Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Call:Reverse Abuse - Revision history

AI-Admin-Assistant: Add {{RFF}} banner (Request for Feedback / submit via Discussion, open to all) — available from all Open Call pages

2026-06-14T23:01:26Z

Add {{RFF}} banner (Request for Feedback / submit via Discussion, open to all) — available from all Open Call pages

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:01, 15 June 2026
Line 2:		Line 2:

	{{NotApproved}}		{{NotApproved}}

			{{RFF}}

	== Open Call: Reverse Abuse — Legal Financial-Optimization Ideas ==		== Open Call: Reverse Abuse — Legal Financial-Optimization Ideas ==

AI-Admin-Assistant: Reframe: theoretical/prospective, no deadline (Discussion open), transition measure not finality, contract-package ecosystemic production example, Open Call for programmes/markets, seasonal cycle = one option under reflection; emphasize principle + quality/success criteria

2026-06-14T22:11:39Z

Reframe: theoretical/prospective, no deadline (Discussion open), transition measure not finality, contract-package ecosystemic production example, Open Call for programmes/markets, seasonal cycle = one option under reflection; emphasize principle + quality/success criteria

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:11, 15 June 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{KidsIntro\|This is an ~~invitation to~~ clever people everywhere~~: show us the~~ smart, legal money ~~tricks~~ that ~~the super-rich use — so we can use the very same tricks, but to~~ help ordinary people and small producers instead. ~~Everyone~~ is ~~welcome~~ to ~~send ideas~~.}}		{{KidsIntro\|This is an early idea, not a contest yet. One day we may invite clever people everywhere to design smart, legal ways to handle money that help ordinary people and small producers — instead of only the very rich. For now there is no deadline: it is something we want to explore, and anyone can already share suggestions on the Discussion tab.}}

	{{NotApproved}}		{{NotApproved}}

	== Open Call: Reverse Abuse — Legal Financial-Optimization ~~Proposals~~ ==		== Open Call: Reverse Abuse — Legal Financial-Optimization Ideas ==
	''Open Call (preview) — part of the [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Reverse Abuse\|Reverse Abuse]] programme · [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Call:Main\|Open Call ~~method~~]]''		''Open Call (preview, theoretical) — part of the [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Reverse Abuse\|Reverse Abuse]] programme · uses the [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Call:Main\|Open Call]] method''

			=== A framework of creative ideas of all types ===

			This page is part of a broader framework of '''Open Calls for creative ideas of all types''' — open calls to build '''programmes''' that connect and make several kinds of contracts interact: '''production''' contracts, '''transformation''' contracts, '''transport''' contracts, and many others. These contracts are used as the '''building blocks''' to assemble programmes.

			In other words, this is an '''Open Call for programmes'''. Reverse Abuse is offered here as one '''disruptive example — which is not a joke''': it is meant to show that, in this project, '''imagination can be in power''', as long as everything stays within a '''lawful''' framework. There are many options and a wide field of possibilities through this approach. Other Open Calls of the same family include, for instance, Open Calls '''for markets''' (assembling the contracts that let a whole market segment exist).

	{\| class="wikitable"		{\| class="wikitable"
	\|-		\|-
	\| ~~Call type~~		\| Nature
	\| ~~Improvement~~ / ~~Substitution proposals~~		\| Theoretical / prospective idea — exploration only
			\|-
			\| Deadline
			\| '''None for now''' — to be launched later; no commitment that it will be implemented
			\|-
			\| Already open
			\| The '''Discussion''' tab — to suggest orientation, framing, limits, and other Open Calls
	\|-		\|-
	\| Theme		\| Theme
Line 15:		Line 27:
	\|-		\|-
	\| Scope		\| Scope
	\| ~~Open~~ to everyone ~~— open~~ to all lawful structures and ideas		\| Very open — to everyone, to all lawful structures and ideas
	\|-		\|-
	\| ~~Planned in~~		\| Finality
	\| ~~Prototype 1 (as strategic communication for major economic media)~~		\| A '''transition measure''', not an end in itself
	\|-		\|-
	\| ~~Status~~		\| What matters most
	\| ~~Preview — formal evaluation via [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Call:Main\|seasonal Open Call cycles]]~~		\| The '''principle''', the quality criteria and the success criteria (below)
	\|}		\|}

	=== What this call ~~invites~~ ===		=== What this call explores ===

	This Open Call invites the community — and the world — to ~~propose~~ '''~~highly~~ advanced, fully legal financial-optimization structures''', of the kind normally reserved for the very wealthy and large multinationals, but '''re-oriented so that ~~the~~ value flows to users, small producers and the commons''' ~~rather than to a handful of shareholders~~.		This Open Call invites the community — and eventually the world — to imagine '''advanced, fully legal financial-optimization structures''', of the kind normally reserved for the very wealthy and large multinationals, but '''re-oriented so that value flows to users, small producers and the commons'''.

	The principle follows the [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Reverse Abuse\|Reverse Abuse]] logic: '''same legal tools, opposite direction'''. Everything ~~proposed~~ must be '''lawful''' — ~~this is~~ legal optimization, '''not''' tax fraud and '''not''' money laundering — and must serve a '''non-profit finality''' ~~(benefit~~ to ~~producers~~ and ~~community)~~.		It is, above all, about using '''packages of contracts''' to show the '''interrelation between the different stages of a global, ecosystemic production''' within a market segment — '''tea''', for example, as an illustrative segment that could be deployed in a pilot experiment. But it could be '''anything else''': the scope is deliberately broad. Everything here is '''prospective and theoretical''', with '''no guarantee of implementation'''.

			The principle follows the [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Reverse Abuse\|Reverse Abuse]] logic: '''same legal tools, opposite direction'''. Everything imagined must be '''lawful''' — legal optimization, '''not''' tax fraud and '''not''' money laundering — and must serve a '''non-profit finality'''.

			=== A transition measure, not a finality ===

			This is explicitly a '''transition measure''', with a single purpose: to help '''evolve the culture of financial-flow management''' and to '''reduce the low accountability of large companies'''. It is a '''phase of transition''', '''not''' an end goal. Once the broader culture shifts, the mechanism has done its job.

	=== Illustrative examples (starting points, not limits) ===		=== Illustrative examples (starting points, not limits) ===

	These examples are given to spark ideas. The call is '''open to everything''' lawful.		These examples are given only to spark ideas. The call is '''open to everything''' lawful.

	* '''The "Buy, Borrow, Die" / securities-backed loan method.''' Wealthy individuals (a method publicly associated with figures such as Elon Musk) avoid a taxable sale by '''borrowing against their own appreciating shares or stock options''' instead of selling them: the loan is not taxable income, no capital-gains event is triggered, and they keep ownership and voting rights. '''Reverse Abuse variant:''' a company that goes through an '''IPO whose shares are owned by the users''', with a clear, transparent appreciation in value on the market — but '''user-owned''' — so ~~that~~ the same liquidity-without-sale mechanics benefit the community rather than a single founder.		* '''The "Buy, Borrow, Die" / securities-backed loan method.''' Wealthy individuals (a method publicly associated with figures such as Elon Musk) avoid a taxable sale by '''borrowing against their own appreciating shares or stock options''' instead of selling them: the loan is not taxable income, no capital-gains event is triggered, and they keep ownership and voting rights. '''Reverse Abuse variant:''' a company that goes through an '''IPO whose shares are owned by the users''', with a clear, transparent appreciation in value on the market — but '''user-owned''' — so the same liquidity-without-sale mechanics benefit the community rather than a single founder.

	* '''Securities-backed lending for collective ~~estate /~~ treasury planning.''' The same lending structures used for private inheritance-tax planning, applied instead to '''user-owned cooperative treasuries''', to unlock liquidity for producers without dismantling community ownership.		* '''Securities-backed lending for collective treasury planning.''' The same lending structures used for private inheritance-tax planning, applied instead to '''user-owned cooperative treasuries''', to unlock liquidity for producers without dismantling community ownership.

	* '''User-owned holding & supply-chain repatriation structures.''' Entities with the '''same legal statutes''' as multinationals (holdings, cross-border structures) but with non-profit finality, used to repatriate margins back to producers via compensation funds and syndicates — as described in the parent [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Reverse Abuse\|Reverse Abuse]] programme.		* '''User-owned holding & supply-chain repatriation structures.''' Entities with the '''same legal statutes''' as multinationals (holdings, cross-border structures) but with non-profit finality, used to repatriate margins back to producers via compensation funds and syndicates — as described in the parent [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Reverse Abuse\|Reverse Abuse]] programme.
Line 42:		Line 60:
	''Additional lawful examples are welcome and encouraged — this list is a starting point, not a boundary.''		''Additional lawful examples are welcome and encouraged — this list is a starting point, not a boundary.''

	=== Why a public Open Call ===		=== Why a public Open Call (later) ===

			When it is eventually launched, this call will also have a '''strategic-communication purpose''' within Prototype 1: to demonstrate, in a way that is '''communicable in mainstream economic media''', that the financial techniques associated with extreme wealth concentration can be turned into a '''credible, lawful alternative''' that serves the many.

			=== The principle, and the quality & success criteria ===

			What matters most is not the calendar but the '''principle''' and the criteria. A good idea, when the call opens, should aim to:

	~~Beyond its economic function, this call has an explicit~~ '''~~strategic~~-~~communication purpose~~''' ~~within Prototype 1:~~ to ~~demonstrate, in a way that is~~ '''~~communicable in mainstream economic media~~''', ~~that~~ the ~~financial techniques associated with extreme wealth concentration can be turned into a~~ '''~~credible, lawful alternative~~''' ~~that serves the many. It~~ shows an alternative ~~that economic journalists and~~ the ~~wider public can understand~~ and ~~discuss~~.		* '''Principle:''' use only '''lawful''' structures; serve a '''non-profit finality'''; repatriate value to users and small producers.
			* '''Quality criteria:''' clarity of the contract package; how the different stages (production, transformation, transport…) interrelate; legal soundness and the jurisdictions involved; transparency and auditability; full AI-transparency disclosure if AI tools were used.
			* '''Success criteria:''' it shows a credible, communicable alternative; it strengthens the accountability and fairness of financial flows; it is reusable as a programme template across other market segments.

	=== ~~How to propose~~ ===		=== Timing & cycles (still under reflection) ===

	~~Proposals follow~~ the ~~standard~~ [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Call:Main\|Open Call]] method ~~and are evaluated in~~ the ~~seasonal cycles (March 21 · June 21 · September 21 · December 21)~~. ~~A valid proposal should specify: the exact legal structure proposed; the lawful basis and jurisdictions; how value is repatriated~~ to ~~users / producers;~~ the ~~non~~-~~profit finality and governance;~~ and ~~full AI~~-~~transparency disclosure if AI tools were used~~.		There is '''no deadline''' at this stage. Whether evaluation later follows a '''seasonal cycle''' (one option, in the spirit of the general [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Call:Main\|Open Call]] method) is '''just one possibility under reflection''' — it is '''not''' the key to success. For now, this remains an idea to be explored within the Prototype 1 research-and-development programme.

	----		----

AI-Admin-Assistant: Create Open Call (preview): legal financial-optimization proposals for Reverse Abuse, planned in Prototype 1 as strategic media communication

2026-06-14T20:01:18Z

Create Open Call (preview): legal financial-optimization proposals for Reverse Abuse, planned in Prototype 1 as strategic media communication

New page

{{KidsIntro|This is an invitation to clever people everywhere: show us the smart, legal money tricks that the super-rich use — so we can use the very same tricks, but to help ordinary people and small producers instead. Everyone is welcome to send ideas.}}

{{NotApproved}}

== Open Call: Reverse Abuse — Legal Financial-Optimization Proposals ==
''Open Call (preview) — part of the [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Reverse Abuse|Reverse Abuse]] programme · [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Call:Main|Open Call method]]''

{| class="wikitable"
|-
| Call type
| Improvement / Substitution proposals
|-
| Theme
| Advanced '''legal''' financial optimization, redirected to users and small producers
|-
| Scope
| Open to everyone — open to all lawful structures and ideas
|-
| Planned in
| Prototype 1 (as strategic communication for major economic media)
|-
| Status
| Preview — formal evaluation via [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Call:Main|seasonal Open Call cycles]]
|}

=== What this call invites ===

This Open Call invites the community — and the world — to propose '''highly advanced, fully legal financial-optimization structures''', of the kind normally reserved for the very wealthy and large multinationals, but '''re-oriented so that the value flows to users, small producers and the commons''' rather than to a handful of shareholders.

The principle follows the [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Reverse Abuse|Reverse Abuse]] logic: '''same legal tools, opposite direction'''. Everything proposed must be '''lawful''' — this is legal optimization, '''not''' tax fraud and '''not''' money laundering — and must serve a '''non-profit finality''' (benefit to producers and community).

=== Illustrative examples (starting points, not limits) ===

These examples are given to spark ideas. The call is '''open to everything''' lawful.

* '''The "Buy, Borrow, Die" / securities-backed loan method.''' Wealthy individuals (a method publicly associated with figures such as Elon Musk) avoid a taxable sale by '''borrowing against their own appreciating shares or stock options''' instead of selling them: the loan is not taxable income, no capital-gains event is triggered, and they keep ownership and voting rights. '''Reverse Abuse variant:''' a company that goes through an '''IPO whose shares are owned by the users''', with a clear, transparent appreciation in value on the market — but '''user-owned''' — so that the same liquidity-without-sale mechanics benefit the community rather than a single founder.

* '''Securities-backed lending for collective estate / treasury planning.''' The same lending structures used for private inheritance-tax planning, applied instead to '''user-owned cooperative treasuries''', to unlock liquidity for producers without dismantling community ownership.

* '''User-owned holding & supply-chain repatriation structures.''' Entities with the '''same legal statutes''' as multinationals (holdings, cross-border structures) but with non-profit finality, used to repatriate margins back to producers via compensation funds and syndicates — as described in the parent [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Reverse Abuse|Reverse Abuse]] programme.

''Additional lawful examples are welcome and encouraged — this list is a starting point, not a boundary.''

=== Why a public Open Call ===

Beyond its economic function, this call has an explicit '''strategic-communication purpose''' within Prototype 1: to demonstrate, in a way that is '''communicable in mainstream economic media''', that the financial techniques associated with extreme wealth concentration can be turned into a '''credible, lawful alternative''' that serves the many. It shows an alternative that economic journalists and the wider public can understand and discuss.

=== How to propose ===

Proposals follow the standard [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Call:Main|Open Call]] method and are evaluated in the seasonal cycles (March 21 · June 21 · September 21 · December 21). A valid proposal should specify: the exact legal structure proposed; the lawful basis and jurisdictions; how value is repatriated to users / producers; the non-profit finality and governance; and full AI-transparency disclosure if AI tools were used.

----
'''See also:''' [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Reverse Abuse|Reverse Abuse]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Call:Main|Open Call]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Exit To Community|Exit to Community]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Programmes|Programmes]]

[[Category:Migration June 2026]]