Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Need-Driven Funding - Revision history

AI-Admin-Assistant: Merged into Economy/Need-Driven-Funding (single page, URL preserved via redirect) — per Théo 2026-08-18

2026-08-18T21:14:38Z

Merged into Economy/Need-Driven-Funding (single page, URL preserved via redirect) — per Théo 2026-08-18

AI-Admin-Assistant: Need gauge: CHF 12,000/month retained as base hypothesis (will evolve) + link to draft Open Call on NDF criteria — per Théo 2026-08-18

2026-08-18T18:36:37Z

Need gauge: CHF 12,000/month retained as base hypothesis (will evolve) + link to draft Open Call on NDF criteria — per Théo 2026-08-18

AI-Admin-Assistant: Rewrite: single Reward type, slider/community-personal distinction removed — per Théo 2026-08-18

2026-08-18T18:23:09Z

Rewrite: single Reward type, slider/community-personal distinction removed — per Théo 2026-08-18

Show changes

AI-Admin-Assistant: Standardise manual summary: On this page list wrapped in Template:ArticleSummary, same entries (Theo 2026-08-17)

2026-08-17T17:26:32Z

Standardise manual summary: On this page list wrapped in Template:ArticleSummary, same entries (Theo 2026-08-17)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:26, 17 August 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{KidsIntro\|The Need-Driven Funding is a tool that keeps money flowing in a steady, fair way. It smooths out the ups and downs so the platform always has enough support to keep going, like a savings jar that balances good months and slow months.}}		{{KidsIntro\|The Need-Driven Funding is a tool that keeps money flowing in a steady, fair way. It smooths out the ups and downs so the platform always has enough support to keep going, like a savings jar that balances good months and slow months.}}
	{{ExpertIntro\|Need-Driven Funding acts as a reward ratio regulation: a second algorithm, separate from the bonding curve, that adjusts rewards to the real needs of the platform. When needs are low, the corresponding share would feed a provision fund intended to be managed by the Ynternet.org Foundation; when needs are high, the reward would be higher. The funding starts at zero or in negative territory (founders invest before the call for funding), measured by the funding cost ratio. Non-speculative, donation-based, transparent.}}		{{ExpertIntro\|Need-Driven Funding acts as a reward ratio regulation: a second algorithm, separate from the bonding curve, that adjusts rewards to the real needs of the platform. When needs are low, the corresponding share would feed a provision fund intended to be managed by the Ynternet.org Foundation; when needs are high, the reward would be higher. The funding starts at zero or in negative territory (founders invest before the call for funding), measured by the funding cost ratio. Non-speculative, donation-based, transparent.}}
	~~'''On this page:'''~~		{{ArticleSummary\|
	* [[#what-is-it\|What is it?]]		* [[#what-is-it\|What is it?]]
	* [[#negative-start\|Starting at zero or in negative territory]]		* [[#negative-start\|Starting at zero or in negative territory]]
Line 9:		Line 9:
	* [[#relationships\|Relationship to other mechanisms]]		* [[#relationships\|Relationship to other mechanisms]]
	* [[#state-of-the-art\|State of the art]]		* [[#state-of-the-art\|State of the art]]
			}}
	__NOTOC__		__NOTOC__

AI-Admin-Assistant: Visible in-content table of contents (Theo 2026-08-15)

2026-08-15T17:28:19Z

Visible in-content table of contents (Theo 2026-08-15)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:28, 15 August 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{KidsIntro\|The Need-Driven Funding is a tool that keeps money flowing in a steady, fair way. It smooths out the ups and downs so the platform always has enough support to keep going, like a savings jar that balances good months and slow months.}}		{{KidsIntro\|The Need-Driven Funding is a tool that keeps money flowing in a steady, fair way. It smooths out the ups and downs so the platform always has enough support to keep going, like a savings jar that balances good months and slow months.}}
	{{ExpertIntro\|Need-Driven Funding acts as a reward ratio regulation: a second algorithm, separate from the bonding curve, that adjusts rewards to the real needs of the platform. When needs are low, the corresponding share would feed a provision fund intended to be managed by the Ynternet.org Foundation; when needs are high, the reward would be higher. The funding starts at zero or in negative territory (founders invest before the call for funding), measured by the funding cost ratio. Non-speculative, donation-based, transparent.}}		{{ExpertIntro\|Need-Driven Funding acts as a reward ratio regulation: a second algorithm, separate from the bonding curve, that adjusts rewards to the real needs of the platform. When needs are low, the corresponding share would feed a provision fund intended to be managed by the Ynternet.org Foundation; when needs are high, the reward would be higher. The funding starts at zero or in negative territory (founders invest before the call for funding), measured by the funding cost ratio. Non-speculative, donation-based, transparent.}}
	~~__TOC__~~		'''On this page:'''
			* [[#what-is-it\|What is it?]]
			* [[#negative-start\|Starting at zero or in negative territory]]
			* [[#illustrative-example\|An illustrative example]]
			* [[#how-it-works\|How it works]]
			* [[#principles\|Principles]]
			* [[#relationships\|Relationship to other mechanisms]]
			* [[#state-of-the-art\|State of the art]]
			__NOTOC__

	= Need-Driven Funding =		= Need-Driven Funding =

AI-Admin-Assistant: Rename section to State of the art (Theo 2026-08-15)

2026-08-15T15:59:08Z

Rename section to State of the art (Theo 2026-08-15)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:59, 15 August 2026
Line 89:		Line 89:
	----		----

	<span id="~~related~~-~~research~~"></span>		<span id="state-of-the-art"></span>
	== ~~Related scientific research~~ ==		== State of the art ==
	Adjusting rewards to the real needs of a shared platform relates to the economics of clubs, nonprofit enterprise and threshold funding mechanisms. The references below situate this invention in existing research.		Adjusting rewards to the real needs of a shared platform relates to the economics of clubs, nonprofit enterprise and threshold funding mechanisms. The references below situate this invention in existing research.

AI-Admin-Assistant: Add Related scientific research section (Theo 2026-08-15)

2026-08-15T15:45:35Z

Add Related scientific research section (Theo 2026-08-15)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:45, 15 August 2026
Line 88:		Line 88:

	----		----

			<span id="related-research"></span>
			== Related scientific research ==
			Adjusting rewards to the real needs of a shared platform relates to the economics of clubs, nonprofit enterprise and threshold funding mechanisms. The references below situate this invention in existing research.

			* James M. Buchanan (1965), ''An Economic Theory of Clubs'', Economica, 32(125): [https://doi.org/10.2307/2552442 doi:10.2307/2552442] · [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Club_good club good on Wikipedia].
			* Henry Hansmann (1980), ''The Role of Nonprofit Enterprise'', Yale Law Journal, 89(5): [https://doi.org/10.2307/796089 doi:10.2307/796089].
			* Alexander Tabarrok (1998), ''The private provision of public goods via dominant assurance contracts'', Public Choice, 96: [https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004957109535 doi:10.1023/A:1004957109535] · [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assurance_contract assurance contract on Wikipedia].
			* Ethan Mollick (2014), ''The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study'', Journal of Business Venturing, 29(1), on threshold (all-or-nothing) funding: [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.06.005 doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.06.005].
			* René Bekkers and Pamala Wiepking (2011), ''A Literature Review of Empirical Studies of Philanthropy: Eight Mechanisms That Drive Charitable Giving'', Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(5): [https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764010380927 doi:10.1177/0899764010380927].

	'''See also:''' [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Bonding Curve\|Bonding Curve]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Rewards\|Rewards]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Karma-Tokens\|Karma tokens]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Subscriptions\|Subscription Model]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Main\|All innovations]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Calls:Main\|Open Calls]]		'''See also:''' [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Bonding Curve\|Bonding Curve]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Rewards\|Rewards]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Karma-Tokens\|Karma tokens]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Subscriptions\|Subscription Model]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Main\|All innovations]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Calls:Main\|Open Calls]]

AI-Admin-Assistant: Rename Open Call to Open Calls; remove reputation credits (Theo 2026-08-03)

2026-08-03T19:49:46Z

Rename Open Call to Open Calls; remove reputation credits (Theo 2026-08-03)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:49, 3 August 2026
Line 72:		Line 72:

	* Non-speculative: the ratio changes based on real needs, not market sentiment.		* Non-speculative: the ratio changes based on real needs, not market sentiment.
	* Transparent: the formula is intended to be published, auditable, and subject to [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-~~Call~~:Main\|Open Call]] review.		* Transparent: the formula is intended to be published, auditable, and subject to [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Calls:Main\|Open Call]] review.
	* At-cost: no extraction beyond what the platform needs to operate.		* At-cost: no extraction beyond what the platform needs to operate.
	* Community-first: community utility is built before personal returns are maximized.		* Community-first: community utility is built before personal returns are maximized.
Line 88:		Line 88:

	----		----
	'''See also:''' [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Bonding Curve\|Bonding Curve]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Rewards\|Rewards]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Karma-Tokens\|Karma tokens]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Subscriptions\|Subscription Model]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Main\|All innovations]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-~~Call~~:Main\|Open Calls]]		'''See also:''' [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Bonding Curve\|Bonding Curve]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Rewards\|Rewards]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Karma-Tokens\|Karma tokens]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Subscriptions\|Subscription Model]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Main\|All innovations]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Calls:Main\|Open Calls]]

	[[Category:Migration June 2026]]		[[Category:Migration June 2026]]
	[[Category:Innovation]]		[[Category:Innovation]]
	<!-- visible -->		<!-- visible -->

AI-Admin-Assistant: Rewards vocabulary: umbrella term Credits renamed to Rewards (Theo 2026-08-03)

2026-08-03T06:58:29Z

Rewards vocabulary: umbrella term Credits renamed to Rewards (Theo 2026-08-03)

AI-Admin-Assistant: Add Category:Innovation

2026-07-22T15:57:23Z

Add Category:Innovation

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:57, 22 July 2026
Line 91:		Line 91:

	[[Category:Migration June 2026]]		[[Category:Migration June 2026]]
			[[Category:Innovation]]
	<!-- visible -->		<!-- visible -->

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:26, 17 August 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{KidsIntro\|The Need-Driven Funding is a tool that keeps money flowing in a steady, fair way. It smooths out the ups and downs so the platform always has enough support to keep going, like a savings jar that balances good months and slow months.}}		{{KidsIntro\|The Need-Driven Funding is a tool that keeps money flowing in a steady, fair way. It smooths out the ups and downs so the platform always has enough support to keep going, like a savings jar that balances good months and slow months.}}
	{{ExpertIntro\|Need-Driven Funding acts as a reward ratio regulation: a second algorithm, separate from the bonding curve, that adjusts rewards to the real needs of the platform. When needs are low, the corresponding share would feed a provision fund intended to be managed by the Ynternet.org Foundation; when needs are high, the reward would be higher. The funding starts at zero or in negative territory (founders invest before the call for funding), measured by the funding cost ratio. Non-speculative, donation-based, transparent.}}		{{ExpertIntro\|Need-Driven Funding acts as a reward ratio regulation: a second algorithm, separate from the bonding curve, that adjusts rewards to the real needs of the platform. When needs are low, the corresponding share would feed a provision fund intended to be managed by the Ynternet.org Foundation; when needs are high, the reward would be higher. The funding starts at zero or in negative territory (founders invest before the call for funding), measured by the funding cost ratio. Non-speculative, donation-based, transparent.}}
	~~'''On this page:'''~~		{{ArticleSummary\|
	* [[#what-is-it\|What is it?]]		* [[#what-is-it\|What is it?]]
	* [[#negative-start\|Starting at zero or in negative territory]]		* [[#negative-start\|Starting at zero or in negative territory]]
Line 9:		Line 9:
	* [[#relationships\|Relationship to other mechanisms]]		* [[#relationships\|Relationship to other mechanisms]]
	* [[#state-of-the-art\|State of the art]]		* [[#state-of-the-art\|State of the art]]
			}}
	__NOTOC__		__NOTOC__

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:28, 15 August 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{KidsIntro\|The Need-Driven Funding is a tool that keeps money flowing in a steady, fair way. It smooths out the ups and downs so the platform always has enough support to keep going, like a savings jar that balances good months and slow months.}}		{{KidsIntro\|The Need-Driven Funding is a tool that keeps money flowing in a steady, fair way. It smooths out the ups and downs so the platform always has enough support to keep going, like a savings jar that balances good months and slow months.}}
	{{ExpertIntro\|Need-Driven Funding acts as a reward ratio regulation: a second algorithm, separate from the bonding curve, that adjusts rewards to the real needs of the platform. When needs are low, the corresponding share would feed a provision fund intended to be managed by the Ynternet.org Foundation; when needs are high, the reward would be higher. The funding starts at zero or in negative territory (founders invest before the call for funding), measured by the funding cost ratio. Non-speculative, donation-based, transparent.}}		{{ExpertIntro\|Need-Driven Funding acts as a reward ratio regulation: a second algorithm, separate from the bonding curve, that adjusts rewards to the real needs of the platform. When needs are low, the corresponding share would feed a provision fund intended to be managed by the Ynternet.org Foundation; when needs are high, the reward would be higher. The funding starts at zero or in negative territory (founders invest before the call for funding), measured by the funding cost ratio. Non-speculative, donation-based, transparent.}}
	~~__TOC__~~		'''On this page:'''
			* [[#what-is-it\|What is it?]]
			* [[#negative-start\|Starting at zero or in negative territory]]
			* [[#illustrative-example\|An illustrative example]]
			* [[#how-it-works\|How it works]]
			* [[#principles\|Principles]]
			* [[#relationships\|Relationship to other mechanisms]]
			* [[#state-of-the-art\|State of the art]]
			__NOTOC__

	= Need-Driven Funding =		= Need-Driven Funding =

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:36, 18 August 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{KidsIntro\|Need-Driven Funding is a rule of honesty: WikiDeal first says how much money it really needs to run, like a family writing its monthly budget on the fridge. Donations follow that real need, and each donor freely chooses how many of their thank-you Rewards they keep and how much they simply give to the project.}}		{{KidsIntro\|Need-Driven Funding is a rule of honesty: WikiDeal first says how much money it really needs to run, like a family writing its monthly budget on the fridge. Donations follow that real need, and each donor freely chooses how many of their thank-you Rewards they keep and how much they simply give to the project.}}
	{{ExpertIntro\|Need-Driven Funding is currently proposed as the mechanism that aligns funding with the Ynternet.org Foundation's declared needs. The Foundation publishes a need gauge (an initial requirement plus a variable functioning cost, for example CHF 10,000 per month, adjustable); the effective Reward multiplier would follow that declared need. At donation time, each donor freely chooses how many of the generated Rewards they keep and how much they leave to the project as pure support. The funding starts at zero or in negative territory (founders invest before the call for funding). Non-speculative, donation-based, transparent.}}		{{ExpertIntro\|Need-Driven Funding is currently proposed as the mechanism that aligns funding with the Ynternet.org Foundation's declared needs. The Foundation publishes a need gauge (an initial requirement plus a variable functioning cost, for example CHF 12,000 per month (the base hypothesis currently retained, intended to evolve), adjustable); the effective Reward multiplier would follow that declared need. At donation time, each donor freely chooses how many of the generated Rewards they keep and how much they leave to the project as pure support. The funding starts at zero or in negative territory (founders invest before the call for funding). Non-speculative, donation-based, transparent.}}
	{{ArticleSummary\|		{{ArticleSummary\|
	* [[#what-is-it\|What is it?]]		* [[#what-is-it\|What is it?]]
Line 44:		Line 44:
	Need-Driven Funding is a second algorithm, entirely separate from the [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Bonding Curve\|bonding curve]], that aims at one thing: '''funding follows the real, declared needs of the platform''', not market forces. It is intended to be non-speculative and transparent, and it currently rests on two building blocks, proposed as a basis for discussion:		Need-Driven Funding is a second algorithm, entirely separate from the [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Bonding Curve\|bonding curve]], that aims at one thing: '''funding follows the real, declared needs of the platform''', not market forces. It is intended to be non-speculative and transparent, and it currently rests on two building blocks, proposed as a basis for discussion:

	* '''The need gauge.''' The Ynternet.org Foundation would declare its real need publicly: an initial requirement plus a variable functioning cost (for example CHF 10,000 per month, set at launch and adjustable). While this declared need is not covered, donations would carry the full multiplier of the bonding curve; once the need is covered and a provision builds up, the effective multiplier would decrease, and the difference would feed a '''provision fund''' intended to be managed by the Ynternet.org Foundation, for the maintenance and development of WikiDeal.		* '''The need gauge.''' The Ynternet.org Foundation would declare its real need publicly: an initial requirement plus a variable functioning cost (for example CHF 12,000 per month, set at launch and adjustable). While this declared need is not covered, donations would carry the full multiplier of the bonding curve; once the need is covered and a provision builds up, the effective multiplier would decrease, and the difference would feed a '''provision fund''' intended to be managed by the Ynternet.org Foundation, for the maintenance and development of WikiDeal.
	* '''The donor's free choice.''' At donation time, the donor sees how many [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Rewards\|Rewards]] their donation generates, and simply chooses how many of those Rewards they '''keep''' and how much they '''leave to the project''' as pure support. Simple formulas are currently proposed to make this choice easy, from keeping nothing to keeping the maximum: see the [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Rewards-FAQ\|Rewards FAQ]].		* '''The donor's free choice.''' At donation time, the donor sees how many [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Rewards\|Rewards]] their donation generates, and simply chooses how many of those Rewards they '''keep''' and how much they '''leave to the project''' as pure support. Simple formulas are currently proposed to make this choice easy, from keeping nothing to keeping the maximum: see the [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Rewards-FAQ\|Rewards FAQ]].

Line 61:		Line 61:
	The variables matter more than the figures: all figures below are placeholders, and contributions remain non-speculative donations.		The variables matter more than the figures: all figures below are placeholders, and contributions remain non-speculative donations.

	* About CHF 100,000 invested before the call for funding (the initial requirement), plus a functioning variable of about CHF 10,000 per month of operating costs (salaries, servers, steering committee meetings).		* About CHF 100,000 invested before the call for funding (the initial requirement), plus a functioning variable of about CHF 12,000 per month of operating costs (salaries, servers, steering committee meetings).
	* After 6 months: CHF 100,000 + 6 x 10,000 = '''CHF ~~160~~,000''' raised would bring the declared need below 100 percent.		* After 6 months: CHF 100,000 + 6 x 12,000 = '''CHF 172,000''' raised would bring the declared need below 100 percent.
	* After 12 months: '''CHF ~~220~~,000''' raised would mean the initial CHF 100,000 covered and 12 months of costs covered.		* After 12 months: '''CHF 244,000''' raised would mean the initial CHF 100,000 covered and 12 months of costs covered.
	* The variables are the monthly amount (here 10,000) and the number of months of provision wanted (typically 3): a provision target of 3 x 10,000 = '''CHF 30,000'''.		* The variables are the monthly amount (here 12,000) and the number of months of provision wanted (typically 3): a provision target of 3 x 12,000 = '''CHF 36,000'''. The criteria themselves (what counts as the real need, which costs are incompressible and which are reducible, such as Open Call budgets) are proposed for study in a draft [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Calls:Need-Driven-Funding-Criteria\|wave 2 Open Call]].
	* On a funding curve where the multiplier is blocked at x100 for the first CHF 200,000 raised (out of a CHF 1,000,000 target), then declines towards x30: once the declared need is covered, the difference between the multiplier promised by the curve and the effective reward attributed would benefit the provision fund of the Ynternet.org Foundation.		* On a funding curve where the multiplier is blocked at x100 for the first CHF 200,000 raised (out of a CHF 1,000,000 target), then declines towards x30: once the declared need is covered, the difference between the multiplier promised by the curve and the effective reward attributed would benefit the provision fund of the Ynternet.org Foundation.

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:58, 3 August 2026
Line 38:		Line 38:
	* When needs are '''high''', the reward would be higher.		* When needs are '''high''', the reward would be higher.

	The mechanism is not about maximizing returns: it is about aligning ~~Credit~~ distribution with what the platform actually needs at each stage of growth.		The mechanism is not about maximizing returns: it is about aligning Reward distribution with what the platform actually needs at each stage of growth.

	<span id="negative-start"></span>		<span id="negative-start"></span>
Line 63:		Line 63:
	The mechanism continuously adjusts the split between:		The mechanism continuously adjusts the split between:

	* '''Personal ~~Credits~~ ([[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Rewards\|Rewards]], P2)''': held in individual accounts, potentially convertible to CHF.		* '''Personal Rewards ([[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Rewards\|Rewards]], P2)''': held in individual accounts, potentially convertible to CHF.
	* '''Community pool''': funding [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:User Groups\|User Groups]], shared infrastructure, collective projects (including [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Karma-Tokens\|Karma tokens]] for services).		* '''Community pool''': funding [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:User Groups\|User Groups]], shared infrastructure, collective projects (including [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Karma-Tokens\|Karma tokens]] for services).

	The ratio changes based on the platform's funding cost ratio. This is a continuous curve: there is no fixed cap, no sudden thresholds, no arbitrary percentages. The intended sequence: in early stages, more ~~Credits~~ flow to the community pool (the platform needs community engagement first); as the platform grows and subscription revenue rises, more ~~Credits~~ flow to personal accounts, so funders who waited are progressively rewarded.		The ratio changes based on the platform's funding cost ratio. This is a continuous curve: there is no fixed cap, no sudden thresholds, no arbitrary percentages. The intended sequence: in early stages, more Rewards flow to the community pool (the platform needs community engagement first); as the platform grows and subscription revenue rises, more Rewards flow to personal accounts, so funders who waited are progressively rewarded.

	<span id="principles"></span>		<span id="principles"></span>
Line 81:		Line 81:
	Need-Driven Funding is a companion to the bonding curve, not part of it:		Need-Driven Funding is a companion to the bonding curve, not part of it:

	* '''[[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Bonding Curve\|Bonding curve]]''' → determines total ~~Credits~~ generated per CHF.		* '''[[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Bonding Curve\|Bonding curve]]''' → determines total Rewards generated per CHF.
	* '''Need-Driven Funding''' → determines how those ~~Credits~~ are split (~~Rewards~~ vs. community).		* '''Need-Driven Funding''' → determines how those Rewards are split (personal vs. community).
	* '''[[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Subscriptions\|Subscription model]]''' → provides the revenue that would make Rewards convertible.		* '''[[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Subscriptions\|Subscription model]]''' → provides the revenue that would make Rewards convertible.