Jump to content
Gov  ·  Market  ·  Community  ·  Policies  ·  Funding  ·  Open Calls  ·  Get started

Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Calls:Rating-Balance-Processes: Difference between revisions

Category cleanup: remove Category:Migration June 2026 (founder order 2026-09-03)
Terminology: Rewards -> Subscription Tokens
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{KidsIntro|We are looking for ideas on how to build the rules that keep ratings and comments fair for everyone.}}
{{KidsIntro|We are looking for ideas on how to build the rules that keep ratings and comments fair for everyone.}}
{{ExpertIntro|This Wave 2 Open Call seeks proposals for structuring the Rating Balance processes. We need concrete models, algorithms, and governance structures to implement incentivized comments, early reviewer rewards, user education, and penalties for artificial positivity or systematic ignorance, ensuring that ratings remain honest, calibrated, and diversified.}}
{{ExpertIntro|This Wave 2 Open Call seeks proposals for structuring the Rating Balance processes. We need concrete models, algorithms, and governance structures to implement incentivized comments, early reviewer subscription tokens, user education, and penalties for artificial positivity or systematic ignorance, ensuring that ratings remain honest, calibrated, and diversified.}}


{| class="infobox" style="float: right; clear: right; margin: 0 0 1em 1em; width: 300px; font-size: 90%; background: #f9f9f9; border: 1px solid #aaa; padding: 0.2em;"
{| class="infobox" style="float: right; clear: right; margin: 0 0 1em 1em; width: 300px; font-size: 90%; background: #f9f9f9; border: 1px solid #aaa; padding: 0.2em;"
Line 34: Line 34:
Proposals should cover the implementation of the Rating Balance mechanisms:
Proposals should cover the implementation of the Rating Balance mechanisms:
* '''Algorithm Calibration:''' How should extreme patterns (systematic 1-star or 5-star scores) be weighted based on a rater's track record?
* '''Algorithm Calibration:''' How should extreme patterns (systematic 1-star or 5-star scores) be weighted based on a rater's track record?
* '''Incentivizing Comments:''' Models for offering non-monetary rewards (Karma tokens, extra nights, privileges) that genuinely stimulate detailed reviews without compromising honesty.
* '''Incentivizing Comments:''' Models for offering non-monetary subscription tokens (Karma tokens, extra nights, privileges) that genuinely stimulate detailed reviews without compromising honesty.
* '''User Education & Moderation:''' Tools and interface concepts to teach users how to leave constructive, precise comments without wasting time.
* '''User Education & Moderation:''' Tools and interface concepts to teach users how to leave constructive, precise comments without wasting time.
* '''Early Reviewer Strategies:''' How to identify, reward, and protect the "early adopters" who take the time to comment on brand new services or providers.
* '''Early Reviewer Strategies:''' How to identify, subscription token, and protect the "early adopters" who take the time to comment on brand new services or providers.
* '''The Comments "Tax":''' Defining the penalty mechanisms for users who frequently ignore comments requests or who exclusively leave un-nuanced positive comments.
* '''The Comments "Tax":''' Defining the penalty mechanisms for users who frequently ignore comments requests or who exclusively leave un-nuanced positive comments.