Jump to content
Gov  ·  Market  ·  Community  ·  Policies  ·  Funding  ·  Open Calls  ·  Get started

Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Peer Endorsement: Difference between revisions

Shorten intros per Theo's 20s rule
Visible in-content table of contents (Theo 2026-08-15)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
{{ExpertIntro|Initial hypothesis for contract validation: endorsement would be the recognition of a template by lawyers who take named responsibility and are prepared to defend it, inspired by Wikipedia's peer review. Anyone could contribute; all templates stay freely accessible with a maturity mention. Only endorsed contracts are intended to deploy in the apps; others remain usable at the user's own risk.}}
{{ExpertIntro|Initial hypothesis for contract validation: endorsement would be the recognition of a template by lawyers who take named responsibility and are prepared to defend it, inspired by Wikipedia's peer review. Anyone could contribute; all templates stay freely accessible with a maturity mention. Only endorsed contracts are intended to deploy in the apps; others remain usable at the user's own risk.}}


__TOC__
'''On this page:'''
* [[#what-is-it|What is it?]]
* [[#how-it-works|How it works on WikiDeal]]
* [[#endorsed-vs-goodwill|Endorsed contracts and all other templates]]
* [[#see-also|See also]]
* [[#state-of-the-art|State of the art]]
__NOTOC__


= Peer Endorsement =
= Peer Endorsement =
Line 38: Line 44:
* '''All other templates''' would remain available on a goodwill basis. They would generally be much better than contracts invented from scratch by amateurs: a template drafted collectively and refined through feedback tends to be better than one written by a single person, and an imperfect contract is better than no contract at all. They would however be used at the user's own risk, without a guarantee of full legal alignment or of the absence of loopholes. And even when a text itself has no loophole, gaps often appear in the way it is applied.
* '''All other templates''' would remain available on a goodwill basis. They would generally be much better than contracts invented from scratch by amateurs: a template drafted collectively and refined through feedback tends to be better than one written by a single person, and an imperfect contract is better than no contract at all. They would however be used at the user's own risk, without a guarantee of full legal alignment or of the absence of loopholes. And even when a text itself has no loophole, gaps often appear in the way it is applied.


<span id="see-also"></span>
== See also ==
== See also ==
<span id="state-of-the-art"></span>
== State of the art ==
Lawyer endorsement of contract models relates to research on information asymmetry, signalling, reputation and the transformation of legal services. These references inform the hypothesis; they do not validate it.
* George A. Akerlof (1970), ''The Market for "Lemons": Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism'', Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3): [https://doi.org/10.2307/1879431 doi:10.2307/1879431] · [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Market_for_Lemons article page on Wikipedia].
* Michael Spence (1973), ''Job Market Signaling'', Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3): [https://doi.org/10.2307/1882010 doi:10.2307/1882010] · [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Signalling_(economics) signalling on Wikipedia].
* Paul Resnick, Ko Kuwabara, Richard Zeckhauser and Eric Friedman (2000), ''Reputation systems'', Communications of the ACM, 43(12): [https://doi.org/10.1145/355112.355122 doi:10.1145/355112.355122] · [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reputation_system reputation system on Wikipedia].
* Richard Susskind (2008), ''The End of Lawyers? Rethinking the Nature of Legal Services'', Oxford University Press: [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Susskind author page on Wikipedia].
* Gillian K. Hadfield (2017), ''Rules for a Flat World: Why Humans Invented Law and How to Reinvent It for a Complex Global Economy'', Oxford University Press: [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gillian_Hadfield author page on Wikipedia].


'''See also:''' [[Gov/en/Portal:Institutions/Validation-Endorsement|Validation and Endorsement]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Collaborative Contract Editing|Collaborative Contract Editing]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Subscription|The Subscription Model]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Main|All innovations]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Main|R&D Portal]]
'''See also:''' [[Gov/en/Portal:Institutions/Validation-Endorsement|Validation and Endorsement]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Collaborative Contract Editing|Collaborative Contract Editing]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Subscription|The Subscription Model]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Main|All innovations]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Main|R&D Portal]]