Gov/en/Portal:Meta/Internal-AI: Difference between revisions
Attribution convention 2026-07-02: name moved to Credits page; attribution now 'WikiDeal concept'/'WikiDeal founder' with credits link; em-dash cleanup |
Category cleanup: remove Category:Migration June 2026 (founder order 2026-09-03) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ExpertIntro|We are heading towards mandatory AI disclosure regimes in governance platforms. This hypothesis proposes that transparent logging of AI contributions—including tools, prompts, and human modifications—reduces cognitive biases in collective decision-making while enabling empirical study of AI's role in cooperative governance. The emerging trend suggests community-driven verification models can maintain compliance without centralised gatekeeping.}} | |||
{{KidsIntro|this page explains how WikiDeal uses smart computer helpers (AI) to do its work, and the rules that keep them honest and safe.}} | {{KidsIntro|this page explains how WikiDeal uses smart computer helpers (AI) to do its work, and the rules that keep them honest and safe.}} | ||
| Line 5: | Line 7: | ||
== AI Transparency == | == AI Transparency == | ||
WikiDeal operates under a '''mandatory AI transparency rule''': any content, proposal, code, or analysis submitted to WikiDeal, whether to the wiki, to an [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open- | WikiDeal operates under a '''mandatory AI transparency rule''': any content, proposal, code, or analysis submitted to WikiDeal, whether to the wiki, to an [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Calls:Main|Open Call]] competition, or to a governance vote, must disclose whether AI tools were used in its creation, and if so, which tools and what prompts were provided. | ||
=== The Prompt Disclosure Requirement === | === The Prompt Disclosure Requirement === | ||
| Line 23: | Line 25: | ||
The WikiDeal founder has noted that mandatory AI disclosure has a secondary benefit: it reduces the "my idea is better" dynamic that can paralyse open communities. When every proposal comes with a clear record of its intellectual ingredients (human insight, AI drafting, empirical data sources), it becomes easier to evaluate proposals on their merits rather than on their authors' prestige. The proposal that synthesises AI assistance with genuine human experience and wisdom stands on its own, regardless of who submitted it. | The WikiDeal founder has noted that mandatory AI disclosure has a secondary benefit: it reduces the "my idea is better" dynamic that can paralyse open communities. When every proposal comes with a clear record of its intellectual ingredients (human insight, AI drafting, empirical data sources), it becomes easier to evaluate proposals on their merits rather than on their authors' prestige. The proposal that synthesises AI assistance with genuine human experience and wisdom stands on its own, regardless of who submitted it. | ||
'''See also:''' | '''See also:''' [[Gov/en/Portal:Meta/AI-Assisted-Questions|Asking questions with AI (neutralization, pearls and trends)]] | ||
[[ | |||
<!-- visible --> | <!-- visible --> | ||