages = administrators only (Theo 2026-06-20) ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite)) |
Attribution convention 2026-07-02: name moved to Credits page; attribution now 'WikiDeal concept'/'WikiDeal founder' with credits link; em-dash cleanup |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{KidsIntro|Maybe one day, Credits could slowly grow in value each year | {{KidsIntro|Maybe one day, Credits could slowly grow in value each year, a little like a savings jar. But this is not decided yet: it is one of the money questions the team still has to study while building the first prototype.}} | ||
== Annual Value Increase (open question) == | == Annual Value Increase (open question) == | ||
''Economic question | ''Economic question, WikiDeal R&D · to be studied during Prototype 1'' | ||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Origin || 🟢 | | Origin || 🟢 WikiDeal concept | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Status || '''Open question | | Status || '''Open question, not decided, not yet implemented''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Scope || To be addressed during the realization of Prototype 1 | | Scope || To be addressed during the realization of Prototype 1 | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
* We do '''not''' know '''whether''' it will be implemented at all. | * We do '''not''' know '''whether''' it will be implemented at all. | ||
* We do '''not''' know the exact '''percentage''' if it were. | * We do '''not''' know the exact '''percentage''' if it were. | ||
* The figure of '''5% is only a hypothetical maximum cap''' | * The figure of '''5% is only a hypothetical maximum cap''': the real value would be ''x%'', with 5% as the ceiling of the proposal. | ||
It was originally imagined as an attractive mechanism, but in practice it is '''too complex to implement on Prototype 1'''. It therefore becomes one of the economic questions to be examined ''during'' the prototype's development, not a commitment made in advance. | It was originally imagined as an attractive mechanism, but in practice it is '''too complex to implement on Prototype 1'''. It therefore becomes one of the economic questions to be examined ''during'' the prototype's development, not a commitment made in advance. | ||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
* A '''progressive yearly increase of x%''', with '''5% as the maximum cap hypothesis''' (not a guaranteed rate). | * A '''progressive yearly increase of x%''', with '''5% as the maximum cap hypothesis''' (not a guaranteed rate). | ||
The aim would be a '''stable, predictable anchor''' rather than speculative volatility. It can be understood as the '''equivalent of a stablecoin''', since it would be anchored to the Swiss franc | The aim would be a '''stable, predictable anchor''' rather than speculative volatility. It can be understood as the '''equivalent of a stablecoin''', since it would be anchored to the Swiss franc, a particularly stable reference currency. | ||
=== Why this framing === | === Why this framing === | ||