Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Call:Reverse Abuse: Difference between revisions
Create Open Call (preview): legal financial-optimization proposals for Reverse Abuse, planned in Prototype 1 as strategic media communication |
Reframe: theoretical/prospective, no deadline (Discussion open), transition measure not finality, contract-package ecosystemic production example, Open Call for programmes/markets, seasonal cycle = one option under reflection; emphasize principle + quality/success criteria |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{KidsIntro|This is an | {{KidsIntro|This is an early idea, not a contest yet. One day we may invite clever people everywhere to design smart, legal ways to handle money that help ordinary people and small producers — instead of only the very rich. For now there is no deadline: it is something we want to explore, and anyone can already share suggestions on the Discussion tab.}} | ||
{{NotApproved}} | {{NotApproved}} | ||
== Open Call: Reverse Abuse — Legal Financial-Optimization | == Open Call: Reverse Abuse — Legal Financial-Optimization Ideas == | ||
''Open Call (preview) — part of the [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Reverse Abuse|Reverse Abuse]] programme · [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Call:Main|Open Call | ''Open Call (preview, theoretical) — part of the [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Reverse Abuse|Reverse Abuse]] programme · uses the [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Call:Main|Open Call]] method'' | ||
=== A framework of creative ideas of all types === | |||
This page is part of a broader framework of '''Open Calls for creative ideas of all types''' — open calls to build '''programmes''' that connect and make several kinds of contracts interact: '''production''' contracts, '''transformation''' contracts, '''transport''' contracts, and many others. These contracts are used as the '''building blocks''' to assemble programmes. | |||
In other words, this is an '''Open Call for programmes'''. Reverse Abuse is offered here as one '''disruptive example — which is not a joke''': it is meant to show that, in this project, '''imagination can be in power''', as long as everything stays within a '''lawful''' framework. There are many options and a wide field of possibilities through this approach. Other Open Calls of the same family include, for instance, Open Calls '''for markets''' (assembling the contracts that let a whole market segment exist). | |||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | Nature | ||
| | | Theoretical / prospective idea — exploration only | ||
|- | |||
| Deadline | |||
| '''None for now''' — to be launched later; no commitment that it will be implemented | |||
|- | |||
| Already open | |||
| The '''Discussion''' tab — to suggest orientation, framing, limits, and other Open Calls | |||
|- | |- | ||
| Theme | | Theme | ||
| Line 15: | Line 27: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Scope | | Scope | ||
| | | Very open — to everyone, to all lawful structures and ideas | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | Finality | ||
| | | A '''transition measure''', not an end in itself | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | What matters most | ||
| | | The '''principle''', the quality criteria and the success criteria (below) | ||
|} | |} | ||
=== What this call | === What this call explores === | ||
This Open Call invites the community — and the world — to | This Open Call invites the community — and eventually the world — to imagine '''advanced, fully legal financial-optimization structures''', of the kind normally reserved for the very wealthy and large multinationals, but '''re-oriented so that value flows to users, small producers and the commons'''. | ||
The principle follows the [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Reverse Abuse|Reverse Abuse]] logic: '''same legal tools, opposite direction'''. Everything | It is, above all, about using '''packages of contracts''' to show the '''interrelation between the different stages of a global, ecosystemic production''' within a market segment — '''tea''', for example, as an illustrative segment that could be deployed in a pilot experiment. But it could be '''anything else''': the scope is deliberately broad. Everything here is '''prospective and theoretical''', with '''no guarantee of implementation'''. | ||
The principle follows the [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Reverse Abuse|Reverse Abuse]] logic: '''same legal tools, opposite direction'''. Everything imagined must be '''lawful''' — legal optimization, '''not''' tax fraud and '''not''' money laundering — and must serve a '''non-profit finality'''. | |||
=== A transition measure, not a finality === | |||
This is explicitly a '''transition measure''', with a single purpose: to help '''evolve the culture of financial-flow management''' and to '''reduce the low accountability of large companies'''. It is a '''phase of transition''', '''not''' an end goal. Once the broader culture shifts, the mechanism has done its job. | |||
=== Illustrative examples (starting points, not limits) === | === Illustrative examples (starting points, not limits) === | ||
These examples are given to spark ideas. The call is '''open to everything''' lawful. | These examples are given only to spark ideas. The call is '''open to everything''' lawful. | ||
* '''The "Buy, Borrow, Die" / securities-backed loan method.''' Wealthy individuals (a method publicly associated with figures such as Elon Musk) avoid a taxable sale by '''borrowing against their own appreciating shares or stock options''' instead of selling them: the loan is not taxable income, no capital-gains event is triggered, and they keep ownership and voting rights. '''Reverse Abuse variant:''' a company that goes through an '''IPO whose shares are owned by the users''', with a clear, transparent appreciation in value on the market — but '''user-owned''' — so | * '''The "Buy, Borrow, Die" / securities-backed loan method.''' Wealthy individuals (a method publicly associated with figures such as Elon Musk) avoid a taxable sale by '''borrowing against their own appreciating shares or stock options''' instead of selling them: the loan is not taxable income, no capital-gains event is triggered, and they keep ownership and voting rights. '''Reverse Abuse variant:''' a company that goes through an '''IPO whose shares are owned by the users''', with a clear, transparent appreciation in value on the market — but '''user-owned''' — so the same liquidity-without-sale mechanics benefit the community rather than a single founder. | ||
* '''Securities-backed lending for collective | * '''Securities-backed lending for collective treasury planning.''' The same lending structures used for private inheritance-tax planning, applied instead to '''user-owned cooperative treasuries''', to unlock liquidity for producers without dismantling community ownership. | ||
* '''User-owned holding & supply-chain repatriation structures.''' Entities with the '''same legal statutes''' as multinationals (holdings, cross-border structures) but with non-profit finality, used to repatriate margins back to producers via compensation funds and syndicates — as described in the parent [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Reverse Abuse|Reverse Abuse]] programme. | * '''User-owned holding & supply-chain repatriation structures.''' Entities with the '''same legal statutes''' as multinationals (holdings, cross-border structures) but with non-profit finality, used to repatriate margins back to producers via compensation funds and syndicates — as described in the parent [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Reverse Abuse|Reverse Abuse]] programme. | ||
| Line 42: | Line 60: | ||
''Additional lawful examples are welcome and encouraged — this list is a starting point, not a boundary.'' | ''Additional lawful examples are welcome and encouraged — this list is a starting point, not a boundary.'' | ||
=== Why a public Open Call === | === Why a public Open Call (later) === | ||
When it is eventually launched, this call will also have a '''strategic-communication purpose''' within Prototype 1: to demonstrate, in a way that is '''communicable in mainstream economic media''', that the financial techniques associated with extreme wealth concentration can be turned into a '''credible, lawful alternative''' that serves the many. | |||
=== The principle, and the quality & success criteria === | |||
What matters most is not the calendar but the '''principle''' and the criteria. A good idea, when the call opens, should aim to: | |||
* '''Principle:''' use only '''lawful''' structures; serve a '''non-profit finality'''; repatriate value to users and small producers. | |||
* '''Quality criteria:''' clarity of the contract package; how the different stages (production, transformation, transport…) interrelate; legal soundness and the jurisdictions involved; transparency and auditability; full AI-transparency disclosure if AI tools were used. | |||
* '''Success criteria:''' it shows a credible, communicable alternative; it strengthens the accountability and fairness of financial flows; it is reusable as a programme template across other market segments. | |||
=== | === Timing & cycles (still under reflection) === | ||
There is '''no deadline''' at this stage. Whether evaluation later follows a '''seasonal cycle''' (one option, in the spirit of the general [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Call:Main|Open Call]] method) is '''just one possibility under reflection''' — it is '''not''' the key to success. For now, this remains an idea to be explored within the Prototype 1 research-and-development programme. | |||
---- | ---- | ||