AI-Admin-Assistant: New page: naming reflection subscription vs membership (basis for discussion)

2026-07-07T04:52:20Z

New page: naming reflection subscription vs membership (basis for discussion)

New page

{{KidsIntro|WikiDeal had to choose a word for the small amount of money people pay to use the platform. "Subscription" sounds easy and open, like a magazine or a bus pass. "Membership" sounds like joining a club, which some people love and some people find heavy. WikiDeal picked "subscription" because it feels open to everyone, but people who subscribe really would become members too, with a right to vote.}}

{{ExpertIntro|Naming reflection page, proposed as a basis for discussion. Subscription and membership are presented as two sides of the same coin: in the intended model, subscribers would in fact be members with voting rights (1 user = 1 vote). "Membership" often suffers from a perception of heaviness (time, complicated democracy, obligations), while the obligations envisaged here would be minimal (participation messages and the civic incentive). "Subscription" is more general and inclusive, but less transparent about the intention to build a strong community. Initial hypothesis: "subscription" was chosen for inclusiveness, while recognizing that it is a subscription for a membership.}}

__TOC__

= Subscription or membership? =

''This page documents the reflection behind a naming choice. It is proposed as a basis for discussion, not as a settled truth.''


== Two sides of the same coin ==

Subscription and membership are two sides of the same coin. In the model being explored, the people who subscribe ''are'' members: subscribing would come with a right to vote, following the [[Gov/en/Portal:Voting/Main|1 user = 1 vote]] principle. The question is therefore not what subscribers would get, but which word describes it best.


== The perception problem of "membership" ==

The word "membership" often suffers from a negative perception: the impression that it will take time, that democracy is complicated, and that it implies obligations.

In reality, the obligations envisaged here would be minimal:

* receiving messages that stimulate participation;
* accepting the [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Civic-Incentive|civic incentive]], meaning slightly better prices for the people who participate.

Nothing else special would be asked of members.


== Strengths and limits of each term ==

* '''Subscription''' is more general, encompassing and inclusive. Its limit: it is less transparent about the intention to create a strong community.
* '''Membership''' is more transparent about the community intention. Its limit: it can generate a feeling of rejection among people who do not want to "be part of" something and hold on to their independence.


== The choice made (initial hypothesis) ==

In order to be as encompassing as possible, the term "subscription" was chosen, while recognizing that what is proposed is a "subscription for a membership".

Beyond the play on words, these are questions of perception: it is considered more important to integrate and include people than to be rigid about exact terms.

== See also ==

* [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Subscription|The Subscription Model]] (the page this reflection belongs to)
* [[Gov/en/Portal:Voting/Main|Voting portal]] (the 1 user = 1 vote principle)
* [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Civic-Incentive|Civic Incentive]]

💡 '''Improve this concept:''' submit a proposal via [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Call:Main|Open Call]]
[[Category:Migration June 2026]]

Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Subscription-or-Membership - Revision history

AI-Admin-Assistant: New page: naming reflection subscription vs membership (basis for discussion)