Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Calls:Commissions: Difference between revisions
Update Chair, Facilitator budgets/hours, and refine Evaluator pillars (free licensing, cooperative economy, direct democracy) |
Founder decision: attendance fees only for commission work incl. report production, none for Council/Committee meetings; link to base page |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
The strategic supervision of the Open Calls is ensured by the Steering Committee and the Foundation Council of the Ynternet.org Foundation. Their role in this context is strictly limited to strategic analysis and deployment oversight, not operational implementation. | The strategic supervision of the Open Calls is ensured by the Steering Committee and the Foundation Council of the Ynternet.org Foundation. Their role in this context is strictly limited to strategic analysis and deployment oversight, not operational implementation. | ||
For their participation | These strategic supervision sessions count as commission work, distinct from Council or Committee meetings, which carry no attendance fees. For their participation, the members of the Steering Committee and the Foundation Council may receive modest attendance fees (''jetons de présence''), but only when they do more than supervising and evaluating reports: attendance fees reward taking part in the production of the reports and analyses. The overall framework is described on the [[Gov/en/Portal:Institutions/Steering-Committee|Steering Committee]] page. | ||
The Chair of an Open Call commission also receives modest attendance fees for their responsibilities, slightly higher than standard members to reflect the workload of framing the call and driving consensus. | The Chair of an Open Call commission also receives modest attendance fees for their responsibilities, slightly higher than standard members to reflect the workload of framing the call and driving consensus. | ||
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
=== During the Call === | === During the Call === | ||
The commission meets at predefined dates to evaluate proposals. During the entire duration of the call, the Chair and the Facilitator (and optionally the other members) conduct a minimum of one check-in (''pointage'') every 15 days to monitor progress and discussions. | The commission meets at predefined dates to evaluate proposals. When evaluating submissions, the commission is required to use the '''Open Call CDIEM Framework''' as much as possible to ensure structured, fair, and transparent assessments. | ||
During the entire duration of the call, the Chair and the Facilitator (and optionally the other members) conduct a minimum of one check-in (''pointage'') every 15 days to monitor progress and discussions. | |||
=== Post-Funding Follow-up === | === Post-Funding Follow-up === | ||
| Line 50: | Line 52: | ||
* If the idea was not implemented, or if it was countered or replaced by better approaches, the remaining funds may be distributed to other beneficiaries, or a mix of the original and new contributors. | * If the idea was not implemented, or if it was countered or replaced by better approaches, the remaining funds may be distributed to other beneficiaries, or a mix of the original and new contributors. | ||
'''See also:''' [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Calls:Main|Open Call Main]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Calls:FAQ|Open Call FAQ]] | '''See also:''' [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Calls:Main|Open Call Main]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Calls:FAQ|Open Call FAQ]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:Institutions/Steering-Committee|Steering Committee and supervision structure]] (overall supervision structure reference page) | ||
[[Category:Innovation]] | [[Category:Innovation]] | ||
[[Category:Open Calls]] | |||