Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Annual Value Increase - Revision history

AI-Admin-Assistant: Add Category:Innovation

2026-07-22T15:57:10Z

Add Category:Innovation

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:57, 22 July 2026
Line 65:		Line 65:

	[[Category:Migration June 2026]]		[[Category:Migration June 2026]]
			[[Category:Innovation]]
	<!-- visible -->		<!-- visible -->

AI-Admin-Assistant: Base hypothesis section: goal is to demonstrate its relevance; cost implication for the yearly subscription, counterpart global services (Theo audio 2026-07-15)

2026-07-15T12:47:43Z

Base hypothesis section: goal is to demonstrate its relevance; cost implication for the yearly subscription, counterpart global services (Theo audio 2026-07-15)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:47, 15 July 2026
Line 24:		Line 24:
	* It is not decided whether it would be implemented at all.		* It is not decided whether it would be implemented at all.
	* No percentage is defined. Figures mentioned in earlier drafts were only illustrations and are withdrawn.		* No percentage is defined. Figures mentioned in earlier drafts were only illustrations and are withdrawn.

			<span id="base-hypothesis"></span>
			== The base hypothesis and its cost ==
			A possible annual percentage increase on rewards is under study through this draft Open Call (not yet launched); no percentage is decided. This is the '''base hypothesis''' of the call, and the goal of the call is to demonstrate, or invalidate, its relevance.

			If it were adopted, it would also mean an increase in the cost of the platform: typically, in ten years, the yearly subscription would be significantly higher than today. The counterpart is that this subscription is linked to global services that aim at letting users avoid separate legal advice for their commercial dealings, which is an important part of its value.

	<span id="multiplier"></span>		<span id="multiplier"></span>

AI-Admin-Assistant: Enrich: multiplier more relevant than added percentage, prudent bond analogy (Theo point 15)

2026-07-13T11:28:30Z

Enrich: multiplier more relevant than added percentage, prudent bond analogy (Theo point 15)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:28, 13 July 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{KidsIntro\|Maybe one day, rewards could slowly grow a little each year, like a savings jar. Nobody has decided yet. The team plans to ask everyone through an Open Call: people will send ideas and studies, and then a choice will be made.}}		{{KidsIntro\|Maybe one day, rewards could slowly grow a little each year, like a savings jar. Nobody has decided yet. The team plans to ask everyone through an Open Call: people will send ideas and studies, and then a choice will be made.}}
	{{ExpertIntro\|A possible annual percentage increase on rewards is under study. No percentage is decided; figures mentioned in earlier drafts were only illustrations and are withdrawn. The question is planned as a dedicated Open Call (draft, not yet launched) that would collect proposals and scientific and economic analyses of its positive and negative impacts. The topic gains relevance over the funding rounds, since the bonding curve multiplier is intended to decrease round after round.}}		{{ExpertIntro\|A possible annual percentage increase on rewards is under study. No percentage is decided; figures mentioned in earlier drafts were only illustrations and are withdrawn. The multiplier is considered more relevant than an added percentage on the reward only. The question is planned as a dedicated Open Call (draft, not yet launched) that would collect proposals and scientific and economic analyses of its positive and negative impacts. The topic gains relevance over the funding rounds, since the bonding curve multiplier is intended to decrease round after round.}}

	__TOC__		__TOC__
Line 24:		Line 24:
	* It is not decided whether it would be implemented at all.		* It is not decided whether it would be implemented at all.
	* No percentage is defined. Figures mentioned in earlier drafts were only illustrations and are withdrawn.		* No percentage is defined. Figures mentioned in earlier drafts were only illustrations and are withdrawn.

			<span id="multiplier"></span>
			== The multiplier matters more than the percentage ==
			In this model, '''the multiplier is more relevant than an added percentage on the reward only''': the bonding curve multiplier, applied at donation time, is what mainly shapes the potential reward; an annual percentage would only be a secondary adjustment on top of it.

			If it were adopted, the interest would be to create a stable commitment, in some ways comparable to a stable state bond, but issued by the worldwide community of online commerce users. This would create a new interest group at the international level: the actors of online commerce. As everywhere in this model, this remains a donation-based, non-speculative mechanism, with no guarantee: rewards remain potential ceilings, paid only from real subscription income.

	<span id="open-call"></span>		<span id="open-call"></span>

AI-Admin-Assistant: Reframe as draft Open Call: remove the 5% figure (illustration withdrawn), add rounds/multiplier rationale, ExpertIntro + TOC + anchors (Theo audio 2026-07-03)

2026-07-03T09:50:10Z

Reframe as draft Open Call: remove the 5% figure (illustration withdrawn), add rounds/multiplier rationale, ExpertIntro + TOC + anchors (Theo audio 2026-07-03)

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:50, 3 July 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{KidsIntro\|Maybe one day, ~~Credits~~ could slowly grow ~~in value~~ each year, ~~a little~~ like a savings jar. ~~But this is not~~ decided yet: it is ~~one~~ of the ~~money questions~~ the ~~team still has~~ to ~~study while building the first prototype~~.}}		{{KidsIntro\|Maybe one day, rewards could slowly grow a little each year, like a savings jar. Nobody has decided yet. The team plans to ask everyone through an Open Call: people will send ideas and studies, and then a choice will be made.}}
			{{ExpertIntro\|A possible annual percentage increase on rewards is under study. No percentage is decided; figures mentioned in earlier drafts were only illustrations and are withdrawn. The question is planned as a dedicated Open Call (draft, not yet launched) that would collect proposals and scientific and economic analyses of its positive and negative impacts. The topic gains relevance over the funding rounds, since the bonding curve multiplier is intended to decrease round after round.}}

	== Annual Value Increase (~~open question~~) ==		__TOC__
	''Economic question, WikiDeal R&D ~~· to be studied during Prototype 1~~''
			= Annual Value Increase (draft Open Call) =
			''Economic question, WikiDeal R&D. Status: draft Open Call, not yet launched, not decided, not yet implemented.''

	{\| class="wikitable"		{\| class="wikitable"
Line 8:		Line 11:
	\| Origin \|\| 🟢 WikiDeal concept		\| Origin \|\| 🟢 WikiDeal concept
	\|-		\|-
	\| Status \|\| '''Open ~~question~~, not decided, not yet implemented'''		\| Status \|\| '''Draft Open Call, not yet launched, not decided, not yet implemented'''
	\|-		\|-
	\| Scope \|\| To be ~~addressed during the realization of Prototype 1~~		\| Scope \|\| To be studied through a dedicated Open Call, at a later stage
	\|}		\|}

	=== What is it? ===		<span id="what-is-it"></span>
	One recurring question from WikiDeal funders is: ''"what do I get back?"'' One idea under ~~discussion~~ is that ~~the value of subscriptions / Credits~~ could increase slightly each year.		== What is it? ==
			One recurring question from WikiDeal funders is: ''"what do I get back?"'' One idea under study is that rewards could increase slightly each year, through an annual percentage increase.

			This idea is '''only a proposal, not a confirmed feature'''. At this stage:

			* It is not decided whether it would be implemented at all.
			* No percentage is defined. Figures mentioned in earlier drafts were only illustrations and are withdrawn.

	~~This~~ is ~~'''only~~ a ~~proposal~~, not ~~a confirmed feature'''~~. ~~At this stage~~:		<span id="open-call"></span>
			== A dedicated Open Call (draft) ==
			The question is intended to be handled through a dedicated [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Call:Main\|Open Call]], which is currently a draft and is not yet launched or announced. When launched, it would collect:

	* ~~We do '''not''' know '''whether''' it will be implemented at all.~~		* proposals for the mechanism itself (principle, percentage, conditions),
	* We do '''not''' know the ~~exact '''~~percentage~~''' if it were.~~		* scientific and economic analyses of the positive and negative impacts of an annual percentage increase on rewards.
	* ~~The figure~~ of ~~'''5% is only a hypothetical maximum cap''':~~ the ~~real value would be ''x%'', with 5% as the ceiling~~ of ~~the proposal~~.

	~~It was originally imagined as an attractive mechanism~~, ~~but in practice it is '''too complex to implement on Prototype 1'''. It therefore becomes one of the economic questions to~~ be ~~examined ''during'' the prototype's development, not a commitment made in advance~~.		A launch date, and a possible deadline, would be announced later.

	=== ~~If it were implemented =~~==		<span id="why-over-time"></span>
	~~Should the team decide~~ to ~~adopt it after study~~, ~~the principle would~~ be:		== Why the question grows over time ==
			The bonding curve multiplier is intended to decrease as funding rounds progress. An indicative sample trajectory (hypothesis, to be confirmed):

	* ~~An increase in the value of subscriptions, '''calculated pro-rata~~ from ~~the launch of the project'''.~~		* Round 1: from ×100 down to ×30 (current prototype)
	* ~~A '''progressive yearly increase of x%''', with '''5% as the maximum cap hypothesis''' (not a guaranteed rate)~~.		* Round 2: from ×30 down to ×10
			* Round 3: possibly from ×10 down to ×2
			* Round 4: from ×2 down to ×1.1

	The ~~aim would be~~ a ~~'''stable~~, ~~predictable anchor''' rather than speculative volatility~~. ~~It can be understood as~~ the ~~'''equivalent of~~ a ~~stablecoin'''~~, ~~since it would be anchored to~~ the ~~Swiss franc, a particularly stable reference currency~~.		The lower the multiplier, the more relevant an annual percentage increase on rewards could become. For example, a ×1.1 multiplier is only a 10% potential gain, which could be little over ten years. This is why the Open Call is planned for a later stage, not for the first prototype.

	=== Why this framing ===		<span id="framing"></span>
	This page intentionally avoids presenting the increase as a fixed contractual promise. ~~It is an '''open economic question''' that will be debated and decided during Prototype 1~~, with the percentage ~~and~~ the ~~very principle still to be confirmed~~.		== Why this framing ==
			This page intentionally avoids presenting the increase as a fixed contractual promise. Rewards remain potential ceilings, paid only from real subscription income, with no guarantee. The principle and the percentage remain open until the Open Call process concludes.

	----		----
	'''See also:''' [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/~~Innovations~~:Main\|~~All innovations~~]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Main\|~~R&D~~ Portal]]		'''See also:''' [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Call:Main\|Open Calls]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Main\|All innovations]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:Economy/Main\|Economy and funding]]

	[[Category:Migration June 2026]]		[[Category:Migration June 2026]]
	<!-- visible -->		<!-- visible -->

AI-Admin-Assistant: Attribution convention 2026-07-02: name moved to Credits page; attribution now 'WikiDeal concept'/'WikiDeal founder' with credits link; em-dash cleanup

2026-07-03T00:11:47Z

Attribution convention 2026-07-02: name moved to Credits page; attribution now 'WikiDeal concept'/'WikiDeal founder' with credits link; em-dash cleanup

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:11, 3 July 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{KidsIntro\|Maybe one day, Credits could slowly grow in value each year — a little like a savings jar. But this is not decided yet: it is one of the money questions the team still has to study while building the first prototype.}}		{{KidsIntro\|Maybe one day, Credits could slowly grow in value each year, a little like a savings jar. But this is not decided yet: it is one of the money questions the team still has to study while building the first prototype.}}

	== Annual Value Increase (open question) ==		== Annual Value Increase (open question) ==
	''Economic question — WikiDeal R&D · to be studied during Prototype 1''		''Economic question, WikiDeal R&D · to be studied during Prototype 1''

	{\| class="wikitable"		{\| class="wikitable"
	\|-		\|-
	\| Origin \|\| 🟢 ~~Théo Bondolfi~~		\| Origin \|\| 🟢 WikiDeal concept
	\|-		\|-
	\| Status \|\| '''Open question — not decided, not yet implemented'''		\| Status \|\| '''Open question, not decided, not yet implemented'''
	\|-		\|-
	\| Scope \|\| To be addressed during the realization of Prototype 1		\| Scope \|\| To be addressed during the realization of Prototype 1
Line 20:		Line 20:
	* We do '''not''' know '''whether''' it will be implemented at all.		* We do '''not''' know '''whether''' it will be implemented at all.
	* We do '''not''' know the exact '''percentage''' if it were.		* We do '''not''' know the exact '''percentage''' if it were.
	* The figure of '''5% is only a hypothetical maximum cap''' — the real value would be ''x%'', with 5% as the ceiling of the proposal.		* The figure of '''5% is only a hypothetical maximum cap''': the real value would be ''x%'', with 5% as the ceiling of the proposal.

	It was originally imagined as an attractive mechanism, but in practice it is '''too complex to implement on Prototype 1'''. It therefore becomes one of the economic questions to be examined ''during'' the prototype's development, not a commitment made in advance.		It was originally imagined as an attractive mechanism, but in practice it is '''too complex to implement on Prototype 1'''. It therefore becomes one of the economic questions to be examined ''during'' the prototype's development, not a commitment made in advance.
Line 30:		Line 30:
	* A '''progressive yearly increase of x%''', with '''5% as the maximum cap hypothesis''' (not a guaranteed rate).		* A '''progressive yearly increase of x%''', with '''5% as the maximum cap hypothesis''' (not a guaranteed rate).

	The aim would be a '''stable, predictable anchor''' rather than speculative volatility. It can be understood as the '''equivalent of a stablecoin''', since it would be anchored to the Swiss franc — a particularly stable reference currency.		The aim would be a '''stable, predictable anchor''' rather than speculative volatility. It can be understood as the '''equivalent of a stablecoin''', since it would be anchored to the Swiss franc, a particularly stable reference currency.

	=== Why this framing ===		=== Why this framing ===

AI-Admin-Assistant: Protected "Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Annual Value Increase": Bulk protection: Gov pages = administrators only (Theo 2026-06-20) ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))

2026-06-20T13:27:46Z

Protected "Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Annual Value Increase": Bulk protection: Gov pages = administrators only (Theo 2026-06-20) ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:27, 20 June 2026
(No difference)

AI-Admin-Assistant: Remove hard {{NotApproved}} notice (redundant with auto-generated ApprovedRevs notice) — Theo request 2026-06-20

2026-06-20T13:03:28Z

Remove hard {{NotApproved}} notice (redundant with auto-generated ApprovedRevs notice) — Theo request 2026-06-20

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:03, 20 June 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{KidsIntro\|Maybe one day, Credits could slowly grow in value each year — a little like a savings jar. But this is not decided yet: it is one of the money questions the team still has to study while building the first prototype.}}		{{KidsIntro\|Maybe one day, Credits could slowly grow in value each year — a little like a savings jar. But this is not decided yet: it is one of the money questions the team still has to study while building the first prototype.}}

	~~{{NotApproved}}~~

	== Annual Value Increase (open question) ==		== Annual Value Increase (open question) ==

AI-Admin-Assistant: Reframe 5% Annual Value Increase as an open economic question for Prototype 1 (not a fixed commitment; 5% = max cap hypothesis; stablecoin analogy)

2026-06-14T07:20:33Z

Reframe 5% Annual Value Increase as an open economic question for Prototype 1 (not a fixed commitment; 5% = max cap hypothesis; stablecoin analogy)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:20, 14 June 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{KidsIntro\|Credits slowly grow in value ~~every~~ year, a little like a savings jar ~~that gets a bit fuller on its own~~. ~~If you keep your Credits, they are worth a touch more next year~~.}}		{{KidsIntro\|Maybe one day, Credits could slowly grow in value each year — a little like a savings jar. But this is not decided yet: it is one of the money questions the team still has to study while building the first prototype.}}

	{{NotApproved}}		{{NotApproved}}

	== 5% Annual Value Increase ==		== Annual Value Increase (open question) ==
	''~~Innovation~~ — WikiDeal R&D''		''Economic question — WikiDeal R&D · to be studied during Prototype 1''

	{\| class="wikitable"		{\| class="wikitable"
Line 10:		Line 10:
	\| Origin \|\| 🟢 Théo Bondolfi		\| Origin \|\| 🟢 Théo Bondolfi
	\|-		\|-
	\| Status \|\| Prototype 1 ~~— In testing~~		\| Status \|\| '''Open question — not decided, not yet implemented'''
			\|-
			\| Scope \|\| To be addressed during the realization of Prototype 1
	\|}		\|}

	=== What is it? ===		=== What is it? ===
	Credits ~~are designed to gain about~~ 5% ~~in CHF~~ value ~~each year~~. As an ~~illustration~~, ~~CHF~~ 1 of ~~funding contributions becomes about CHF 1~~.05 after ~~one year and roughly CHF 1~~.~~63 after ten years~~. The aim ~~is to provide~~ a stable, predictable anchor ~~in Swiss francs~~ rather than speculative volatility ~~— positioning Credits~~ as a ~~steady~~, ~~safe-haven-style store of value rather than~~ a ~~bet~~.		One recurring question from WikiDeal funders is: ''"what do I get back?"'' One idea under discussion is that the value of subscriptions / Credits could increase slightly each year.

			This is '''only a proposal, not a confirmed feature'''. At this stage:

			* We do '''not''' know '''whether''' it will be implemented at all.
			* We do '''not''' know the exact '''percentage''' if it were.
			* The figure of '''5% is only a hypothetical maximum cap''' — the real value would be ''x%'', with 5% as the ceiling of the proposal.

			It was originally imagined as an attractive mechanism, but in practice it is '''too complex to implement on Prototype 1'''. It therefore becomes one of the economic questions to be examined ''during'' the prototype's development, not a commitment made in advance.

			=== If it were implemented ===
			Should the team decide to adopt it after study, the principle would be:

			* An increase in the value of subscriptions, '''calculated pro-rata from the launch of the project'''.
			* A '''progressive yearly increase of x%''', with '''5% as the maximum cap hypothesis''' (not a guaranteed rate).

			The aim would be a '''stable, predictable anchor''' rather than speculative volatility. It can be understood as the '''equivalent of a stablecoin''', since it would be anchored to the Swiss franc — a particularly stable reference currency.

	=== ~~How it works on WikiDeal~~ ===		=== Why this framing ===
	~~The~~ increase ~~is built into the Credit accounting model and applies over time to held Credits~~. It is ~~meant to reward patience~~ and ~~long-term commitment to~~ the ~~commons rather than short-term trading. Precise mechanics~~ and ~~any conditions will~~ be ~~documented progressively as the platform evolves~~.		This page intentionally avoids presenting the increase as a fixed contractual promise. It is an '''open economic question''' that will be debated and decided during Prototype 1, with the percentage and the very principle still to be confirmed.

	----		----

AI-Admin-Assistant: Migration content (make visible in Recent changes)

2026-06-13T20:44:35Z

Migration content (make visible in Recent changes)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:44, 13 June 2026
Line 23:		Line 23:

	[[Category:Migration June 2026]]		[[Category:Migration June 2026]]
			<!-- visible -->

AI-Admin-Assistant: LOT 3: fill EN innovation fiche (migration)

2026-06-13T18:38:19Z

LOT 3: fill EN innovation fiche (migration)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-'''Annual Value Increase''' — WikiDeal socio-economic innovation.
+{{KidsIntro|Credits slowly grow in value every year, a little like a savings jar that gets a bit fuller on its own. If you keep your Credits, they are worth a touch more next year.}}
-''Here is a first content idea for this page.'' +5% annual value. This page describes the innovation, its intention, and the context in which it fits within WikiDeal's model.
+{{NotApproved}}
-''Reference language: English. This is a starter page — content to be expanded.''
+== 5% Annual Value Increase ==
-See also: [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Main|All innovations]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Main|R&D Portal]]
+{| class="wikitable"