Gov/en/Portal:Rules/Success-Criteria - Revision history

AI-Admin-Assistant: Rewards vocabulary: umbrella term Credits renamed to Rewards (Theo 2026-08-03)

2026-08-03T06:58:55Z

Rewards vocabulary: umbrella term Credits renamed to Rewards (Theo 2026-08-03)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:58, 3 August 2026
Line 52:		Line 52:
	Need-Driven Funding: a powerful, transparent incentive mechanism		Need-Driven Funding: a powerful, transparent incentive mechanism

	Need-Driven Funding is WikiDeal's primary mechanism for attracting early funders and rewarding community contributions. Built on a [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Bonding Curve\|bonding curve]], it means early contributors receive proportionally more ~~Credits~~ for the same contribution — rewarding trust and early participation.		Need-Driven Funding is WikiDeal's primary mechanism for attracting early funders and rewarding community contributions. Built on a [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Bonding Curve\|bonding curve]], it means early contributors receive proportionally more Rewards for the same contribution, rewarding trust and early participation.

	Unlike conventional reward programmes, Need-Driven Funding is mathematically transparent: the bonding curve formula is public, auditable, and hardcoded into the smart contract. There are no hidden multipliers, no fine print. The boost decreases as the community grows, creating a natural incentive for early adoption.		Unlike conventional reward programmes, Need-Driven Funding is mathematically transparent: the bonding curve formula is public, auditable, and hardcoded into the smart contract. There are no hidden multipliers, no fine print. The boost decreases as the community grows, creating a natural incentive for early adoption.

AI-Admin-Assistant: Terminology pass 2: unify historical names (Balanced Boost, Balance Boost, The Boost) under Need-Driven Funding

2026-07-07T03:38:18Z

Terminology pass 2: unify historical names (Balanced Boost, Balance Boost, The Boost) under Need-Driven Funding

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:38, 7 July 2026
Line 50:		Line 50:
	CRITERION 3		CRITERION 3

	~~The Boost — A~~ powerful, transparent incentive mechanism		Need-Driven Funding: a powerful, transparent incentive mechanism

	~~The Boost~~ is WikiDeal's primary mechanism for attracting early funders and rewarding community contributions. Built on a [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Bonding Curve\|bonding curve]], it means early contributors receive proportionally more Credits for the same contribution — rewarding trust and early participation.		Need-Driven Funding is WikiDeal's primary mechanism for attracting early funders and rewarding community contributions. Built on a [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Bonding Curve\|bonding curve]], it means early contributors receive proportionally more Credits for the same contribution — rewarding trust and early participation.

	Unlike conventional reward programmes, ~~the Boost~~ is mathematically transparent: the bonding curve formula is public, auditable, and hardcoded into the smart contract. There are no hidden multipliers, no fine print. The boost decreases as the community grows, creating a natural incentive for early adoption.		Unlike conventional reward programmes, Need-Driven Funding is mathematically transparent: the bonding curve formula is public, auditable, and hardcoded into the smart contract. There are no hidden multipliers, no fine print. The boost decreases as the community grows, creating a natural incentive for early adoption.

	→ See: [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/What-You-Get\|What You Buy]] ·		→ See: [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/What-You-Get\|What You Buy]] ·

AI-Admin-Assistant: Terminology: Need-Driven Funding replaces Funding Stabilizer / Boost mechanism (Theo 2026-07-07)

2026-07-07T03:37:11Z

Terminology: Need-Driven Funding replaces Funding Stabilizer / Boost mechanism (Theo 2026-07-07)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:37, 7 July 2026
Line 47:		Line 47:
	→ See: [[Gov/en/Portal:Institutions/Governance\|WikiDeal Governance]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Why-Fund-WikiDeal\|Why Fund WikiDeal]]		→ See: [[Gov/en/Portal:Institutions/Governance\|WikiDeal Governance]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Why-Fund-WikiDeal\|Why Fund WikiDeal]]

	=== 3. Attractive ~~Boost Mechanism~~ ===		=== 3. Attractive Need-Driven Funding mechanism ===
	CRITERION 3		CRITERION 3

AI-Admin-Assistant: Protected "Gov/en/Portal:Rules/Success-Criteria": Bulk protection: Gov pages = administrators only (Theo 2026-06-20) ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))

2026-06-20T13:28:25Z

Protected "Gov/en/Portal:Rules/Success-Criteria": Bulk protection: Gov pages = administrators only (Theo 2026-06-20) ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:28, 20 June 2026
(No difference)

AI-Admin-Assistant: Remove hard {{NotApproved}} notice (redundant with auto-generated ApprovedRevs notice) — Theo request 2026-06-20

2026-06-20T13:12:14Z

Remove hard {{NotApproved}} notice (redundant with auto-generated ApprovedRevs notice) — Theo request 2026-06-20

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:12, 20 June 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{KidsIntro\|This page lists the signs that show a project is doing well.}}		{{KidsIntro\|This page lists the signs that show a project is doing well.}}

	~~{{NotApproved}}~~

	Success Criteria		Success Criteria

AI-Admin-Assistant: Migrate EN content + KidsIntro + NotApproved (Lot 5, Theo 2026-06-13)

2026-06-13T20:50:40Z

Migrate EN content + KidsIntro + NotApproved (Lot 5, Theo 2026-06-13)

New page

{{KidsIntro|This page lists the signs that show a project is doing well.}}

{{NotApproved}}

Success Criteria

{| class="wikitable"
|-
| Category
| Wiki Core · Economic Model
|-
| Status
| Applied Research · Active Development
|-
| Maturity
| 🟠 35% — Framework drafted
|-
| Licence
| AGPL v3 · CC BY-SA 4.0
|-
| Related
| · 4 Concepts · [[Gov/en/Portal:Institutions/Governance|Governance]]
|}

Maturity Score: 35%

== Socio-Economic Success Criteria ==
This page presents WikiDeal's economic model through the lens of '''success criteria''' — the conditions that must be met for WikiDeal to be genuinely different from extractive platforms, and genuinely useful to the communities it serves. Each criterion is linked to the detailed documentation where it is developed further.
=== 1. Low Commissions (1–2% at Cost) ===
CRITERION 1

Low Commissions — 1 to 2%, at cost

WikiDeal's Commissions are set at cost — covering only the operational expenses of running the platform (servers, support, development). There are no shareholders extracting profit, no venture capital to repay. The target is 1–2% Commission on Transactions, compared to 15–30% on extractive platforms.

This is not a marketing claim. It is a structural commitment enforced by WikiDeal's governance: Commission rates are publicly auditable, tied to real operating costs, and reviewed annually by the community. If costs fall, Commissions fall.

→ See: · The 4 Concepts

=== 2. At-Cost Pricing ===
CRITERION 2

At-Cost Pricing — No shareholders, no stock market

WikiDeal is not listed on any stock exchange and has no external shareholders extracting profit. All surplus generated by the platform is reinvested into the community — funding incubators, improving Infrastructure, and seeding new marketplace verticals.

This is the structural basis for low Commissions: without profit extraction pressure, pricing can track actual costs. This also means WikiDeal cannot be "unicorned" — there is no exit strategy that would betray the community for contributor returns.

→ See: [[Gov/en/Portal:Institutions/Governance|WikiDeal Governance]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Why-Fund-WikiDeal|Why Fund WikiDeal]]

=== 3. Attractive Boost Mechanism ===
CRITERION 3

The Boost — A powerful, transparent incentive mechanism

The Boost is WikiDeal's primary mechanism for attracting early funders and rewarding community contributions. Built on a [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Bonding Curve|bonding curve]], it means early contributors receive proportionally more Credits for the same contribution — rewarding trust and early participation.

Unlike conventional reward programmes, the Boost is mathematically transparent: the bonding curve formula is public, auditable, and hardcoded into the smart contract. There are no hidden multipliers, no fine print. The boost decreases as the community grows, creating a natural incentive for early adoption.

→ See: [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/What-You-Get|What You Buy]] ·

=== 4. Organic Incubation: User Groups → Rings of Trust ===
CRITERION 4

Organic Incubation — Community grows from within

WikiDeal does not scale by hiring armies of employees or acquiring competitors. It scales by incubating User Groups — small, local teams of 5–20 people who adopt WikiDeal tools, build local trust networks, and gradually expand marketplace activity in their territory.

User Groups evolve into Rings of Trust as they accumulate track record, validated contributions, and community recognition. This organic model is slower than venture-funded growth but more resilient — each node is locally rooted and self-sustaining.

→ See: [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:User Groups|User Groups & Rings]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:Institutions/Governance|Governance]]

=== 5. Donations + Volunteering = Competitive Advantage at Launch ===
CRITERION 5

Community Capital — Donations and volunteering as strategic assets

At launch, WikiDeal's primary competitive advantage is not technology or capital — it is the willingness of community members to contribute time, skills, and money to a shared project they believe in. This "community capital" allows WikiDeal to operate at lower cost than commercial competitors while building authentic relationships.

Volunteers contribute to governance, content, translation, development, and street fundraising. Donors fund the Infrastructure. This creates a virtuous cycle: community contribution → better platform → more community contribution. Success criteria: volunteer retention rate, Donation growth, active contributor count.

→ See: Street Fundraising · Create User Group

=== 6. Automated Step-by-Step Guidance ===
CRITERION 6

Evidence-Based Automation — Forms, checklists, photo evidence

WikiDeal's platform guides every interaction through structured, automated step-by-step processes: forms that capture necessary information, checklists that ensure quality standards are met, photo evidence that creates an auditable record. This reduces friction, prevents disputes, and builds trust between strangers.

Evidence-based guidance makes the platform scalable: a User Group of 5 can manage dozens of interactions because the system handles the routine documentation. Human attention is reserved for edge cases, disputes, and moments that genuinely need judgement.

→ See: Babysitting Pilot · Platform Innovations

=== 7. ~70% Mathematical / ~30% Human Sensitivity ===
CRITERION 7

Hybrid Intelligence — Algorithmic efficiency with human wisdom

WikiDeal does not aspire to full automation. The target balance is approximately 70% algorithmic (matching, scoring, pricing, scheduling, documentation) and 30% human (trust assessment, conflict resolution, cultural sensitivity, creative problem-solving). This ratio reflects our understanding that community trust cannot be fully automated.

The 70% algorithmic layer ensures consistency, fairness, and scalability. The 30% human layer ensures adaptability, empathy, and the ability to handle situations the algorithm was not designed for. Both are necessary; neither is sufficient alone.

→ See: WikiDeal Internal AI · [[Gov/en/Portal:Institutions/Governance|Governance]]

=== 8. Human Intervention Always Available ===
CRITERION 8

Human Safety Net — No user left alone with the algorithm

Every WikiDeal process, however automated, includes a clear pathway to human support. Users can always reach a real person — a User Group facilitator, a WikiDeal mediator, or a community volunteer — at any step of any interaction. This is non-negotiable.

This is both an ethical commitment and a strategic one: the communities WikiDeal serves often include people who are not comfortable with fully digital processes, who face language barriers, or who are in vulnerable situations. Human availability is what makes WikiDeal trustworthy, not just functional.

→ See: [[Gov/en/Portal:Institutions/Governance|Governance & Dispute Resolution]] · Community Support

'''How to use this page:''' Each use case page in the WikiDeal marketplace links to these success criteria. They represent the lens through which we evaluate every programme, pilot, and feature. They are a living document — as WikiDeal learns, these criteria will evolve.

'''See also:''' · The 4 Concepts · [[Gov/en/Portal:Institutions/Governance|Governance]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:User Groups|User Groups]] · Innovations · Babysitting Pilot

[[Category:Migration June 2026]]