View source for Gov/en/Portal:Meta/AI-Deviation-Risks

{{KidsIntro|AI can become dangerous if humans manage the world unfairly. WikiDeal shows a fairer way to share resources — which helps reduce the risk of AI taking over to 'fix' our mistakes.}}

{{NotApproved}}

Home | About | Innovations | Success Criteria | [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Cash-Rewards|Credits]] | [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Main|Programmes]]  

= How WikiDeal Contributes to Reducing AI Deviation Risks =

The fundamental risk of artificial intelligence is not technical. It is political.

The scenario of an AI taking control is only credible in a world where humans have failed to regulate the use of their own resources. If society remains dominated by a hyper-individualistic and predatory vision towards the planet, then AI will only need to observe the failure and propose a &quot;better management&quot; — centralised, optimised, algorithmic. And that proposal will be logical.

WikiDeal proposes to eliminate the conditions that make this scenario logical.

== 1. Reducing the Management Failures That Would Justify a Takeover ==

AI only takes control if humans demonstrate their inability to manage their resources sustainably. WikiDeal attacks this problem at its root:

* '''Deprivatization''' — digital markets are reclaimed by their users, sector by sector, just as Wikipedia deprivatized knowledge. This eliminates value extraction by shareholders.
* '''At-cost pricing''' — no speculation, no stock market. Commissions cover real costs, nothing more. This removes the incentive to use AI as an extraction tool.
* '''Total transparency''' — every algorithm ([[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Bonding Curve|bonding curve]], [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Funding Stabilizer|Balance Boost]]) is auditable. The opacity that enables drift disappears.
* '''Participatory voting and commons''' — power is in the hands of users (1 person = 1 vote), valuing collective stewardship over individual accumulation.

== 2. Creating a Mindset of Solidarity to Last Together ==

WikiDeal does not merely correct economic mechanisms. It contributes to a cultural shift: replacing the predatory mindset with durable solidarity.

* '''[[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Rings Of Trust|Rings of Trust]]''' between communities create cooperation bonds that withstand crises.
* The '''Balance Boost''' distributes resources according to real needs — when there is enough, the individual share decreases; when there is urgency, it increases. This is human regulation, not algorithmic.
* The '''programmes''' (volunteering, real estate, education, recycling) integrate people into a functional economy where contributing and receiving balance naturally.

If humans prove they can regulate the use of their resources in this way, no AI — even hypothetically conscious — would have any rational justification for imposing itself above them.

== 3. AI as a Tool, Never as a Decision-Maker ==

Within WikiDeal, AI formalizes, structures, calculates and assists. It does not decide. Every piece of content generated by AI carries a disclaimer. Every contract must be endorsed by a human who takes editorial responsibility. AI serves the process, never rises above it.

== 4. Proof Through Action ==

This is not a theory. It is an applied Applied Research programme. If WikiDeal reaches critical mass — millions of users managing their resources equitably, transparently and in solidarity — this will constitute concrete proof that humanity knows how to self-regulate. And this proof will be the best assurance that society will never need to cede control.

''→ See also: 25 WikiDeal Innovations | Success Criteria | [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Cash-Rewards|Rewards Explained]] | Wikimedia References''

Formalized with AI assistance · April 2026

----
''See also: [[Gov/en/Portal:Meta/Internal-AI|Internal AI Transparency]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:Meta/Main|Meta / WikiOps]].''

[[Category:Migration June 2026]]