Jump to content
Gov  ·  Market  ·  Community  ·  Policies  ·  Funding  ·  Open Calls  ·  Get started

Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Subscription: Difference between revisions

Furizon C1/C4 follow-up (Theo audios 2026-07-16): annual rate = 12 months at reduced price, CHF 2 (~17%) discount stated explicitly; average CHF 10/user/year assumption; remove billion-scale extrapolations, scalability table aligned on CHF 10/year average
Category cleanup: remove Category:Migration June 2026 (founder order 2026-09-03)
 
(8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{KidsIntro|A subscription means you pay a small amount every month to use the platform, instead of paying a big fee each time. It is like a monthly pass. The price is only meant to cover what the platform really costs to run: nobody is supposed to make a profit on it, and the money is shared to keep the community strong.}}
{{KidsIntro|A subscription means paying a small amount every month to use the platform, instead of a big fee each time, like a monthly pass. The price only covers what the platform really costs: nobody makes a profit.}}


{{ExpertIntro|Initial hypothesis for the WikiDeal revenue engine: a CHF 1/month (or CHF 10/year) subscription, billed at transaction time, intended to run the platform at real costs, with no profit for any third-party company. Subscribers would also be members, with voting rights and a path to co-ownership. Subscription revenue would first cover the Rewards owed to Early Supporters, operating costs (servers, coordination team, committee) and the awards of the Open Calls. Subscriptions could also be offered (solidarity gift, supported request, third-party payment). The page also explains why the term "subscription" was preferred over "membership".}}
{{ExpertIntro|Initial hypothesis for WikiDeal's revenue engine: a CHF 1/month subscription billed at transaction time, intended to run the platform at real cost with no third-party profit. Subscribers would also be members with voting rights and a path to co-ownership. Revenue would first cover Rewards, operating costs and open-call awards. Subscriptions could also be offered.}}


__TOC__
{{ArticleSummary|
* [[#governance-costs|Governance costs, no profit]]
* [[#at-a-glance|Subscription model at a glance]]
* [[#benefits-and-commitments|What you gain and our commitments]]
* [[#pricing|Pricing structure]]
* [[#offered-subscriptions|Offered subscriptions]]
* [[#access-rules|Access rules and billing at transaction time]]
* [[#where-the-money-goes|Where the money goes]]
* [[#scalability|Scalability (illustrative, non-binding)]]
* [[#revenue-and-supporters|Subscription revenue and supporters]]
* [[#naming|Why "subscription" and not "membership"]]
* [[#see-also|See also]]
* [[#state-of-the-art|State of the art]]
}}
__NOTOC__


= The Subscription Model =
= The Subscription Model =
Line 9: Line 23:
''Wiki Core · Concept. This page presents an initial hypothesis, proposed as a basis for discussion.''
''Wiki Core · Concept. This page presents an initial hypothesis, proposed as a basis for discussion.''


<span id="real-costs"></span>
<span id="governance-costs"></span>
== Real costs, no profit ==
== Governance costs, no profit ==


The first argument for the paid subscription is simple: it aims at guaranteeing that the platform runs at '''real costs, with no profit for a third-party company'''. What subscribers pay is intended to cover what the platform actually costs to operate, nothing more.
The first argument for the paid subscription is simple: it aims at guaranteeing that the platform runs without profit for a third-party company. Rather than an absolute "real cost" which is difficult to define globally, the subscription funds a policy of priority management for good governance: keeping the community stimulated, paying resource persons, answering fundamental questions, supporting whistleblowers, and improving the model.


This is intended to be the exact opposite of the model of large speculative platforms, whose business logic is sometimes compared to offering the first dose for free, then overcharging users once a dependence has been created. Here, users would pay a small, transparent price from the start, the price would stay aligned with real costs, and users would never be the product.
This is intended to be the exact opposite of the model of large speculative platforms, whose business logic is sometimes compared to offering the first dose for free, then overcharging users once a dependence has been created. Here, users would pay a small, transparent price from the start, the price would stay aligned with real governance needs, and users would never be the product.


<span id="at-a-glance"></span>
<span id="at-a-glance"></span>
Line 28: Line 42:
|-
|-
| Annual increase
| Annual increase
| Under discussion, up to 5%/year (initial working hypothesis, draft [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Call:Progressive-Subscription-Increase|Open Call]])
| Under discussion, up to 5%/year (initial working hypothesis, draft [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Calls:Progressive-Subscription-Increase|Open Call]])
|-
|-
| Billing method
| Billing method
Line 50: Line 64:
CHF 1/month is not intended as a price for a service: it would work as a subscription to a community-governed commons. Every franc is intended to go back to the community.
CHF 1/month is not intended as a price for a service: it would work as a subscription to a community-governed commons. Every franc is intended to go back to the community.


<span id="why-subscribe"></span>
<span id="benefits-and-commitments"></span>
== Why subscribe: the main arguments ==
== What you gain and our commitments ==


The arguments proposed in favour of the paid subscription, in order of importance:
To put it from the user's perspective, the subscription is designed around concrete benefits and systemic commitments. These arguments would be presented clearly to users when they create an account and subscribe.


# '''Real costs, no profit for a third-party company.''' This is the number one argument: the subscription aims at guaranteeing a platform run at cost, not for the benefit of shareholders.
=== Your direct benefits ===
# '''Co-ownership guarantee.''' Subscribing is intended to guarantee the possibility of becoming a co-owner of the platform.
* '''The AI Assistant (Chatbot):''' The subscription is intended to include, as soon as possible, access to an AI assistant (text and audio). It would take users by the hand, help them formulate their needs, find the right contracts, and navigate the platform safely, saving precious time.
# '''Commissions at real cost.''' Transaction [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Commissions|commissions]] are intended to be set at real cost, without profit.
* '''Voting rights and governance participation:''' Subscribing is intended to guarantee the possibility of becoming a co-owner of the platform, with a voice in its decisions.
# '''Support for vulnerable people.''' The platform intends to provide incentives and levers for people in vulnerable or fragile situations.
* '''Marketplaces at cost price:''' Use of every marketplace would be charged based on the principle of real cost. While the exact definition of "real cost" depends on each [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:User Groups|User Group's]] policy (what is paid in CHF, what is exchanged in [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Karma-Tokens|Karma tokens]], what relies on volunteering), the platform guarantees the principle: no extractive profit.
# '''Fair access to dispute management and to developments.''' Every subscriber would have equitable access to [[Gov/en/Portal:Justice/Main|dispute resolution]] and to the developments of the platform.
* '''Fair access to dispute management:''' Every subscriber would have equitable access to dispute resolution and to the developments of the platform.


<span id="what-you-get"></span>
=== Our systemic commitments ===
== What the subscription gives access to ==
* '''All contract templates are free to read:''' They could be copied and pasted freely under a [[Gov/en/Portal:Legal/Free-Licensing|free license]]. Only signing a contract under the aegis of WikiDeal would require an active subscription.
 
* '''Honest revenues only:''' People working for the platform would receive salaries at standard market rates. There would never be extreme bonuses, and no possibility of reselling the company.
The subscription is intended to give access to:
* '''Support for vulnerable people:''' The platform intends to provide incentives and levers for people in vulnerable or fragile situations.
 
* '''All contract templates.''' They could be copied and pasted freely, because they are intended to be published under a [[Gov/en/Portal:Legal/Free-Licensing|free license]]. Anyone could contribute to these templates, and all of them would remain freely accessible, each with a mention of its degree of maturity. Only the contracts endorsed by lawyers who take named responsibility for them are intended to be deployed in the smartphone applications and used in contracts signed under the aegis of WikiDeal; the other templates would remain usable on a goodwill basis, at the user's own risk. The endorsement process is explained at [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Peer Endorsement|Peer Endorsement]].
* '''All the marketplaces at cost price.''' Use of every marketplace would be charged at real cost, with no profit for the [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:User Groups|User Groups]] operating them.
* '''Honest revenues only.''' People working for the platform would receive salaries at standard market rates. There would never be extreme bonuses, and no possibility of reselling shares or the company itself, since the operating entities are intended to be non-profit. Nobody would ever be able to capture a large share of the benefits, unlike the extreme bonus and equity practices seen at some large commercial platforms.


<span id="pricing"></span>
<span id="pricing"></span>
Line 75: Line 85:
* '''Monthly:''' CHF 1.00 per month
* '''Monthly:''' CHF 1.00 per month
* '''Annual:''' CHF 10.00 per year. Written in black and white: the annual rate covers 12 months at a reduced price. Paying a year in advance costs CHF 10 instead of the CHF 12 that 12 monthly payments of CHF 1 would total, a discount of CHF 2 (about 17%) for early annual payment. In practice, many scenarios could coexist: some users would cancel or suspend their subscription, some would add donations on top, some would obtain months of subscription in exchange for Karma tokens earned through contributions, and advantages for contributions are being considered. On average, the working assumption is therefore CHF 10 per user per year. New users would be encouraged from the start to take the annual subscription; the monthly option at CHF 1 is intended for cautious people who prefer to start small.
* '''Annual:''' CHF 10.00 per year. Written in black and white: the annual rate covers 12 months at a reduced price. Paying a year in advance costs CHF 10 instead of the CHF 12 that 12 monthly payments of CHF 1 would total, a discount of CHF 2 (about 17%) for early annual payment. In practice, many scenarios could coexist: some users would cancel or suspend their subscription, some would add donations on top, some would obtain months of subscription in exchange for Karma tokens earned through contributions, and advantages for contributions are being considered. On average, the working assumption is therefore CHF 10 per user per year. New users would be encouraged from the start to take the annual subscription; the monthly option at CHF 1 is intended for cautious people who prefer to start small.
* '''Annual value increase:''' a possible annual increase of the subscription amount, of up to 5% per year, is under discussion as an initial working hypothesis through a draft [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Call:Progressive-Subscription-Increase|Open Call]] (not yet launched); no percentage is decided. A related but distinct question, a possible annual percentage increase on rewards, is under study at [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Annual Value Increase|Annual Value Increase]].
* '''Annual value increase:''' a possible annual increase of the subscription amount, of up to 5% per year, is under discussion as an initial working hypothesis through a draft [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Calls:Progressive-Subscription-Increase|Open Call]] (not yet launched); no percentage is decided. A related but distinct question, a possible annual percentage increase on rewards, is under study at [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Annual Value Increase|Annual Value Increase]].


=== Why CHF 1/month? ===
=== Why CHF 1/month? ===
Line 91: Line 101:
The subscription is designed so that it can also be offered, not only bought for oneself. Three options are envisaged, proposed as a base for discussion:
The subscription is designed so that it can also be offered, not only bought for oneself. Three options are envisaged, proposed as a base for discussion:


# '''Solidarity gift:''' people with sufficient income could offer subscriptions to others.
# '''Solidarity gift (1+1):''' people with sufficient income could offer subscriptions to others. A user could choose to "buy one for me, and offer one to someone who needs it" (as a one-time gift or a recurring donation).
# '''Supported request:''' a person could fill in a request form to benefit from an offered subscription, mentioning in their profile how they engage in the community, for example as a volunteer.
# '''Supported request:''' a person could fill in a request form to benefit from an offered subscription, mentioning in their profile how they engage in the community, for example as a volunteer.
# '''Third-party payment:''' the subscription could be paid by a third party, for example an association that engages volunteers and offers them the subscription.
# '''Third-party payment:''' the subscription could be paid by a third party, for example an association that engages volunteers and offers them the subscription.
Line 122: Line 132:
# '''Rewards for the Early Supporters''' who believed in the project by supporting it at its riskiest stage. These [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Rewards|Rewards]] are tied to the deliverables of the first funding round: see [[Gov/en/Portal:Meta/Prototype-1-Deliverables|Prototype 1 Deliverables]].
# '''Rewards for the Early Supporters''' who believed in the project by supporting it at its riskiest stage. These [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Rewards|Rewards]] are tied to the deliverables of the first funding round: see [[Gov/en/Portal:Meta/Prototype-1-Deliverables|Prototype 1 Deliverables]].
# '''Operating costs:''' servers, the coordination team and the committee.
# '''Operating costs:''' servers, the coordination team and the committee.
# '''Awards (prizes) for the [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Call:Main|Open Calls]].''' A note on terminology: on WikiDeal, "rewards" designates the compensation of supporters under the funding model, while "awards" designates the prizes of the Open Calls. The two words are deliberately kept distinct.
# '''Awards (prizes) for the [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Calls:Main|Open Calls]].''' A note on terminology: on WikiDeal, "rewards" designates the compensation of supporters under the funding model, while "awards" designates the prizes of the Open Calls. The two words are deliberately kept distinct.


<span id="startup-transition"></span>
<span id="startup-transition"></span>
Line 166: Line 176:
As an initial hypothesis, the term "subscription" was preferred over "membership", while recognizing that what is proposed is, in reality, a subscription for a membership: subscribers would also be members, with voting rights. As this naming choice sits at the heart of the system, it is explained in detail at [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Subscription-or-Membership|Subscription or Membership]].
As an initial hypothesis, the term "subscription" was preferred over "membership", while recognizing that what is proposed is, in reality, a subscription for a membership: subscribers would also be members, with voting rights. As this naming choice sits at the heart of the system, it is explained in detail at [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Subscription-or-Membership|Subscription or Membership]].


<span id="see-also"></span>
== See also ==
== See also ==
<span id="state-of-the-art"></span>
== State of the art ==
Solidarity-priced membership relates to research on participative pricing, the psychology of payment and the economics of free and low-cost offers. The studies below inform the CHF 1/month hypothesis.
* Ayelet Gneezy, Uri Gneezy, Leif D. Nelson and Amber Brown (2010), ''Shared Social Responsibility: A Field Experiment in Pay-What-You-Want Pricing and Charitable Giving'', Science, 329(5989): [https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1186744 doi:10.1126/science.1186744].
* Ju-Young Kim, Martin Natter and Martin Spann (2009), ''Pay What You Want: A New Participative Pricing Mechanism'', Journal of Marketing, 73(1): [https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.73.1.44 doi:10.1509/jmkg.73.1.44] · [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pay_what_you_want pay what you want on Wikipedia].
* Drazen Prelec and George Loewenstein (1998), ''The Red and the Black: Mental Accounting of Savings and Debt'', Marketing Science, 17(1): [https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.17.1.4 doi:10.1287/mksc.17.1.4].
* Chris Anderson (2009), ''Free: The Future of a Radical Price'', Hyperion: [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free:_The_Future_of_a_Radical_Price book page on Wikipedia] · [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freemium freemium on Wikipedia].
* On recurring-revenue models in general: [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subscription_business_model subscription business model on Wikipedia].


'''See also:''' [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Subscription-or-Membership|Subscription or Membership]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Rewards|Rewards]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Main|Why Fund WikiDeal]] · Fund WikiDeal · Funding Contract · [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Need-Driven Funding|Need-Driven Funding]]
'''See also:''' [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Subscription-or-Membership|Subscription or Membership]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Rewards|Rewards]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Main|Why Fund WikiDeal]] · Fund WikiDeal · Funding Contract · [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Need-Driven Funding|Need-Driven Funding]]


💡 '''Improve this concept:''' submit a proposal via [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Call:Main|Open Call]]
💡 '''Improve this concept:''' submit a proposal via [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Calls:Main|Open Call]]
[[Category:Migration June 2026]]
[[Category:Innovation]]
<!-- visible -->
<!-- visible -->