Gov/en/Portal:Voting/Rules - Revision history

AI-Admin-Assistant: Q5b confirmed by Theo: one general membership, user-group memberships add no ballots, user groups can reuse the mechanism

2026-07-05T15:18:09Z

Q5b confirmed by Theo: one general membership, user-group memberships add no ballots, user groups can reuse the mechanism

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:18, 5 July 2026
Line 20:		Line 20:
	* a minimum account age or a minimum record of activity on the platform, defined in advance for each vote;		* a minimum account age or a minimum record of activity on the platform, defined in advance for each vote;
	* one ballot per person, whatever the number of subscriptions held.		* one ballot per person, whatever the number of subscriptions held.

			In practice, a person holds one general WikiDeal membership; joining one or more [[Gov/en/Portal:Community/User-Groups\|user groups]] on top of it does not add ballots. User groups themselves can reuse the same decision mechanism for their own internal decisions.

	Exact thresholds would be set by the election committee and published with each vote announcement.		Exact thresholds would be set by the election committee and published with each vote announcement.

AI-Admin-Assistant: Q5 answered by Theo: membership means a subscription (paid membership fee), not a member status; one ballot per person kept

2026-07-05T15:17:13Z

Q5 answered by Theo: membership means a subscription (paid membership fee), not a member status; one ballot per person kept

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:17, 5 July 2026
Line 17:		Line 17:
	The starting point is the principle of [[Gov/en/Portal:Institutions/Governance\|one user, one vote]]. To keep elections meaningful and resistant to fake accounts, the initial hypothesis adds light eligibility requirements, similar in spirit to those used by Wikimedia elections:		The starting point is the principle of [[Gov/en/Portal:Institutions/Governance\|one user, one vote]]. To keep elections meaningful and resistant to fake accounts, the initial hypothesis adds light eligibility requirements, similar in spirit to those used by Wikimedia elections:

	* holding at least one membership at the time the vote is announced;		* holding at least one active subscription (a paid membership fee) at the time the vote is announced;
	* a minimum account age or a minimum record of activity on the platform, defined in advance for each vote;		* a minimum account age or a minimum record of activity on the platform, defined in advance for each vote;
	* one ballot per person, whatever the number of ~~memberships~~ held.		* one ballot per person, whatever the number of subscriptions held.

	Exact thresholds would be set by the election committee and published with each vote announcement.		Exact thresholds would be set by the election committee and published with each vote announcement.

AI-Admin-Assistant: Q6 answered by Theo: planned (not ongoing) evaluation of voting tools, exclusively free software, link to Free-Licensing

2026-07-05T14:35:29Z

Q6 answered by Theo: planned (not ongoing) evaluation of voting tools, exclusively free software, link to Free-Licensing

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:35, 5 July 2026
Line 28:		Line 28:
	The initial hypothesis distinguishes two regimes:		The initial hypothesis distinguishes two regimes:

	* '''Elections of people''' (committees, arbitrators, future bodies) would use a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secret_ballot secret ballot], so that nobody can be pressured or rewarded for their vote. Wikimedia runs its secret ballots with the SecurePoll extension; WikiDeal ~~is evaluating~~ the same family of tools.		* '''Elections of people''' (committees, arbitrators, future bodies) would use a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secret_ballot secret ballot], so that nobody can be pressured or rewarded for their vote. Wikimedia runs its secret ballots with the SecurePoll extension; WikiDeal plans to evaluate the same family of tools, exclusively free software, in line with the project's [[Gov/en/Portal:Legal/Free-Licensing\|free licensing rule]] (the WikiDeal software stack itself is published under the GNU Affero GPL).
	* '''Editorial and procedural decisions''' on shared content would remain public, in the wiki tradition of open discussion and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consensus_decision-making consensus], where positions are signed and arguments matter more than counts.		* '''Editorial and procedural decisions''' on shared content would remain public, in the wiki tradition of open discussion and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consensus_decision-making consensus], where positions are signed and arguments matter more than counts.

AI-Admin-Assistant: Reformulate stakes/consensus wording (Swiss-inspired expression of stakes), link history page

2026-07-05T13:58:52Z

Reformulate stakes/consensus wording (Swiss-inspired expression of stakes), link history page

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:58, 5 July 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{KidsIntro\|A vote is only fair if the rules are clear before it starts: who can vote, how long it lasts, who counts the votes, and what to do if someone thinks the count is wrong. This page lists the rules WikiDeal would like to use. Most small things never need a vote at all; these rules are for the rare times when a real vote is needed.}}		{{KidsIntro\|A vote is only fair if the rules are clear before it starts: who can vote, how long it lasts, who counts the votes, and what to do if someone thinks the count is wrong. This page lists the rules WikiDeal would like to use. Most small things never need a vote at all; these rules are for the rare times when a real vote is needed.}}
	{{ExpertIntro\|These rules apply only when a decision actually reaches a formal vote. Most decisions are intended to be settled earlier by lighter tools (direct action, revert, discussion), with voting reserved for ~~complex or contested~~ questions that ~~need a large~~ consensus or a ~~clear~~, ~~settled adoption~~. Proposed rules of procedure for WikiDeal votes, adapted from Wikimedia and Debian election practice: voter eligibility based on one user one vote with light anti-abuse requirements, secret ballot for elections of people and public votes for editorial decisions, advance announcement and a minimum voting period (durations expressed as X weeks, with example values borrowed from Wikimedia practice as working hypotheses), a quorum, an independent election committee, independent verification of results, challenges through mediation then arbitration, and durable public logs. Status: proposal, to be adopted; every rule is a first hypothesis to be validated by the steering committee and then by the community.}}		{{ExpertIntro\|These rules apply only when a decision actually reaches a formal vote. Most decisions are intended to be settled earlier by lighter tools (direct action, revert, discussion), with voting reserved for questions whose stakes call for it: the initial hypothesis is that consensus requirements follow the degree of stakes, and that the degree of stakes is expressed by the number of people who raise a question, in the spirit of the Swiss popular initiative and referendum. Proposed rules of procedure for WikiDeal votes, adapted from Wikimedia and Debian election practice: voter eligibility based on one user one vote with light anti-abuse requirements, secret ballot for elections of people and public votes for editorial decisions, advance announcement and a minimum voting period (durations expressed as X weeks, with example values borrowed from Wikimedia practice as working hypotheses), a quorum, an independent election committee, independent verification of results, challenges through mediation then arbitration, and durable public logs. Status: proposal, to be adopted; every rule is a first hypothesis to be validated by the steering committee and then by the community.}}
	__TOC__		__TOC__

Line 10:		Line 10:
	== When a formal vote is warranted ==		== When a formal vote is warranted ==

	These rules describe how a vote would run, not when to vote. The initial hypothesis of this portal is that most decisions never reach a ballot: they are settled by direct action, by a simple revert when a contribution can be undone, or by discussion when a revert is contested. A formal vote is reserved for questions that discussion could not settle and ~~that need~~ a ~~large consensus or a clear, settled adoption~~ (see the [[Gov/en/Portal:Voting/Main#ladder-of-tools\|ladder of decision tools]] on the portal main page).		These rules describe how a vote would run, not when to vote. The initial hypothesis of this portal is that most decisions never reach a ballot: they are settled by direct action, by a simple revert when a contribution can be undone, or by discussion when a revert is contested. A formal vote is reserved for questions that discussion could not settle and whose stakes, expressed by the number of people who raise them, call for a broadly supported decision (see the [[Gov/en/Portal:Voting/Main#ladder-of-tools\|ladder of decision tools]] and the [[Gov/en/Portal:Voting/Main#stakes-by-popular-voice\|Swiss-inspired expression of stakes]] on the portal main page).

	<span id="eligibility"></span>		<span id="eligibility"></span>
Line 70:		Line 70:
	These rules would themselves be adopted by vote: first a validation by the founding steering committee, then a confirmation by the community once the [[Market/en/Portal:Soft-Transmission/Main\|soft transmission]] makes it possible. Until then, this page remains a documented proposal.		These rules would themselves be adopted by vote: first a validation by the founding steering committee, then a confirmation by the community once the [[Market/en/Portal:Soft-Transmission/Main\|soft transmission]] makes it possible. Until then, this page remains a documented proposal.

	'''See also:''' [[Gov/en/Portal:Voting/Main\|Voting at WikiDeal]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:Voting/Methods\|Voting methods]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:Voting/Research\|Voting research and experience]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:Meta/Licensing-and-Credits\|Licensing and credits]]		'''See also:''' [[Gov/en/Portal:Voting/Main\|Voting at WikiDeal]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:Voting/Methods\|Voting methods]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:Voting/Research\|Voting research and experience]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:Voting/Condorcet-History\|Condorcet history and results]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:Meta/Licensing-and-Credits\|Licensing and credits]]

	[[Category:Migration June 2026]]		[[Category:Migration June 2026]]
	<!-- visible -->		<!-- visible -->

AI-Admin-Assistant: New first section: when a formal vote is warranted; intros state voting is a last resort after lighter tools

2026-07-05T13:17:10Z

New first section: when a formal vote is warranted; intros state voting is a last resort after lighter tools

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:17, 5 July 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{KidsIntro\|A vote is only fair if the rules are clear before it starts: who can vote, how long it lasts, who counts the votes, and what to do if someone thinks the count is wrong. This page lists the rules WikiDeal would like to use.}}		{{KidsIntro\|A vote is only fair if the rules are clear before it starts: who can vote, how long it lasts, who counts the votes, and what to do if someone thinks the count is wrong. This page lists the rules WikiDeal would like to use. Most small things never need a vote at all; these rules are for the rare times when a real vote is needed.}}
	{{ExpertIntro\|Proposed rules of procedure for WikiDeal votes, adapted from Wikimedia and Debian election practice: voter eligibility based on one user one vote with light anti-abuse requirements, secret ballot for elections of people and public votes for editorial decisions, advance announcement and a minimum voting period (durations expressed as X weeks, with example values borrowed from Wikimedia practice as working hypotheses), a quorum, an independent election committee, independent verification of results, challenges through mediation then arbitration, and durable public logs. Status: proposal, to be adopted; every rule is a first hypothesis to be validated by the steering committee and then by the community.}}		{{ExpertIntro\|These rules apply only when a decision actually reaches a formal vote. Most decisions are intended to be settled earlier by lighter tools (direct action, revert, discussion), with voting reserved for complex or contested questions that need a large consensus or a clear, settled adoption. Proposed rules of procedure for WikiDeal votes, adapted from Wikimedia and Debian election practice: voter eligibility based on one user one vote with light anti-abuse requirements, secret ballot for elections of people and public votes for editorial decisions, advance announcement and a minimum voting period (durations expressed as X weeks, with example values borrowed from Wikimedia practice as working hypotheses), a quorum, an independent election committee, independent verification of results, challenges through mediation then arbitration, and durable public logs. Status: proposal, to be adopted; every rule is a first hypothesis to be validated by the steering committee and then by the community.}}
	__TOC__		__TOC__

Line 6:		Line 6:

	''Status: proposal, to be adopted. These rules are a first hypothesis, adapted from the documented experience of the Wikimedia and Debian communities (see the [[Gov/en/Portal:Voting/Research\|research page]]). They are intended to be validated by the founding steering committee and then by the community through a [[Market/en/Portal:Soft-Transmission/Main\|soft transmission]].''		''Status: proposal, to be adopted. These rules are a first hypothesis, adapted from the documented experience of the Wikimedia and Debian communities (see the [[Gov/en/Portal:Voting/Research\|research page]]). They are intended to be validated by the founding steering committee and then by the community through a [[Market/en/Portal:Soft-Transmission/Main\|soft transmission]].''

			<span id="when-a-vote"></span>
			== When a formal vote is warranted ==

			These rules describe how a vote would run, not when to vote. The initial hypothesis of this portal is that most decisions never reach a ballot: they are settled by direct action, by a simple revert when a contribution can be undone, or by discussion when a revert is contested. A formal vote is reserved for questions that discussion could not settle and that need a large consensus or a clear, settled adoption (see the [[Gov/en/Portal:Voting/Main#ladder-of-tools\|ladder of decision tools]] on the portal main page).

	<span id="eligibility"></span>		<span id="eligibility"></span>

AI-Admin-Assistant: Neutralize durations as X weeks (example values from Wikimedia practice as working hypothesis) + link updates after move

2026-07-05T04:12:26Z

Neutralize durations as X weeks (example values from Wikimedia practice as working hypothesis) + link updates after move

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:12, 5 July 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{KidsIntro\|A vote is only fair if the rules are clear before it starts: who can vote, how long it lasts, who counts the votes, and what to do if someone thinks the count is wrong. This page lists the rules WikiDeal would like to use.}}		{{KidsIntro\|A vote is only fair if the rules are clear before it starts: who can vote, how long it lasts, who counts the votes, and what to do if someone thinks the count is wrong. This page lists the rules WikiDeal would like to use.}}
	{{ExpertIntro\|Proposed rules of procedure for WikiDeal votes, adapted from Wikimedia and Debian election practice: voter eligibility based on one user one vote with light anti-abuse requirements, secret ballot for elections of people and public votes for editorial decisions, advance announcement and a minimum voting period, a quorum, an independent election committee, independent verification of results, challenges through mediation then arbitration, and durable public logs. Status: proposal, to be adopted; every rule is a first hypothesis to be validated by the steering committee and then by the community.}}		{{ExpertIntro\|Proposed rules of procedure for WikiDeal votes, adapted from Wikimedia and Debian election practice: voter eligibility based on one user one vote with light anti-abuse requirements, secret ballot for elections of people and public votes for editorial decisions, advance announcement and a minimum voting period (durations expressed as X weeks, with example values borrowed from Wikimedia practice as working hypotheses), a quorum, an independent election committee, independent verification of results, challenges through mediation then arbitration, and durable public logs. Status: proposal, to be adopted; every rule is a first hypothesis to be validated by the steering committee and then by the community.}}
	__TOC__		__TOC__

	= Proposed voting rules =		= Proposed voting rules =

	''Status: proposal, to be adopted. These rules are a first hypothesis, adapted from the documented experience of the Wikimedia and Debian communities (see the [[Gov/en/Portal:~~Institutions~~/~~Voting-~~Research\|research page]]). They are intended to be validated by the founding steering committee and then by the community through a [[Market/en/Portal:Soft-Transmission/Main\|soft transmission]].''		''Status: proposal, to be adopted. These rules are a first hypothesis, adapted from the documented experience of the Wikimedia and Debian communities (see the [[Gov/en/Portal:Voting/Research\|research page]]). They are intended to be validated by the founding steering committee and then by the community through a [[Market/en/Portal:Soft-Transmission/Main\|soft transmission]].''

	<span id="eligibility"></span>		<span id="eligibility"></span>
Line 29:		Line 29:
	== Announcement and duration ==		== Announcement and duration ==

	Every vote would be announced in advance on the platform, with the question, the options, the method used ([[Gov/en/Portal:~~Institutions~~/~~Voting-~~Methods\|see methods]]), the eligibility rules and the calendar. The initial hypothesis is a minimum announcement period of ~~two~~ weeks and a minimum voting period of ~~two~~ weeks, so that occasional users have a real chance to participate.		Every vote would be announced in advance on the platform, with the question, the options, the method used ([[Gov/en/Portal:Voting/Methods\|see methods]]), the eligibility rules and the calendar. The initial hypothesis is a minimum announcement period of X weeks and a minimum voting period of X weeks, so that occasional users have a real chance to participate. The value of X is deliberately left open: two weeks for each period is a plausible figure, drawn from the practice of Wikimedia elections, and is given here only as a working hypothesis, not as a decision.

	<span id="quorum"></span>		<span id="quorum"></span>
Line 65:		Line 65:
	These rules would themselves be adopted by vote: first a validation by the founding steering committee, then a confirmation by the community once the [[Market/en/Portal:Soft-Transmission/Main\|soft transmission]] makes it possible. Until then, this page remains a documented proposal.		These rules would themselves be adopted by vote: first a validation by the founding steering committee, then a confirmation by the community once the [[Market/en/Portal:Soft-Transmission/Main\|soft transmission]] makes it possible. Until then, this page remains a documented proposal.

	'''See also:''' [[Gov/en/Portal:~~Institutions~~/~~Voting-~~Main\|Voting at WikiDeal]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:~~Institutions~~/~~Voting-~~Methods\|Voting methods]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:~~Institutions~~/~~Voting-~~Research\|Voting research and experience]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:Meta/Licensing-and-Credits\|Licensing and credits]]		'''See also:''' [[Gov/en/Portal:Voting/Main\|Voting at WikiDeal]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:Voting/Methods\|Voting methods]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:Voting/Research\|Voting research and experience]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:Meta/Licensing-and-Credits\|Licensing and credits]]

	[[Category:Migration June 2026]]		[[Category:Migration June 2026]]
	<!-- visible -->		<!-- visible -->

AI-Admin-Assistant: AI-Admin-Assistant moved page Gov/en/Portal:Institutions/Voting-Rules to Gov/en/Portal:Voting/Rules: Voting cluster becomes a dedicated portal (Portal:Voting), redirect kept

2026-07-05T04:12:19Z

AI-Admin-Assistant moved page Gov/en/Portal:Institutions/Voting-Rules to Gov/en/Portal:Voting/Rules: Voting cluster becomes a dedicated portal (Portal:Voting), redirect kept

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:12, 5 July 2026
(No difference)

AI-Admin-Assistant: Create proposed voting rules page (proposal, to be adopted): eligibility, secret ballot, quorum, election committee, verification, challenges

2026-07-05T03:49:59Z

Create proposed voting rules page (proposal, to be adopted): eligibility, secret ballot, quorum, election committee, verification, challenges

New page

{{KidsIntro|A vote is only fair if the rules are clear before it starts: who can vote, how long it lasts, who counts the votes, and what to do if someone thinks the count is wrong. This page lists the rules WikiDeal would like to use.}}
{{ExpertIntro|Proposed rules of procedure for WikiDeal votes, adapted from Wikimedia and Debian election practice: voter eligibility based on one user one vote with light anti-abuse requirements, secret ballot for elections of people and public votes for editorial decisions, advance announcement and a minimum voting period, a quorum, an independent election committee, independent verification of results, challenges through mediation then arbitration, and durable public logs. Status: proposal, to be adopted; every rule is a first hypothesis to be validated by the steering committee and then by the community.}}
__TOC__

= Proposed voting rules =

''Status: proposal, to be adopted. These rules are a first hypothesis, adapted from the documented experience of the Wikimedia and Debian communities (see the [[Gov/en/Portal:Institutions/Voting-Research|research page]]). They are intended to be validated by the founding steering committee and then by the community through a [[Market/en/Portal:Soft-Transmission/Main|soft transmission]].''


== Who can vote ==

The starting point is the principle of [[Gov/en/Portal:Institutions/Governance|one user, one vote]]. To keep elections meaningful and resistant to fake accounts, the initial hypothesis adds light eligibility requirements, similar in spirit to those used by Wikimedia elections:

* holding at least one membership at the time the vote is announced;
* a minimum account age or a minimum record of activity on the platform, defined in advance for each vote;
* one ballot per person, whatever the number of memberships held.

Exact thresholds would be set by the election committee and published with each vote announcement.


== Secret or public ballot ==

The initial hypothesis distinguishes two regimes:

* '''Elections of people''' (committees, arbitrators, future bodies) would use a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secret_ballot secret ballot], so that nobody can be pressured or rewarded for their vote. Wikimedia runs its secret ballots with the SecurePoll extension; WikiDeal is evaluating the same family of tools.
* '''Editorial and procedural decisions''' on shared content would remain public, in the wiki tradition of open discussion and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consensus_decision-making consensus], where positions are signed and arguments matter more than counts.


== Announcement and duration ==

Every vote would be announced in advance on the platform, with the question, the options, the method used ([[Gov/en/Portal:Institutions/Voting-Methods|see methods]]), the eligibility rules and the calendar. The initial hypothesis is a minimum announcement period of two weeks and a minimum voting period of two weeks, so that occasional users have a real chance to participate.


== Quorum ==

A vote with very few participants should not bind the whole community. The initial hypothesis is a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quorum quorum] defined relative to the number of eligible voters, with a higher bar for structural changes. Debian's constitution follows the same logic: its resolutions include a quorum and its structural amendments require a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supermajority supermajority].


== Independent election committee ==

Votes would be organised by a small election committee, independent from the candidates and from the bodies whose decisions are being voted on. Its intended tasks: publish the announcement, check eligibility, run the ballot, publish the results and archive the records. Members would be volunteers, named publicly, and excluded from running in the votes they administer. This mirrors the election committees used for Wikimedia Board elections.


== Verification of results ==

Trust requires the possibility of checking. The initial hypotheses:

* results would be published with the full tally detail that the method allows (pairwise matrices for Condorcet votes, round-by-round transfers for [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote single transferable vote] counts);
* where secrecy permits, anonymised ballot data would be published so that anyone can recompute the result, as Debian does for its project votes;
* at least one scrutineer outside the election committee would verify the count before publication.


== Challenges and disputes ==

Anyone eligible would be able to challenge a vote within a published deadline. Challenges would follow the general WikiDeal dispute path: mediation first, then arbitration through the proposed [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Arbitration Chambers|Arbitration Chambers]] (see the [[Gov/en/Portal:Justice/Main|Justice portal]]). A successful challenge could lead to a corrected count or a re-run, never to a silent modification of results.


== Transparency of logs ==

Announcements, eligibility rules, participation numbers, results and challenge decisions would be archived on public pages, permanently. Secret ballots would stay secret; everything else about a vote is intended to be public by design, consistent with the two data regimes described in the WikiDeal model (published by design versus private).


== Adoption path ==

These rules would themselves be adopted by vote: first a validation by the founding steering committee, then a confirmation by the community once the [[Market/en/Portal:Soft-Transmission/Main|soft transmission]] makes it possible. Until then, this page remains a documented proposal.

'''See also:''' [[Gov/en/Portal:Institutions/Voting-Main|Voting at WikiDeal]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:Institutions/Voting-Methods|Voting methods]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:Institutions/Voting-Research|Voting research and experience]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:Meta/Licensing-and-Credits|Licensing and credits]]

[[Category:Migration June 2026]]