Jump to content
Gov  ·  Market  ·  Community  ·  Policies  ·  Funding  ·  Open Call  ·  Get started

Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Main: Difference between revisions

From WikiDeal
← Older editNewer edit →
VisualWikitext
v2 corrections: index of tables, one row per innovation, innovation criteria section, explanations moved to dedicated pages (Theo audio 2026-07-13 11:01)
Update AI Supported Deployment row and intro link to renamed title (spaces, Theo audio 2026-07-12)
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{KidsIntro|WikiDeal has lots of clever, fair ideas built into it, about money, trust, sharing, and solving arguments. This page is the big list where you can find every one of them and read what each does.}}
{{KidsIntro|WikiDeal has lots of clever, fair ideas built into it, about money, trust, sharing, and solving arguments. This page is the big list where you can find every one of them and read what each does.}}
{{ExpertIntro|The innovations listed here are tested and refined step by step, and they interact with one another: what matters is the whole, not any single part. The intent is not to reinvent the wheel, but to assemble existing ideas into a globally functional ensemble. This page is an index: each innovation is one table row with a very short description; the full explanation lives on its dedicated page.}}
__TOC__


= WikiDeal socio-economic innovations =
== WikiDeal Socio-Economic Innovations ==
''Innovations index, WikiDeal R&D. Each innovation is one table row; the full explanation lives on its dedicated page.''
''Innovations index, WikiDeal R&D''


<span id="mix-culture"></span>
This page is the comparative hub for the '''socio-economic innovations''' embedded in the WikiDeal model. Each innovation has a named origin (a foundation, movement, or individual thinker) and combines existing traditions (Wikimedia governance, the cooperative movement, token economics, free software, the Semantic Web) in ways specific to WikiDeal. The list is '''open and unlimited''': the count does not matter, only the innovations do. These are intended as '''citizen-initiated innovations''': ideas stemming from citizen initiative, proposed and refined in the open. The methodology envisaged to move them from idea to prototype and deployment (five work profiles combined with open calls) is described on the [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:AI Supported Deployment|AI Supported Deployment]] page.
== Principles ==


None of the ideas gathered here is a total innovation, and none is zero innovation. Each one is inspired by others: this work belongs to the mix culture, and what becomes interesting is the assembly of the whole. Sometimes an idea is simply better calibrated, better highlighted or better deployed here, or the context is favourable to test it.
'''Origin legend:''' 🔵 Wikimedia Foundation · 🟢 WikiDeal concept ([[Gov/en/Portal:Meta/Licensing-and-Credits|credits]]) · 🟠 Crypto / Token Economics · 🟣 Cooperative Movement · 🔴 Free Software Foundation · 🌐 Tim Berners-Lee / W3C
 
The process is iterative: test, collect feedback through qualitative and quantitative analyses, and improve progressively, learning while doing, keeping a balance between overall coherence and going to the essentials. Some innovations are planned for testing and not yet deployed.
 
The innovations form '''two parts''', both listed on this page to give a global vision: the '''core''', meaning the innovations that concern the WikiDeal ecosystem at large, and the innovations '''specific to the marketplaces'''. The majority of the innovations are expected to appear progressively in the different marketplaces.
 
The list is '''open and unlimited''': the count does not matter, only the innovations do. These are intended as '''citizen-initiated innovations''': ideas stemming from citizen initiative, proposed and refined in the open. The methodology envisaged to move them from idea to prototype and deployment (five work profiles combined with open calls) is described on the [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:AI Supported Deployment|AI Supported Deployment]] page.
 
Two foundational principles carry all the others. '''Innovation number one: a double platform''', contract models '''endorsed by lawyers''' on one side, smartphone applications built on those models on the other; the contracts are intended to be '''fair, balanced and consumer approved''', serving the interests of users and providers, not the interests of third-party structures. '''Innovation number two: the same governance as Wikipedia''', applied to deals and marketplaces instead of encyclopedic knowledge. Both appear as rows in the Foundations table below, with their dedicated pages.
 
<span id="innovation-criteria"></span>
== Innovation criteria ==
 
What qualifies an idea as an innovation worth listing here? The criteria below guide the selection. The first five reflect the current working basis; the last three are additional proposals, offered as a basis for discussion.
 
# '''It answers a real need.''' An innovation is retained because it addresses a concrete problem, not for the pleasure of studying it.
# '''The devil is in the details.''' Sometimes a single detail, better calibrated, makes a large difference in practice.
# '''A new field of application.''' Applying an existing mechanism to a field where it is not common counts as innovation: for example, applying the free licences of the software and knowledge world, such as CC BY-SA, to contracts is not common practice.
# '''Anonymous, privacy-respecting data collection.''' The innovation allows qualitative and quantitative analyses without exposing personal data.
# '''A social and ecological role.''' The innovation contributes to equity of chances and to reducing the weakening of life on Earth, in a context where the United Nations and scientific bodies document the beginning of a mass extinction: see the [https://www.ipbes.net/global-assessment IPBES 2019 Global Assessment], the [https://www.ipcc.ch/assessment-report/ar6/ IPCC Sixth Assessment Report] and the [https://www.un.org/en/climatechange/science/climate-issues/biodiversity United Nations overview on biodiversity and climate].
# '''Reversibility (proposed, basis for discussion).''' An innovation should be testable and measurable, and it should be possible to roll it back without harming the people who tried it.
# '''Transferability (proposed, basis for discussion).''' An innovation should work across countries and legal systems, or at least clearly document the adaptations it needs.
# '''Simplicity of access (proposed, basis for discussion).''' An innovation should be understandable and usable without expert knowledge, so that it does not create a new elite of specialists.
 
<span id="how-to-read"></span>
== How to read this page ==
 
Every innovation appears as one table row, with a link to its dedicated page and a very short description. The origin of each innovation is documented on its own page and in the [[Gov/en/Portal:Meta/Licensing-and-Credits|credits]].
 
Each table also proposes a '''deployment status''' at a given date (here: July 2026), on the following scale: '''under study''' · '''starting''' · '''being deployed''' · '''deployed''' · '''widely deployed'''. The status values are an initial proposal, under review.
 
<span id="foundations"></span>
== Foundations ==


{| class="wikitable sortable"
{| class="wikitable sortable"
! Innovation !! Deployment status (July 2026, proposal) !! Summary
! Innovation !! Origin-inspired summary
|-
|-
| [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Double Platform|Double Platform]] || Starting || Contract models endorsed by lawyers, plus smartphone applications built on them: fair, balanced, consumer approved.
| [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:AI Disclaimer|AI Disclaimer]] || Mandatory transparency marker on every AI-assisted page, requiring disclosure and human validation.
|-
|-
| [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Wikipedia Governance|Wikipedia Governance]] || Starting || The same governance as Wikipedia, applied to deals and marketplaces instead of encyclopedic knowledge.
| [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:AI Supported Deployment|AI Supported Deployment]] || Working hypothesis for the R&D methodology: five AI-era work archetypes (Prototyper, Builder, Sweeper, Grower, Maintainer) combined with Open Calls to move from idea to prototype to deployment.
|-
|-
| [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Collaborative Contract Editing|Collaborative Contract Editing]] || Starting || Contracts drafted participatively on a wiki, organized around common contract bases, then endorsed by lawyers.
| [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Annual Value Increase|Annual Value Increase (draft Open Call)]] || A possible annual percentage increase on rewards, under study through a draft Open Call (not yet launched); no percentage is decided.
|}
 
<span id="ecosystem-at-large"></span>
== WikiDeal ecosystem at large ==
 
The first block, the core, gathers the innovations that concern the whole WikiDeal ecosystem.
 
<span id="governance"></span>
=== Governance ===
 
Marketplace quality is intended to rest on governance mechanisms rather than on a central authority.
 
{| class="wikitable sortable"
! Innovation !! Deployment status (July 2026, proposal) !! Summary
|-
|-
| [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Coopetition|Co-opetition]] || Under study || User groups compete and cooperate at once: quality without destructive rivalry.
| [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Arbitration Chambers|Arbitration Chambers]] || Three-level dispute resolution with Condorcet voting, inspired by Wikimedia's ArbCom.
|-
|-
| [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Peer Endorsement|Peer Endorsement]] || Under study || Lawyers endorse contracts: a named accountable responsibility, with additional paid services in case of adaptation or dispute.
| [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Bonding Curve|Bonding Curve]] || Transparent algorithm converting funding contributions into Credits; early funders get more per CHF.
|-
| [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Rating Balancing Policy|Rating Balancing Policy]] || Under study || Proactive balancing of marketplace ratings, keeping feedback honest, calibrated and diversified.
|-
| [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Incentivized Feedback|Incentivized Feedback]] || Under study || Detailed feedback earns incentives, never money: credits, rights, direct advantages from providers.
|}
 
<span id="funding"></span>
=== Funding ===
 
The funding innovations aim at a donation-based, non-speculative model; the explanations, including all illustrative figures, live on the dedicated pages.
 
{| class="wikitable sortable"
! Innovation !! Deployment status (July 2026, proposal) !! Summary
|-
|-
| [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Bonding Curve|Bonding Curve]] || Under study || Transparent algorithm converting funding contributions into Credits; early funders get more per CHF.
| [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Need-Driven Funding|Need-Driven Funding]] || Auto-regulation adjusting maximum Rewards based on funding vs. incompressible costs.
|-
|-
| [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Need-Driven Funding|Need-Driven Funding]] || Under study || Reward ratio regulation: a second algorithm adjusting rewards to the real needs of the platform.
| [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Collaborative Contract Editing|Collaborative Contract Editing]] || Contracts are wiki-edited, versioned, and community-validated like Wikipedia articles.
|-
|-
| [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Annual Value Increase|Annual Value Increase (draft Open Call)]] || Under study || Possible annual increase on rewards, under study through a draft Open Call; the multiplier is considered more relevant than an added percentage.
| [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Coopetition|Co-opetition]] || User Groups compete and cooperate at once, quality without destructive rivalry.
|-
|-
| [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Double Commission|Double Commission]] || Under study || Two small, transparent fees per transaction: a platform fee and a User Group fee.
| [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Deprivatization|Deprivatization]] || Reclaiming extractive markets as user-governed commons, as Wikipedia did for knowledge.
|-
|-
| [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Deprivatization|Deprivatization]] || Under study || Reclaiming extractive markets as user-governed commons; forms one whole with Exit to Community and Dual Rewards.
| [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Double Commission|Double Commission]] || Two small, transparent fees per transaction: a platform fee and a User Group fee.
|-
|-
| [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Exit To Community|Exit to Community]] || Deployed (written into the contracts) || Progressive transfer of governance, ownership and value to the user community; donation-based, legally non-speculative.
| [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Dual Credits|Dual Rewards]] || Two Credit types: Rewards (CHF-convertible, no guarantee*) and Miles Credits (community).
|-
|-
| [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Dual Credits|Dual Rewards]] || Under study || Two Credit types: Rewards (CHF-convertible, no guarantee) and Miles Credits (functional, targeting unexploited resources).
| [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Exit To Community|Exit to Community]] || Progressive transfer of governance, ownership, and value to the user community.
|-
|-
| [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Time Resource Bank|Time and Resource Bank (Miles Credits)]] || Under study || Exchange of unexploited resources via Miles Credits: not a currency, facilities comparable to discounts.
| [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Judgment Balance|Judgment Balance Indicator]] || Auto-weighting of extreme ratings to keep feedback honest and calibrated.
|-
|-
| [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Subscription|CHF 1/Month Subscription]] || Under study || Solidarity-priced membership; one month of usage = CHF 1 nominal.
| [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Libre Licensing|Systematic Libre Licensing]] || AGPL v3 for software, CC BY-SA 4.0 for content, everywhere, by default.
|-
|-
| [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Subscription-or-Membership|Subscription or Membership]] || Under study || Naming reflection: subscribers would also be members with voting rights; "subscription" chosen as the more inclusive term.
| [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Maturity Score|Use Case Maturity Score]] || Composite per-portal score from seven indicators of marketplace health.
|}
 
<span id="trust-and-security"></span>
=== Trust and security ===
 
Trust and security combine dispute resolution, reconciliation processes and interoperability agreements between user groups.
 
{| class="wikitable sortable"
! Innovation !! Deployment status (July 2026, proposal) !! Summary
|-
|-
| [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Arbitration Chambers|Arbitration Chambers]] || Under study || Three-level dispute resolution with Condorcet voting, inspired by Wikimedia's ArbCom.
| [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Open Calls|Open Calls]] || Seasonal open invitations for community proposals to improve the WikiDeal model.
|-
|-
| [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Truth Reconciliation|Commercial Truth & Reconciliation]] || Under study || Formal process to repair distrust and prevent forks caused by personal conflict.
| [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Paid Feedback|Paid Feedback]] || Users earn Credits for useful feedback (~1 CHF/min); deductions for skipping it.
|-
|-
| [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Rings Of Trust|Rings of Trust]] || Under study || Inter-User-Group agreements enabling Miles Credits interoperability.
| [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Participatory Observatory|Participatory Observatory]] || Internal monitoring of migrations, obsolescence risk, fundraising, and competition.
|}
 
<span id="direct-democracy"></span>
=== Direct democracy and free licensing global governance ===
 
This family combines the Swiss political model ([https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Popular_initiative_in_Switzerland popular initiatives], referendums, collegial decisions at every level) with the culture of free licences: the citizen as legislator, rather than the elected representative. Decision methods are diversified according to what is at stake; for the more complex decisions, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Condorcet_method Condorcet voting] can be used.
 
{| class="wikitable sortable"
! Innovation !! Deployment status (July 2026, proposal) !! Summary
|-
|-
| [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Call:Main|Open Calls]] || Being deployed || Open invitations for community proposals; they make the governance porous and flexible. Waves, awards and status: see the Open Call portal.
| [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Peer Endorsement|Peer Endorsement]] || Volunteer lawyers endorse contracts and take named, accountable responsibility.
|-
|-
| [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Participatory Observatory|Participatory Observatories]] || Under study || Unlimited citizen-run observatories, created by theme by user groups, with Slashdot-style karma moderation.
| [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Revenue Spreading|Revenue Spreading]] || Dialoguers choose 100% payout in year 1 or 20% spread over ten years.
|}
 
<span id="technology"></span>
=== Technology ===
 
{| class="wikitable sortable"
! Innovation !! Deployment status (July 2026, proposal) !! Summary
|-
|-
| [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Libre Licensing|Systematic Libre Licensing]] || Deployed (100 percent since the beginning) || AGPL v3 for software, CC BY-SA 4.0 for content, everywhere, by default: exactly the Free Software Foundation licences, libre in the pure sense.
| [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Reverse Abuse|Reverse Abuse]] || Programme-type mechanism reusing multinationals' legal financial structures to repatriate value to small producers and user-governed supply chains.
|-
|-
| [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Structured Data|Structured Data (Linked Data)]] || Under study || RDF, JSON-LD, and Wikidata integration for semantic interoperability.
| [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Rings Of Trust|Rings of Trust]] || Inter-User-Group agreements enabling Miles Credits interoperability.
|-
|-
| [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Wikimedia Marker|Wikimedia Marker (WM-XX)]] || Starting || Nomenclature marking elements inspired by Wikimedia Foundation practices, being reframed around contract variables.
| [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Structured Data|Structured Data (Linked Data)]] || RDF, JSON-LD, and Wikidata integration for semantic interoperability.
|-
|-
| [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:AI Disclaimer|AI Disclaimer]] || Starting || Mandatory transparency marker on every AI-assisted page, requiring disclosure and human validation.
| [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Subscription|CHF 1/Month Subscription]] || Solidarity-priced membership; one month of usage = CHF 1 nominal.
|-
|-
| [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:AI Supported Deployment|AI Supported Deployment]] || Starting || Five AI-era work profiles combined with Open Calls to move from idea to prototype to deployment.
| [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Subscription-or-Membership|Subscription or Membership]] || Naming reflection: subscribers would also be members with voting rights; "subscription" chosen as the more inclusive term.
|}
 
<span id="specific-marketplaces"></span>
== Specific marketplaces ==
 
The second block gathers the innovations that concern specific marketplaces. It is expected to become very large over time, as many contributors bring many innovations; entries state, where relevant, which marketplace they concern.
 
{| class="wikitable sortable"
! Innovation !! Deployment status (July 2026, proposal) !! Summary
|-
|-
| [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:User Groups|User Groups]] || Starting || The coopetitive core of the Market: autonomous communities organizing freely, with their own governance and commissions. Concerns every marketplace.
| [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Time Resource Bank|Time & Resource Bank]] || Exchange housing, transport, food, and services via Miles Credits (time-bank tradition).
|-
|-
| [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Maturity Score|Use Case Maturity Score]] || Under study || Incubation and development indicator, showing how far a use case has developed. Concerns every marketplace portal.
| [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Truth Reconciliation|Commercial Truth & Reconciliation]] || Formal process to repair distrust and prevent forks caused by personal conflict.
|-
|-
| [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Revenue Spreading|Revenue Spreading]] || Under study || Payout choice for dialoguers, revenue better distributed, serving the interests of NGOs. Concerns the street fundraising marketplace (fundraising through dialogue).
| [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:User Groups|User Groups]] || Autonomous local/thematic communities with their own governance and commissions.
|-
|-
| [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Reverse Abuse|Reverse Abuse]] || Under study || Reusing multinationals' legal financial structures to repatriate value to small producers and user-governed supply chains.
| [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Wikimedia Marker|Wikimedia Marker (WM-XX)]] || Blue nomenclature marking elements inspired by Wikimedia Foundation practices.
|}
|}


Line 169: Line 73:


----
----
'''See also:''' [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Main|R&D Portal]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Call:Main|Open Call portal]]
'''See also:''' [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Main|All innovations]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Main|R&D Portal]]


[[Category:Migration June 2026]]
[[Category:Migration June 2026]]
<!-- visible -->
<!-- visible -->

Revision as of 14:14, 12 July 2026

💡 In simple words: WikiDeal has lots of clever, fair ideas built into it, about money, trust, sharing, and solving arguments. This page is the big list where you can find every one of them and read what each does.


WikiDeal Socio-Economic Innovations

Innovations index, WikiDeal R&D

This page is the comparative hub for the socio-economic innovations embedded in the WikiDeal model. Each innovation has a named origin (a foundation, movement, or individual thinker) and combines existing traditions (Wikimedia governance, the cooperative movement, token economics, free software, the Semantic Web) in ways specific to WikiDeal. The list is open and unlimited: the count does not matter, only the innovations do. These are intended as citizen-initiated innovations: ideas stemming from citizen initiative, proposed and refined in the open. The methodology envisaged to move them from idea to prototype and deployment (five work profiles combined with open calls) is described on the AI Supported Deployment page.

Origin legend: 🔵 Wikimedia Foundation · 🟢 WikiDeal concept (credits) · 🟠 Crypto / Token Economics · 🟣 Cooperative Movement · 🔴 Free Software Foundation · 🌐 Tim Berners-Lee / W3C

Innovation Origin-inspired summary
AI Disclaimer Mandatory transparency marker on every AI-assisted page, requiring disclosure and human validation.
AI Supported Deployment Working hypothesis for the R&D methodology: five AI-era work archetypes (Prototyper, Builder, Sweeper, Grower, Maintainer) combined with Open Calls to move from idea to prototype to deployment.
Annual Value Increase (draft Open Call) A possible annual percentage increase on rewards, under study through a draft Open Call (not yet launched); no percentage is decided.
Arbitration Chambers Three-level dispute resolution with Condorcet voting, inspired by Wikimedia's ArbCom.
Bonding Curve Transparent algorithm converting funding contributions into Credits; early funders get more per CHF.
Need-Driven Funding Auto-regulation adjusting maximum Rewards based on funding vs. incompressible costs.
Collaborative Contract Editing Contracts are wiki-edited, versioned, and community-validated like Wikipedia articles.
Co-opetition User Groups compete and cooperate at once, quality without destructive rivalry.
Deprivatization Reclaiming extractive markets as user-governed commons, as Wikipedia did for knowledge.
Double Commission Two small, transparent fees per transaction: a platform fee and a User Group fee.
Dual Rewards Two Credit types: Rewards (CHF-convertible, no guarantee*) and Miles Credits (community).
Exit to Community Progressive transfer of governance, ownership, and value to the user community.
Judgment Balance Indicator Auto-weighting of extreme ratings to keep feedback honest and calibrated.
Systematic Libre Licensing AGPL v3 for software, CC BY-SA 4.0 for content, everywhere, by default.
Use Case Maturity Score Composite per-portal score from seven indicators of marketplace health.
Open Calls Seasonal open invitations for community proposals to improve the WikiDeal model.
Paid Feedback Users earn Credits for useful feedback (~1 CHF/min); deductions for skipping it.
Participatory Observatory Internal monitoring of migrations, obsolescence risk, fundraising, and competition.
Peer Endorsement Volunteer lawyers endorse contracts and take named, accountable responsibility.
Revenue Spreading Dialoguers choose 100% payout in year 1 or 20% spread over ten years.
Reverse Abuse Programme-type mechanism reusing multinationals' legal financial structures to repatriate value to small producers and user-governed supply chains.
Rings of Trust Inter-User-Group agreements enabling Miles Credits interoperability.
Structured Data (Linked Data) RDF, JSON-LD, and Wikidata integration for semantic interoperability.
CHF 1/Month Subscription Solidarity-priced membership; one month of usage = CHF 1 nominal.
Subscription or Membership Naming reflection: subscribers would also be members with voting rights; "subscription" chosen as the more inclusive term.
Time & Resource Bank Exchange housing, transport, food, and services via Miles Credits (time-bank tradition).
Commercial Truth & Reconciliation Formal process to repair distrust and prevent forks caused by personal conflict.
User Groups Autonomous local/thematic communities with their own governance and commissions.
Wikimedia Marker (WM-XX) Blue nomenclature marking elements inspired by Wikimedia Foundation practices.

Reference language: English. Each innovation has its own page under R&D.

See also: All innovations · R&D Portal

Retrieved from "https://wikideal.net/w/index.php?title=Gov/en/Portal:R%26D/Innovations:Main&oldid=2158"