Jump to content
Gov  ·  Market  ·  Community  ·  Policies  ·  Funding  ·  Open Calls  ·  Get started

Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Bonding Curve: Difference between revisions

From WikiDeal
Publish migrated content (visible in Recent changes)
Move funding cluster to dedicated Category:Funding hub — per Théo 2026-08-18
 
(20 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{KidsIntro|Think of the very first people who chip in to build something new they take the biggest chance, so they get the best reward. The Bonding Curve is the clear, public math rule that gives early supporters more Credits per franc, with no guessing and no secret deals.}}
{{KidsIntro|Think of the very first people who chip in to build something new: they take the biggest chance, so they get the best reward. The Bonding Curve is the clear, public math rule that gives early supporters more Rewards per franc, with no guessing and no secret deals.}}
 
{{ExpertIntro|The Bonding Curve is a transparent algorithm intended to convert funding support into Rewards: the earlier the support, the higher the multiplier (up to ×100, around ×30 at mid-stage). It is non-speculative, publicly documented, and revisable prospectively through Open Calls with mathematical experts.}}
{{NotApproved}}
 
Wiki Core · Concept
 
== The Bonding Curve ==
 
Bonding Curve at a Glance


{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
Line 15: Line 8:
|-
|-
| Purpose
| Purpose
| Credit generation from funding
| Reward generation from funding
|-
|-
| Speculation
| Speculation
| ❌ None
| ❌ None
|-
|-
| Backed by
| Covered by
| Real expenses + subscriptions
| Real expenses + subscriptions
|-
|-
| Expert review
| Expert review
| [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Call:Main|Open Call]]s (math experts)
| [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Calls:Main|Open Call]]s (math experts)
|-
|-
| Early multiplier
| Early multiplier
Line 33: Line 26:
|-
|-
| See also
| See also
| [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Cash-Rewards|Rewards Explained]]
| [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Rewards|Rewards Explained]]
|-
|-
| See also
| See also
Line 39: Line 32:
|}
|}


The bonding curve is the core algorithm that converts funding contributions into Credits. It is a '''transparent, defined algorithm''' — not immutable (it can be updated through [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Call:Main|Open Calls]] with mathematical experts), but consistent and publicly documented. It ensures that early funders are rewarded for taking on the highest risk.
Every new platform faces the same bootstrapping question: why would anyone support a project before it has proven itself? The first supporters carry the most uncertainty, so fairness suggests they should receive the most in return. The Bonding Curve is WikiDeal's answer: a public, verifiable formula that anyone can check, designed so that trust comes from transparency rather than from promises.
 
The bonding curve ensures early funders receive more Credits per CHF — recognizing the risk they take when the platform is unproven.
 
=== How the Bonding Curve Works ===


The bonding curve relates the current funding reserve level to the Credits generated per CHF contributed. The key principle: '''as the reserve grows, each CHF generates fewer Credits'''. This rewards early participants and creates a natural, non-speculative incentive to fund early.
{{ArticleSummary|
* [[#how-it-works|How the Bonding Curve is intended to work]]
* [[#formula|The mathematical formula]]
* [[#visualization|Text-based visualization]]
* [[#why-a-bonding-curve|Why a bonding curve?]]
* [[#roles|Who does what]]
* [[#relation|Relation to Rewards and Karma tokens]]
* [[#transparency|Transparency commitment]]
* [[#state-of-the-art|State of the art]]
}}
__NOTOC__


=== The Mathematical Formula ===
<span id="how-it-works"></span>
== How the Bonding Curve is intended to work ==
The bonding curve relates the current funding reserve level to the Rewards generated per CHF of support. The key principle: '''as the reserve grows, each CHF generates fewer Rewards'''. This recognizes early participants and creates a natural, non-speculative incentive to support early.


Credits(CHF) = CHF × multiplier(R) Where multiplier(R) is a decreasing function of Reserve R: multiplier(R) = M_max × e^(-k × R) M_max = maximum multiplier (at R=0, e.g. ×100) k = decay constant (determines how fast multiplier drops) R = current reserve level (total CHF in fund) e = Euler's number (≈ 2.718...) Example at R=0 (first funder): CHF 1 → 100 Credits Example at R=50,000 CHF (mid-stage): CHF 1 → ~30 Credits Example at R=500,000 CHF (growth stage): CHF 1 → ~5–8 Credits
For a supporter, the experience is simple: Anna supports with CHF 100 when the reserve is nearly empty and would receive far more Rewards per franc than Ben, who supports the same amount a year later when the platform is established. Both can verify their calculation themselves, because the formula is public.


⚠️ This calculation will be discussed in Open Calls by mathematical experts. The exact constants (M_max, k) are subject to community review and may be adjusted through the Open Call process.
<span id="formula"></span>
== The mathematical formula ==
Rewards(CHF) = CHF × multiplier(R) where multiplier(R) is a decreasing function of Reserve R: multiplier(R) = M_max × e^(-k × R). M_max = maximum multiplier (at R=0, e.g. ×100); k = decay constant (determines how fast the multiplier drops); R = current reserve level (total CHF in fund); e = [[wikipedia:E_(mathematical_constant)|Euler's number]] (≈ 2.718...). Example at R=0 (first supporter): CHF 1 → 100 Rewards. Example at R=50,000 CHF (mid-stage): CHF 1 → ~30 Rewards. Example at R=500,000 CHF (growth stage): CHF 1 → ~5 to 8 Rewards.


=== Text-Based Visualization ===
⚠️ This calculation is intended to be discussed in Open Calls by mathematical experts. The exact constants (M_max, k) are subject to community review and may be adjusted through the Open Calls process. Updates would apply prospectively only: they would never reduce rights already attributed at the moment of a support.


<span id="visualization"></span>
== Text-based visualization ==
The relationship between reserve and multiplier (illustrative):
The relationship between reserve and multiplier (illustrative):


Reserve (CHF) │ Multiplier (Credits per CHF) ───────────────┼────────────────────────────── 0 │ ×100 ██████████████████████████ 5,000 │ ×80 ████████████████████ 20,000 │ ×50 █████████████ 50,000 │ ×30 ████████ 100,000 │ ×15 ████ 300,000 │ ×6 ██ 500,000+ │ ×2–5 █
Reserve (CHF) │ Multiplier (Rewards per CHF) ───────────────┼────────────────────────────── 0 │ ×100 ██████████████████████████ 5,000 │ ×80 ████████████████████ 20,000 │ ×50 █████████████ 50,000 │ ×30 ████████ 100,000 │ ×15 ████ 300,000 │ ×6 ██ 500,000+ │ ×2–5 █


=== Why a Bonding Curve? ===
<span id="why-a-bonding-curve"></span>
== Why a bonding curve? ==
The bonding curve addresses a fundamental bootstrapping problem: how to reward early supporters fairly without creating speculation or securities-law issues.


The bonding curve solves a fundamental bootstrapping problem: how do you reward early funders fairly without creating speculation or securities law issues?
* '''Early supporters take the highest risk''' (platform unproven) → highest multiplier
* '''Later supporters take less risk''' (platform established) → lower multiplier
* No external market price needed: the algorithm is self-contained
* No speculation: Rewards are not tradeable on open markets
* Transparent: everyone can see the curve and calculate their Rewards


* '''Early funders take the highest risk''' (platform unproven) → receive highest multiplier
<span id="roles"></span>
* '''Later funders take less risk''' (platform established) → receive lower multiplier
== Who does what ==
* No external market price needed — the algorithm is self-contained
* '''Supporters''' choose when and how much to support, and can verify their Rewards independently.
* No speculation: Credits are not tradeable on open markets
* '''Mathematical experts''' review the constants through [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Calls:Main|Open Calls]].
* Transparent: everyone can see the curve and calculate their Credits
* '''The community''' oversees any change to the formula, which keeps governance in citizens' hands rather than in a closed boardroom.


=== Relation to [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Cash-Rewards|Cash Rewards]] and [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Miles-Credits|Miles Credits]] ===
<span id="relation"></span>
== Relation to Rewards and Karma tokens ==
The bonding curve determines the ''total'' [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Rewards|Rewards]] generated. The [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Need-Driven-Funding|Need-Driven Funding]] mechanism and the donor's own choice at donation time then determine how many of those Rewards the donor keeps and how much is left to the project as pure support (see the [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Rewards-FAQ|Rewards FAQ]] for the formulas currently proposed). [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Karma-Tokens|Karma tokens]] are a separate, non-convertible form of Rewards, documented on their own page; the bonding curve does not determine them.


The bonding curve determines the ''total'' Credits generated. The [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Funding Stabilizer|Balance Boost]] then determines how those Credits are split between [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Cash-Rewards|Cash Rewards]] (personal, P2) and the community pool. The bonding curve itself does not determine the Cash/Miles ratio — that is the Boost's job.
<span id="transparency"></span>
== Transparency commitment ==
WikiDeal intends to publish the full bonding curve formula, constants, and historical data. Community members would be able to verify their Reward calculations independently. The formula is defined, not opaque, and any change would go through an Open Call process with mathematical expert review. This reflects WikiDeal's broader aims of transparency, lower cost, flexibility and citizen participation.


=== Transparency Commitment ===
<span id="state-of-the-art"></span>
== State of the art ==
Algorithmic pricing curves and threshold-based collective funding have been studied in several strands of research. The works below provide scientific context for the bonding curve hypothesis; they do not guarantee its outcome.


WikiDeal commits to publishing the full bonding curve formula, constants, and historical data. Community members can verify their Credit calculations independently. The formula is defined — not opaque — and any changes must go through an Open Call process with mathematical expert review.
* Michael Zargham, Jamsheed Shorish and Krzysztof Paruch (2019), ''From Curved Bonding to Configuration Spaces'', WU Vienna University of Economics and Business, Working Paper Series: [https://epub.wu.ac.at/7385/ open access paper].
* Jiahua Xu, Krzysztof Paruch, Simon Cousaert and Yebo Feng (2023), ''SoK: Decentralized Exchanges (DEX) with Automated Market Maker (AMM) Protocols'', ACM Computing Surveys, 55(11): [https://doi.org/10.1145/3570639 doi:10.1145/3570639] · [{W}Automated_market_maker automated market maker on Wikipedia].
* Robin Hanson (2003), ''Combinatorial Information Market Design'', Information Systems Frontiers, 5(1): [https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022058209073 doi:10.1023/A:1022058209073] · [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prediction_market prediction market on Wikipedia].
* Paul Belleflamme, Thomas Lambert and Armin Schwienbacher (2014), ''Crowdfunding: Tapping the right crowd'', Journal of Business Venturing, 29(5): [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.07.003 doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.07.003] · [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crowdfunding crowdfunding on Wikipedia].
* Ethan Mollick (2014), ''The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study'', Journal of Business Venturing, 29(1): [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.06.005 doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.06.005].


'''See also:''' [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Cash-Rewards|Rewards Explained]] [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Cash-Rewards|Cash Rewards]] [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Miles-Credits|Miles Credits]] [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Funding Stabilizer|Balance Boost]] [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Main|Why Fund WikiDeal]] [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Call:Main|Open Call Guide]]
'''See also:''' [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Rewards|Rewards Explained]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Rewards-FAQ|Rewards FAQ]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Need-Driven-Funding|Need-Driven Funding]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Revenue-Structure|Revenue Structure]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Karma-Tokens|Karma tokens]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Main|Why Fund WikiDeal]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Calls:Main|Open Call Guide]]


💡 '''Improve this concept''' submit a proposal via [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Call:Main|Open Call]]
💡 '''Improve this concept''': submit a proposal via [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Calls:Main|Open Call]]
[[Category:Funding]]
[[Category:Migration June 2026]]
[[Category:Migration June 2026]]
[[Category:Innovation]]

Latest revision as of 00:38, 19 August 2026

💡 In simple words: Think of the very first people who chip in to build something new: they take the biggest chance, so they get the best reward. The Bonding Curve is the clear, public math rule that gives early supporters more Rewards per franc, with no guessing and no secret deals.

🎯 In 20 seconds (scientific summary): The Bonding Curve is a transparent algorithm intended to convert funding support into Rewards: the earlier the support, the higher the multiplier (up to ×100, around ×30 at mid-stage). It is non-speculative, publicly documented, and revisable prospectively through Open Calls with mathematical experts.


Type Transparent algorithm
Purpose Reward generation from funding
Speculation ❌ None
Covered by Real expenses + subscriptions
Expert review Open Calls (math experts)
Early multiplier Up to ×100
Growth multiplier ~×30 at mid-stage
See also Rewards Explained
See also Why Fund WikiDeal

Every new platform faces the same bootstrapping question: why would anyone support a project before it has proven itself? The first supporters carry the most uncertainty, so fairness suggests they should receive the most in return. The Bonding Curve is WikiDeal's answer: a public, verifiable formula that anyone can check, designed so that trust comes from transparency rather than from promises.


How the Bonding Curve is intended to work

The bonding curve relates the current funding reserve level to the Rewards generated per CHF of support. The key principle: as the reserve grows, each CHF generates fewer Rewards. This recognizes early participants and creates a natural, non-speculative incentive to support early.

For a supporter, the experience is simple: Anna supports with CHF 100 when the reserve is nearly empty and would receive far more Rewards per franc than Ben, who supports the same amount a year later when the platform is established. Both can verify their calculation themselves, because the formula is public.

The mathematical formula

Rewards(CHF) = CHF × multiplier(R) where multiplier(R) is a decreasing function of Reserve R: multiplier(R) = M_max × e^(-k × R). M_max = maximum multiplier (at R=0, e.g. ×100); k = decay constant (determines how fast the multiplier drops); R = current reserve level (total CHF in fund); e = Euler's number (≈ 2.718...). Example at R=0 (first supporter): CHF 1 → 100 Rewards. Example at R=50,000 CHF (mid-stage): CHF 1 → ~30 Rewards. Example at R=500,000 CHF (growth stage): CHF 1 → ~5 to 8 Rewards.

⚠️ This calculation is intended to be discussed in Open Calls by mathematical experts. The exact constants (M_max, k) are subject to community review and may be adjusted through the Open Calls process. Updates would apply prospectively only: they would never reduce rights already attributed at the moment of a support.

Text-based visualization

The relationship between reserve and multiplier (illustrative):

Reserve (CHF) │ Multiplier (Rewards per CHF) ───────────────┼────────────────────────────── 0 │ ×100 ██████████████████████████ 5,000 │ ×80 ████████████████████ 20,000 │ ×50 █████████████ 50,000 │ ×30 ████████ 100,000 │ ×15 ████ 300,000 │ ×6 ██ 500,000+ │ ×2–5 █

Why a bonding curve?

The bonding curve addresses a fundamental bootstrapping problem: how to reward early supporters fairly without creating speculation or securities-law issues.

  • Early supporters take the highest risk (platform unproven) → highest multiplier
  • Later supporters take less risk (platform established) → lower multiplier
  • No external market price needed: the algorithm is self-contained
  • No speculation: Rewards are not tradeable on open markets
  • Transparent: everyone can see the curve and calculate their Rewards

Who does what

  • Supporters choose when and how much to support, and can verify their Rewards independently.
  • Mathematical experts review the constants through Open Calls.
  • The community oversees any change to the formula, which keeps governance in citizens' hands rather than in a closed boardroom.

Relation to Rewards and Karma tokens

The bonding curve determines the total Rewards generated. The Need-Driven Funding mechanism and the donor's own choice at donation time then determine how many of those Rewards the donor keeps and how much is left to the project as pure support (see the Rewards FAQ for the formulas currently proposed). Karma tokens are a separate, non-convertible form of Rewards, documented on their own page; the bonding curve does not determine them.

Transparency commitment

WikiDeal intends to publish the full bonding curve formula, constants, and historical data. Community members would be able to verify their Reward calculations independently. The formula is defined, not opaque, and any change would go through an Open Call process with mathematical expert review. This reflects WikiDeal's broader aims of transparency, lower cost, flexibility and citizen participation.

State of the art

Algorithmic pricing curves and threshold-based collective funding have been studied in several strands of research. The works below provide scientific context for the bonding curve hypothesis; they do not guarantee its outcome.

  • Michael Zargham, Jamsheed Shorish and Krzysztof Paruch (2019), From Curved Bonding to Configuration Spaces, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business, Working Paper Series: open access paper.
  • Jiahua Xu, Krzysztof Paruch, Simon Cousaert and Yebo Feng (2023), SoK: Decentralized Exchanges (DEX) with Automated Market Maker (AMM) Protocols, ACM Computing Surveys, 55(11): doi:10.1145/3570639 · [{W}Automated_market_maker automated market maker on Wikipedia].
  • Robin Hanson (2003), Combinatorial Information Market Design, Information Systems Frontiers, 5(1): doi:10.1023/A:1022058209073 · prediction market on Wikipedia.
  • Paul Belleflamme, Thomas Lambert and Armin Schwienbacher (2014), Crowdfunding: Tapping the right crowd, Journal of Business Venturing, 29(5): doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.07.003 · crowdfunding on Wikipedia.
  • Ethan Mollick (2014), The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study, Journal of Business Venturing, 29(1): doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.06.005.

See also: Rewards Explained · Rewards FAQ · Need-Driven Funding · Revenue Structure · Karma tokens · Why Fund WikiDeal · Open Call Guide

💡 Improve this concept: submit a proposal via Open Call